Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

not sure what to title this but it's to do with ejaculation

490 replies

YuleingFanjo · 15/02/2012 10:59

and in particular a man ejaculating on a woman's face. Sorry - I feel awful writing it down.

I was talking to a friend last night, she is much nore sexually adventurous than I am and she was saying that she thought it was part of normal sexual behaviour, that most men found it a turn on and most people she knew thought it was normal.

I argued that it was something that came from porn, was not what I would call normal and there was no equivilant sexual 'thing' for a woman to do to a man. She said that women can 'gush' (I have never done this, maybe I am abnormal) or piss or poo (!) which I pointed out was a totally different thing. But is it?

I was trying to discuss it with her and point out that her sexual encounters are out of the norm, definitely aren't encounters within a loving relationship, and that ejaculating in someones's face is surely more about disrespect than anything else?

or am I wrong. I just find it really horrible and if anyone asked me to let them do so I would show them the door.

Soory - I hope I don't sound like some hairy trucker trying to get off on the whole thing, and I am not asking for personal experiences (I would prefer not to read them thanks) but more to discuss if I am right about the power/porn/disrespect thing...

OP posts:
stephrick · 16/02/2012 19:03

I think that a honest sexual relationship is important, as you get older you should tell your partner what you like, where you like it and how hard, I find this a turn on.

MyNameIsNotSusan · 16/02/2012 18:46

And just to say

Unless you are a rad fem who is either a lesbian or doesnt do penetrative sex, you could say that ALL sex, even if it is between consenting adults, is degrading to women. But its NOT. That is a gross misrepresentation of what sex can be.

MyNameIsNotSusan · 16/02/2012 18:44

Beachcomber - I absolutely agree with all that you have said. well put and reasonable.

But it works both ways.

Why are some people saying 'I hate semen' and 'How can you possibly get pleasure from sitting on a man's face?' in a fit of prudish, moral outrage? It makes me feel uncomfortable.

I am not allowed to say 'Yes, this act has been glorified as part of a warped, male dominated and extremely damaging porn industry' BUT I like all sorts of sex. I can do feminist analysis and kinky sex.

Some feminists are intent on turning us into Mary fucking Whitehouse.

Lets critique the patriarchy, fuck yeah. But can we allow female sexuality a place, please?

SinicalSanta · 16/02/2012 18:18

well that is true.

I think what I was catching the tail of, is when it's not. when it's something the woman actively enjoys, rather than just lets him do, or worse, feels she has to do.

WidowWadman · 16/02/2012 18:15

It's just not True/False. Life and humans are more complicated than that.

WidowWadman · 16/02/2012 18:13

Sinical - see, I think it can be disrespectful. Or not. Depending on the circumstances.

SinicalSanta · 16/02/2012 18:12

WWno not at all.
the question of the thread has 2 possible answers - it IS disrespectful.
-It is NOT disrespectful. Just exploring the second option. It is after all a discussion, and with all the personal/political blurring I was merely trying to sound detached.

Also OP has repeatedly clarified her question, and admitted she could have worded it differently. To continously dwell on how judgey she is to distract from the question she asked,

WidowWadman · 16/02/2012 17:58

TBE - I don't think you can get STDs in your eye from someone who you know not to have an STD. Safer Sex in ONS is a connected issue, and worth discussing, but OP implied that this practice would never be done inside a loving relationship. Which is, going by the postings of those who indulge in it, an incorrect assumption.

If the OP had asked about how is this safe when you have sex with someone of unknown serostatus that would have been a reasonable question, and not come across as judgemental.

TBE · 16/02/2012 17:48

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Beachcomber · 16/02/2012 17:48

Well I'm being political about it.

I'm saying an act that has its roots in porn/came from the porn directors' brainstorming on how to keep making money from filmed prostitution, is misogynistic. Hell the porn producers are perfectly clear about what the money shot is! They make no pretence that is is any other than penis worshipping and intended as an act of domination and disrespect.

I make no judgement on individuals who have added this practice to their private sex lives by saying that.

I think our obsession with PIV is misogynistic but I practice it in a fairly typical way. I don't beat myself up about that, or judge myself, or think it makes me a bad feminist. I just think it makes me a product of my society.

Equally I won't let that fact that I practice something, stop me from politically analysing it - that way lies handmaidenship and the demise of feminism (which is just what patriarchy wants).

yellowraincoat · 16/02/2012 17:31

But how on earth can you possibly say what is the norm in a sexual relationship? And even if you could, what difference would that make? If my boyfriend and I enjoy flinging sweetcorn at each other for pleasure, is it wrong because it's not "normal"? Is something only ok if everyone else is doing it?

YuleingFanjo · 16/02/2012 17:29

I don't think it is normal - as in I don't think it is the norm in sexual relationships. Perhaps I am wrong about that.

I personally would find it degrading.

OP posts:
yellowraincoat · 16/02/2012 17:27

Because people aren't politically analysing. They're throwing words like normal and degrading around.

Beachcomber · 16/02/2012 17:24

There seems to be a lot of confusion between the personal and the political here IMO.

Politically I think this trend of men ejaculating on women's faces is misogynistic.

That does not mean that I make any sort of judgement about individual women who consent to or enjoy this particular act.

It means I think our sexuality is socialized and I don't think it is women who are dominating the socialization.

I think there is also a confusion of the moral and the political.

I am not pearl clutching (moral outrage), I am analysing from a feminist perspective (political observation).

