Remind me not to read below the line on Guardian articles. The article itself makes excellent points about the inconsistency of Facebook's policy/practice related to hate speech / incitement to violence.
But SO many commentators have cherry-picked phrases from this paragraph:
What Facebook and others who defend this pernicious hate speech don't seem to get is that rapists don't rape because they're somehow evil or perverted or in any way particularly different from than the average man in the street: rapists rape because they can. Rapists rape because they know the odds are stacked in their favour, because they know the chances are they'll get away with it.
Specifically, many have fixated on the phrase bout rapists not being particularly different from the average man in the street and that they rape because they can do it with little comeback. They're insisting this means, "the author believes all men are rapists, therefore I can reject everything else in the article."
How very convenient.