Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

February 29th - that boring hackneyed old crap again

81 replies

LineRunner · 29/02/2012 09:05

I've just switched the Breakfast News over, as it's now on its second report of the day on manicures, only to find ITV's equivalent is having a rather large and silly segment on 'ladies popping the question'. With a psychologist. And, for some inexplicable reason, Michael Portillo. (Will he now go on anything?)

Does anyone really care who proposes to whom and when? Is it just me who finds this stuff tediously whimsical and infantilising?

To even pretend that women 'get the upper' hand in crucial social and economic relationships once every four years is shallow and specious, I reckon.

OP posts:
JosieRosie · 29/02/2012 10:44

'I don't understand why people want to tie themselves to someone forever. I think there should be a 2 year review clause in any marriage, so you can walk away without fault. I don't know about anyone else, but at 25 (when I got married) I was a different person than I am now, and so was he. People change, and traditional marriage requires that they suppress or ignore that change'

I love it CrunchyFrog, I love it. This 'til death do us part' stuff makes no sense to me either. I would go so far as to say that I think it's totally unrealistic to promise to stay together with someone else forever - if it work out, great, but it will be because you are compatible partners who respect each other and work at your relationship, not because you 'promised' yourself to each other one day many years ago.

And I'm really pleased for you that your life has turned around in such a positive way Grin

CrunchyFrog · 29/02/2012 10:36

linerunner but don't you get a lovely warm glow when people tell you how fabulous X is for paying what he is legally required to?

That's one of my favourites. That and how nice it is of him to "babysit" them. IT'S CALLED SPENDING TIME WITH YOUR CHILDREN, IDIOTS. My sister babysits. XH PARENTS.

LineRunner · 29/02/2012 10:34

Sardine, I don't feel I got any protection financially through divorce as opposed to splitting up. I didn't get any of my Ex's pension. I got two expensive bundles of joy called children to raise, as Ex was allowed to abrogate all responsibilities on that front bar mininal child support, and I got the house - but also the mortgage. He took 'his' car 'because he needed it for work.' I was told to get to work on the bus and 'get childcare'. I had two consecutive solicitors who said I had to suck this up, because there was a small amount of equity in the house at that time. (There isn't now.)

His new girlfriend rang me up to tell me, 'You should get a better paying job so Ex doesn't have to keep paying you child support.'

I felt like I'd had the wolves set on me.

Trills, I get the tosser argument. (I should know!) But if the structual inequalities weren't still in place, women wouldn't be so dependent on whether men decide to be decent or not. The inequalities are still there; just possibly better hidden these days.

OP posts:
CrunchyFrog · 29/02/2012 10:31

I was terribly unhappily married.

Nobody outside the situation can understand why. As has been said to me, well, he didn't hit you, he didn't cheat and he didn't drink. What other reasons could there possibly be?

Some people are just constitutionally not suited to partnership, I'm one of them. That seems alien to most women. They cannot understand it. Even single friends my age seem to be longing for a relationship. I can't understand that.

I got sick of being permanently responsible for the happiness of 4 other people - the kids and XH. That the state of the house was my responsibility, despite working more hours than him. That he was seen as the breadwinner, despite me earning more. Sick of lack of independence - why would you want to go away without your partner? Why wouldn't you want to live in their pocket?

I am so much happier single. It's totally changed my life (I've lost 6 stone with minimal effort, am fit, healthy apart from the fags, have gone back to my music - so happy)

The kids are happier, and now have a relationship with their father that doesn't go through me.

I don't understand why people want to tie themselves to someone forever. I think there should be a 2 year review clause in any marriage, so you can walk away without fault. I don't know about anyone else, but at 25 (when I got married) I was a different person than I am now, and so was he. People change, and traditional marriage requires that they suppress or ignore that change.

Gosh, I am cross about this Grin

Trills · 29/02/2012 10:18

The trouble with averages is that they don't necessarily translate into advice for individuals.

On average women may be unhappier married than single, because a significant portion of women are married to tossers. Doesn't mean you will necessarily be unhappier married, it depends if the person you are marrying turn out to be a tosser.

(my calculations assume that more women are married to men-who-make-them-miserable than men are married to women-who-make-them-miserable)

SardineQueen · 29/02/2012 10:17

linerunner would you think the situation would have been better if you had not been married?

I am not staunchly defending marriage here BTW but thinking about the fact that women's position in society has not really moved on.

SardineQueen · 29/02/2012 10:14

My professional life is knackered by having children. Even without a divorce.

People would say that was my choice though!

LineRunner · 29/02/2012 10:09

One thing I know - I will never, ever get married again! I lost my profesisonal identity. Still working on getting it back, ten years on, now the DCs are teenagers.

Having children and then being handed sole responsibility (which is what happens to many woman after divorce) affected my career very negatively.

