Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Pro-life / Pro-choice

335 replies

Drowz0r · 12/12/2011 13:37

Admittedly usually something argued accross the atlantic than in the UK anymore... I am curious to know how it ranges in the forum.

Anyone here pro-life or pro-choice? Any specific reason?

OP posts:
SinicalSanta · 12/12/2011 14:42

why did you pick up the one sharp post?

and there are loads of posts who did engage with your question.
we have given reasons, and reasonings, including about the terminology.

LRDtheFeministDragon · 12/12/2011 14:42

Ah, I see. Never mind, we can't all get it right all the time! My own grammar can be shocking, I'm sure.

EatMeDates · 12/12/2011 14:40

I'm pro-choice and agree wholeheartedly that the term 'pro-life' is misleading and is just sinister propaganda. I am pro-life: I'm pro the life of women who don't want to bring unwanted lives into the world.

fridakahlo · 12/12/2011 14:40

And Mollified, you have obviously thought long and hard about your postion morally in regard to abortion but should that give you the right to tell other people how they should feel/what they should do in regard to a medical procedure?

Drowz0r · 12/12/2011 14:40

Haha I was a student a few years ago. Been there done that.

But if it pleases you, please are be correct muy grammarz all u likez

OP posts:
suzikettles · 12/12/2011 14:39

Hmm, what would be the equivalent treatment for self harm if compared to a ban on abortion? It's really not the same thing at all if you think about it.

LRDtheFeministDragon · 12/12/2011 14:39

pootles - that is interesting and unsurprising. Sad

It makes it so clear that until people have understood that women's bodies need to be respected, we will struggle with the same issues again and again.

woollyideas · 12/12/2011 14:39

Pro-life is the general term.

IMO 'anti-abortion' would be a far more accurate term.

Drowz0r · 12/12/2011 14:38

Unfortunately* woops

OP posts:
LRDtheFeministDragon · 12/12/2011 14:38

I think you've misunderstood. 'It's my body' is an explanation.

Btw, it's 'I think many here have misunderstood the post'. I'm sorry, I do hope you don't mind me correcting the grammar - you mentioned being a student on the other thread and I thought you might find it helpful.

Pootles2010 · 12/12/2011 14:37

Interesting piece about this on bbc the other day Molli, I'm sure you'll have seen it - here basically seems to be saying that women who've had unwanted pregnancies are more at risk of mental health issues, but whether they have the baby or a termination makes no odds.

suzikettles · 12/12/2011 14:36

I would fight to the death for your right to stand by that point of view mollified, for your body. Forced abortion is an unthinkable cruelty.

But, when you take that opinion and force it onto another woman's body? It does start to smack rather of I-know-what's-best-for-you...

We need to believe a woman when she says she knows what's best for her. Counselling, by all means. But if a woman says that she's thought about it, she's made the decision, it's best for her - for whatever reason, they are her reasons. I think we have to give the woman the right to bodily autonomy.

fridakahlo · 12/12/2011 14:35

If people think that having to carry a child against it's will is going to endear the child to it's mother, I would have to ask how they came to that conclusion. And if people would rather women died from having an unsafe medical procedure, as used to happen before abortion was legalised, I would have to question in what way that was being 'pro-life'. It should not matter what peoples opinions are on the subject, the facts show that even in the event that it is legislated against, women will still seek them and therefore should have the right to a procedure that is medically safe and legal.
I think that goes a bit beyond 'It's my body'.

Drowz0r · 12/12/2011 14:34

I think many here has misunderstood the post. The limited reasoning (not reason) provided to me, was limited because it lacked an explaination of the reason behind it. Reasoning is the explaination, reason is the point. So I would be given an answer but no reason as to why it was their view point, just that they thought that. Going back to the "killing is wrong" analogy. You can say killing is wrong and why, the laws against it, the social norm surrounding it, the history to it, personal feelings on it. And yes, I'm aware that no one-size fits all but in general terms killing is wrong - kinda missing the point there too.

Pro-life/choice debates always seem to be a lot of incomplete "It's by body" arguements. I don't think it's a universally acceptable answer tbh. To play devils advocate, does that mean it's ok to self-harm? It's your body right? Then why are people encouraged not to do it? And considered ill for doing it? The reasoning is what I'm after, not a bold "my body" answer (to abortion, not self harm :P).

