Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

onscenity network - what they think of mumsnet campaign

59 replies

weeonion · 14/06/2011 16:15

"Being inane, however, does not mean ineffective: these slogans compel our assent, and indeed in the case of Mumsnet, emptiness and circularity are fundamental to reaching its audience. The campaign invites us to be part of a ?we? who know true girlhood, against a despicable ?other? who is at best ignorant and at worst bent on destroying it. Attempt to define what girls are or should do, however, and this cosy conspiracy will soon unravel: some associate girls with piano-playing and horse-riding, as if a privileged middle class existence is attainable and desired by all; feminists are unlikely to warm to the virtues of ?pink tea parties and frilly dresses? extolled by others; and those for whom ?playing with dolls? encapsulates innocuous girlishness presumably airbrush Bratz out of the picture."

hmm - what do you think of this from the blog of Onscenity network www.onscenity.org/sexualization/

a network funded through Arts & Human research council funding.

OP posts:
madwomanintheattic · 14/06/2011 17:11
Grin
weeonion · 14/06/2011 17:08

sorry - i should have put a bit more context into that post! i was reading the whole list of blog posts and came across the reference to mumsnet and wanted to find out what you thought.

I didnt intend it to be incomprehensible without the link but was interested in what mumsnetters thought of the idea that the "let girls be girls" campaign was based on "emptiness and circularity are fundamental to reaching its audience. The campaign invites us to be part of a ?we? who know true girlhood, against a despicable ?other? who is at best ignorant and at worst bent on destroying it."

OP posts:
madwomanintheattic · 14/06/2011 17:03

well, i didn't understand it to start with, because it starts in the middle of the blog post, so i clicked to work out what on earth it was on about. it does make more sense when you read it from the beginning instead of in the middle. leaving off the opening gambit is a sure way of making it sound incomprehensible... but i'm sure it wasn't deliberate... Wink

i should be working though, am now 3 minutes past my mn cut-off point!

catinthehat2 · 14/06/2011 16:58

"whether you agree with the cut and paste or not"

wouldn't go that far - I couldn't actually make head nor tail out of it Grin

in my world of style, no 'slogan' 'compels' anything, let alone 'assent'

you have more patience than I do

Jux · 14/06/2011 16:57

I think it is a reasonable view point.

sunshineandbooks · 14/06/2011 16:57

cat couldn't have put it better myself.

They may be getting funding from the Arts and Human Research Council but they're clearly not getting the Clear English Campaign crystal mark

On the plus side, if no one can understand what the hell they're on about, there's nothing to worry about.

madwomanintheattic · 14/06/2011 16:52

oh, there's lots more, cat. interesting to see the mumsnet campaign alongside international equivalents (tis not just a uk entity), whether you agree with the cut and paste or not.

if we only read stuff we agreed with, mn would shut down, surely? Wink

catinthehat2 · 14/06/2011 16:46

incoherent
self indulgent
poorly phrased

meaningless and yes, wanktastic onanistic

will that do?

madwomanintheattic · 14/06/2011 16:43

the first bit makes more sense with the bit you left out - talking about the title 'let girls be girls'. otherwise it doesn't make sense and sounds a bit, well, inane. Grin

i hadn't seen the blog before though - so thanks for link.