Nothing happens in a vacuum - we live in a patriarchy and it pervades every area of our lives. It strikes me as very blinkered to exclude sexuality from that.

I think we should be allowed to discuss these things politically without having individuals take things personally and object to a political discussion on the basis of personal values - particularly as those personal values are neither being examined nor judged.

Feminism is about women as a group.

I gave up my job and financial independence to look after my kids and now I work from home. I do not think that these are radical feminist acts but they are my personal choices that I made. I do not object to feminist discussions about financial independence on the basis that they make me uncomfortable about my individual choices - because I know those discussions aren't about me in a personal way, they are about women as a group. They are political discussions not personal criticisms.

I think the suggestion that women politically analysing sexuality is somehow 'pearl clutching' or done in disgust is extraordinarily navel gazing actually. Sorry to be so blunt.

YuleingFanjo · 16/02/2012 17:24

yellowraincoat, I first talked about coersion at 14:01:09 in response to other posters.

OP posts:
WidowWadman · 16/02/2012 17:23

sinicalsanta - how does that work? You make it sound like it was totally unusual.

I'm not a psychologist, but I assume seeing how someone is turned on by you gives you a feeling of power over them

SquishyCinnamonSwirls · 16/02/2012 17:23

I think an important question hasn't been answered, if a woman was ejaculating (which yes, can happen!) onto a man's face would you still see the same issue?

YuleingFanjo · 16/02/2012 17:21

"You do sound really judgemental though, Fanjo"

ah - xpost. I realise now that people may have seen me use the word 'normal' and it triggered something which made them think I was calling them ab-normal which in turn may have made you think I am being judgemental.
Still not entirely clear about where I have been really judgemental about my friend.

OP posts:
69postssofar · 16/02/2012 17:21

The thread was originally about whether or not someone ejaculating in your friend's face was disrespectful. A handful of us have said we don't think it is and that is not because we are slappers or porn stars it is because we all have different ideas about sex.

I personally don't like DH going down on me, that doesn't make it wrong for others to enjoy it and I'll happily do it for him. I don't like having sex in the daytime (it makes me giggle at the absurdity of it all when I can see it in the daylight!) but when I convince myself to do it I actually enjoy it.

I am not some swinging nympho, just a normal wife/woman/mum (with enough kids already) who doesn't see a problem with the geography of where the sperm ends up, as long as its not in my fanjo!

I don't understand what the fuss is about. Maybe if I had watched porn I would associate it with something unsavoury, but its always just been something we do.

SinicalSanta · 16/02/2012 17:21

My last post was to Yellow

will be back later I find this discussion very interesting

SinicalSanta · 16/02/2012 17:19

I would imagine so.
I am certainly, as is DH.
Was just curious s to the psychology of that.
It's the polar opposite of porn-type scenarios, imo. Much naicer

SensitivityChip · 16/02/2012 17:19

DH and I have done this occasionally. There isn't much he could do during sex to degrade me tbh because there is no underlying power struggle / problem in our relationship. I've also done similar to him.

It definitely comes from porn/people discussing porn, we are both late twenties and I know DH used to watch a lot before I started reading about the subject and we had a few conversations which disturbed him. He honestly believed the happy hooker myths the lads mags peddled but has opened his eyes a little now. Things like this seem to be more acceptable to people of our age because we have been much more exposed to it.

I just asked him if it was a degradation thing and he said it is exciting for him for the same reasons as coming in mouths etc it demonstrates that I don't think his semen is so disgusting that I don't want it touching me. He has however seen it done under duress (hopefully acted) in a porn film and he said that was very degrading and put him off which would make sense as he hasn't seemed to want to do it for a long time now.

It has never struck me as degrading when he does it, if I was being paid to "let" a stranger do it to me then I expect I would feel differently.

YuleingFanjo · 16/02/2012 17:19

here is the crux of my OP

"she was saying that she thought it was part of normal sexual behaviour, that most men found it a turn on and most people she knew thought it was normal."

she said this... we were talking about what most men found to be a turn on and that most people she knew thought it was normal.
When we talked more she said most men she knew thought it was normal, most men she had sex with.

" argued that it was something that came from porn, was not what I would call normal and there was no equivilant sexual 'thing' for a woman to do to a man. She said that women can 'gush' (I have never done this, maybe I am abnormal) or piss or poo (!) which I pointed out was a totally different thing. But is it?"

So - I said it wasn't, in my general experience and the experience of other people I know, what I would call 'normal'. She then compared it to peeing and pooing. I think peeing and pooing is a niche sexual thing. Peeing and pooing as part of a sexual experience I mean. So my feeling was that peeing and pooing during sex may be comparable to ejaculation on the face in some ways but is still isn't usual sexual behaviour for the vast majority of people.

"I was trying to discuss it with her and point out that her sexual encounters are out of the norm, definitely aren't encounters within a loving relationship, and that ejaculating in someones's face is surely more about disrespect than anything else?"

this bit ^^ is quite important because I think the context of her experience is important to her perception of what is 'normal'

I realise now that I have used the word 'normal' too much and it might have been taken to mean that I think people are abnotmal if they find it a turn on. Maybe I mean 'usual' and 'unusual'?

OP posts:
yellowraincoat · 16/02/2012 17:18

SinicalSanta, I would say that the vast majority of people are turned on by seeing their partner turned on.

WidowWadman · 16/02/2012 17:17

Good blog on what is normal