Fortunately, sometimes posts are as blunt as:

"Actually don't bother answering that. I'm not engaging in an argument with a man on this subject."

Which doesn't help anyone understand and only creates enemies.

As I explained, my incomplete view is:

I do find that most feminists are pro-choice too. Regretiblly the reasoning for why is often very strong (good thing) but very limited to "It's my body!". I'm hoping for something a little more than that though. Not implying that it's not a valid reason of course. I just believe even simple questions like "Is killing bad?" can be answered "Yes" - but there is a huge reasoning behind that simple answer.

I'll check out the recent thread (www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/1215597-Pro-life-Pro-choice) thanks for the link.

As for termanology, Pro-life is the general term. Anti-choice is another given to them which personally I find a little distasteful. Pro-choice have also been named anti-life which is equally as bad. I think looking past the initial term and getting to the source is the actual point is well worth the time.

OP posts:
Mollified · 12/12/2011 14:31

OK I'm going to stick my neck out here.
I am not anti-abortion but I do have strong reservations about how it is offered. I do not believe that it is your right to have an abortion no matter what. There are often mental and emotional consequences to the woman that I believe are often not made clear prior to the appointment at the clinic.
I have always found it very difficult to voice any form of anti-abortion point of view as I get flamed for being anti women's rights however I don't see it that way. There are very good cases where abortion is the right choice but there are very many cases where abortion is just the short term easy choice and hang the consequences.
I, personally, would not seek to have an abortion because I do feel that it may be my body however the baby has a body too and I am responsible for that. It is a difficult point of view to have but I have lived with it and I stand by it.

Trills · 12/12/2011 14:27

"Pro-abortion" just does sound so silly, doesn't it?

Abortions for all! There should be more abortions!

SinicalSanta · 12/12/2011 14:27

who the hell is 'pro abortion' - it's just the alternative is worse

woollyideas · 12/12/2011 14:24

I agree with alexpolismum about the 'pro life' label and have to add that I object even more to being called 'pro abortion' (as I was recently) when I consider myself to be pro choice.

SinicalSanta · 12/12/2011 14:23

I'm the same Suzi.

It's an 'Informed opinion' I suppose.

Rather than daft notions of just getting a bit fat and giving birth is only a few hours, and off you go everything's the same. I suspect a lot of 'pro-lifers' think its all a bit of a minor inconvenience, blown up out of proportion by daft moos looking for attention.

Trills · 12/12/2011 14:19

I don't like the word "pro-life".

I am not against life.

People who claim to be "pro-life", are anti-choice, however.

suzikettles · 12/12/2011 14:17

Until a foetus can be removed from a woman's body and gestated elsewhere, without harm to either her or the foetus, I don't see how the argument can really go beyond "it's my body".

The alternative to "it's my body" is forcing a woman to undergo a pregnancy and childbirth against her will. Having been through a, very much wanted, pregnancy and childbirth I find that unacceptable. Interestingly I'm much more pro-choice since I gave birth.

MooncupGoddess · 12/12/2011 14:15

Recent thread here:

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/1215597-Pro-life-Pro-choice

OP: you are aware that 'pro-life' means 'in favour of women having to carry and bear unwanted babies', aren't you?

LRDtheFeministDragon · 12/12/2011 14:11

I agree. Pro life is a really irritating phrase.

alexpolismum · 12/12/2011 14:08

I know this has been pointed out many times, but it's worth doing so again; It's time we stopped using the anti-abortionist phrase "pro-life".

I am pro-choice with regard to abortion. BUT I am pro-life in general, I have no intention of committing suicide, I haven't murdered anyone or supported genocide, etc. Calling anti-abortionists "pro-life" makes the rest of us seem like a miserable death cult. And in any case, when they say "pro-life" I have generally found they are not pro-life as such, they are pro-fetal-life, but not pro-mothers'-lives or pro-abortion-doctors'-lives.

Give them a more accurate name: Anti-abortionists.

LRDtheFeministDragon · 12/12/2011 14:08

I agree ... it's the root reason, and all other reasons/justifications must stem from that one.