OP posts:
SardineQueen · 29/02/2012 10:03

I must admit that I was under the impression that in terms of legal protection and rights and so on, women who were married were in a better position than those not married. And so that really not a lot has changed in the last however many hundred years apart from now not marrying is more socially acceptable and so men are able to walk away from their responsiblities much more easily IYSWIM.

KRITIQ · 29/02/2012 10:03

I just feel sorry for folks born on 29th February - only get a birthday every 4 years!

CrunchyFrog · 29/02/2012 10:03

I remember seeing that, LR. There was a hierarchy of happiness - married men, single women, single men, married women.

It's being thrown into sharp relief for me at the moment, spending most of my time with men who are in very traditional relationships. Many women buy into the big lie - hell, I did myself - that being part of a married couple gives status, keeps you safe etc.

I will say though, of the men I know, even the ones I have thought of as lovely, kind people (and they mostly are, most of the time), very very few have been totally faithful. I'm now accepting of infidelity in a way I never thought I would be, simply because it appears practically universal. Sad

And the women accept it, and accept that they'll be sitting at home while the men go out and drink/ do their hobbies. They let it happen as long as they get the payoff of Having A Husband who does the required minimum.

Oh, it makes me all cross.

SardineQueen · 29/02/2012 10:02

"the judge was very concerned to make sure my ExH got a 'genuine fresh start' financially (my ExH walked out) - but I was apparently expected to be thrilled that I was 'getting the children'. "

OUCH

SardineQueen · 29/02/2012 10:01

Pensions is the big one surely? I thought that if you were married it was possible to get a share of the pension and not otherwise, which is a big deal.

LineRunner · 29/02/2012 10:00

linerunner don't women who are divorced do better than women who were not married?

I don't know that, Sardine. I think it depends on how much money (or debt) was 'in the marriage' to start with. And how long the marriage lasted.

On a slight tangent: In my case I found the judge was very concerned to make sure my ExH got a 'genuine fresh start' financially (my ExH walked out) - but I was apparently expected to be thrilled that I was 'getting the children'. The structual inequalities in terms of earning potential post-divorce were glaring to me.

OP posts:
LineRunner · 29/02/2012 09:55

Trills, I recall statistics on mental health that showed women were happier unmarried than married; but that the opposite was true for men. This was a few years back, mind you.

OP posts:
SardineQueen · 29/02/2012 09:55

trills yes I agree but the fact it was in the papers in that way shows that these ideas are still out there IYSWIM

linerunner don't women who are divorced do better than women who were not married?

LineRunner · 29/02/2012 09:54

But men tend to come out of divorce better, especially revenue-wise, because they tend not to have care of children. They contribute 20% top whack to the children's upbringing, after tax; and tend to contribute a minority of care. Women tend to have to contribute up to 100% their earnings to maintain their children's home and towards their upbringing; and contribute the majority of care.

That really dampens down women's earning power.

Also post-divorce 'assets' like the home can come with rents or mortgages attached for the woman to pay.

OP posts:
Hullygully · 29/02/2012 09:53

I'm sure you're right about Katie, Trills. That woman is no fool (despite her odd choices).

Trills · 29/02/2012 09:51

It doesn't matter if the statistics say that marriage is better for men than for women. Do your statistics say that marriage is good or bad for women?

Trills · 29/02/2012 09:49

There never was any such thing as "Waity Katie", IMO. I think they had an agreement that they wouldn't get engaged until they were ready to get married and then immediately have the press bothering them about "when are you going to have children?". They knew the fuss if they got married and then didn't have children for a few years would be more stressful than the fuss of "why haven't they got married yet?".

SardineQueen · 29/02/2012 09:48

Sad thing is that with earnings disparity, society setup meaning women's earning power / actual earnings go through the floor when they have children and women's pensions being so terrible, situations when people split up etc it actually is beneficial for women to get married unless they are financially independent.

Things have not really changed on that score.

LineRunner · 29/02/2012 09:47

'A woman proposing marriage is sowing the seeds of her own destruction.' That would have been a cool news piece.

OP posts:
Nyac · 29/02/2012 09:40

Propaganda.

They make such a big deal of the wedding and the ring on the finger, that they forget to mention that for a lot of women marriage is about being a man's domestic servant.

MooncupGoddess · 29/02/2012 09:37

Nyac Grin

Why are people still obsessed with marriage in this day and age? Why, why? And, especially, why are so many women still obsessed with marriage, when the statistics show that marriage is much better for men than for women, and women initiate two-thirds of divorces?

Nyac · 29/02/2012 09:33

Maybe they should try a different approach and make Feb 29th Misterectomy Day.

"On that special day ladies, ask him for a divorce".

Swipe left for the next trending thread