Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Mothers, fathers, children and the family heirarchy

337 replies

Ormirian · 10/06/2011 11:18

Thread obliquely about a thread. Sorry.

But as I read more I got Confused and then Shock and finally downright Angry.

I have always thought that having children was a joint project. Both parents have as much invested in the child, both care equally about the outcome. I always beleived that was a given. With good decent men anyway.

When children are small they come first. Always. Simple logistics demand it for a start. The parents gets what is left over in terms of energy, time and affection. In a solid relationship with similar attitudes that is absolutely fine because it's temporary and for a worthwhile goal.

I have heard about fathers being jealous when a new baby arrives. I can understand that I guess - mother's do tend to get wrapped up in newborns, exhausted and emotionally drained. However I always assumed that jealousy of a baby (who also happens to be their child) is something that would be regarded with embarrassment and shame. Something a man would fight against and certainly not mention seriously to his partner. If he was jealous of his own child he'd do his damndest to sort it out himself and not parade his ego in front of his partner and demand she massage it for him!

Have I been suckered by the myth of the New Man? Do most men really feel as if their infant children are 'in the way' and taking up too much of their partner's time? How can you be jealous of the affection your partner shows to your child and the time and energy she gives them? And what happened to supporting your wife/gf in what is a hard time for her too? When she needs your support and love? When she doesn't need more demands?

OP posts:
ilovedora27 · 13/06/2011 20:16

I dont think its rare to find a man who longs for children and loves almost every minute with their child for a minute. I know lots of broody and family men tbh.

blackcurrants · 13/06/2011 20:15

arg, missed last line of post

It's something either parent can do, but you have to WORK on it, both in advance and day to day, to prevent yourself becoming the default carer. And I don't know if it can be done without your partner on side.

It probably helps that my H was raised by his dad, so he doesn't think "this isn't something I can do" - rather, he thinks "this is what a Dad does."

blackcurrants · 13/06/2011 20:12

I DO think 'oh you're so much better at this than me, you do it" is an evil trick of the patriarchy. ANd women who buy into that and don't let their husbands near - well it's such a shame for all of them. One male friend confided to DH "I feel like I haven't had a baby so much as lost my wife" -and he wasn't jealous or making it up - this lady wouldn't leave the baby with her H even for an hour to go to the shops...

D'you know, I wonder if the whole 'mum's the expert, don't let dad mess it up' thing happens with more mat leave? Not that I"d say a word against mat. leave, I wish I'd had more - but the fact that it's MAT leave, not 'family' leave?

Because I live in the USA, I was back at work (part time, but still NOT THERE) when DS was 6 weeks old. And DH was, and still is, the one who drives him to the nursery. Even though he's EBF and I had to lug bottles, etc, to work, DH was in charge of everything to do with getting DS to nursery - that means making up his bottles, his food, now - putting spare clothes in the bag, making sure they have adequate nappies, wipes, suncream etc there. I'm very sad about how soon I had to go back to work, but I didn't have a year, or six months, to become the preferred/expert in things. Apart from BFing, there was nothing I did for DS that his dad couldn't do, too.

I was very deliberate about making some things DH's speciality. DH does the bath and has lots of fun there, and last story of the night and tucks DS into bed, because I BF so get lots of snuggly time with the baby, but DH wanted, and therefore created, a special moment too....

I am very aware that I have an outlier of a husband - a man who longed for children and loves (almost!) every moment with our baby - but the fact that he does all the things he does ( and is primary carer during the summer holidays, as he's a teacher) means that looking after a baby is something either parent can do.

Wellnerfermind · 13/06/2011 19:03

I think it's one of the greatest tricks of the Patriarchy.

Make women feel responsible for childcare and housework and to make them feel guilty for not working and guilty for working.

The threads I've read about he doesn't do it right, or he's not allowed in the kitchen or he's not hanging out the washing he'd do it wrong fill me with disbelief.

exoticfruits · 13/06/2011 18:48

I expect that you are right sunshine but you won't have equality until you delegate. You have to be able to leave DH to find their clothes and close your eyes to the fact he is taking them out in an odd combination! Or not mind that he isn't plaiting DD's hair neatly or that gives them a knife to chop onions for him etc etc.

HerBeX · 13/06/2011 18:10

I absolutely agree with Sunshine

About everythng, it seems. Grin

sunshineandbooks · 13/06/2011 18:06

exotic - do you think the culture of women having to be in control comes from centuries of men refusing to contribute to this arena? I see it as a form of women taking ownership of their responsiblities by saying if we have to do it we'll do it well and make it exclusively our domain.

Like you I see it as counterproductive to what we really want - which is men and women both taking an active role - but I think women pushing men out of the childcare arena is a response to having it all dumped on them for centuries, rather than a resistance to modern men becoming involved. It will take time to change.

exoticfruits · 13/06/2011 16:58

'I am devoted to my DCs' makes me cringe, of course we all, are but you are not the only person who can care for them. It takes a village to raise a DC and it is good for them to make their own relationships at a very early age.

A lot of women have to be in control, as if they are the baby expert and have to show DH how it is done, instead of learning together. If he doesn't do it 'the right way' he is labelled 'incapable'. I agree that a lot of men may be jealous, but a lot of women make him a third DC by having to 'be in charge' and are quite pleased to be the only one to settle the baby etc-instead of going out and leaving him to sort it and learn for himself.

For a short time DCs come first-you are not free to do what you want to do, when you want to do it-but it goes very quickly. You and DP are the ones there for the long term.
As ilovedora says,the washing etc isn't important-remembering why you are together is central-or you are left with nothing once the DCs have gone.

ilovedora27 · 13/06/2011 15:38

totally agree with exotic saying being devoted to your kids isnt a virtue.

I think you can make time for each other. Is it really the end of the world if the washing up doesnt get done tonight, you dont go down the shops or the place isnt really tidy? I dont think it is so I would spend my evenings relaxing with my husband instead.

I also agree with the posts saying some women treat the husband like hes incapable. My husband was home for 4 months when our DD was born whilst I was at uni so he was used to looking after her from day 1 on his own. I dont understand mums who say oh he wouldt do it like me, he doesnt know how to change nappies/do feeds etc so I cant go out.

ComradeJing · 13/06/2011 10:37

Completely agree with your last post Ormirian.

exoticfruits · 13/06/2011 09:43

It does rely on the man looking after the relationship too! Communication is the key.

Ormirian · 13/06/2011 09:29

BTW when I say 'children come first' I don't mean that every waking hour has to be spent gazing in rapt adoration at the infant. I mean that if the baby needs feeding, changing, bathing, entertaining, that comes first even if it is inconvenient. And most things in the parents' lives revolve around that. You don't leavea baby screaming in a cot whilst DP gets his Sunday morning BJ Hmm and if a child is sick one parent might well sleep in his/her bed with him or the child comes into the parent's bed without daddy getting into a strop. BOTH PARENTS have one end in mind - the welfare and happiness of the child - the rest is secondary - for the first few years.

OP posts:
Ormirian · 13/06/2011 09:24

"the father is a bit of an inconvenience or the junior parent in that mother is the boss and never goes off for the day and leaves him to it-or not without a huge list of instructions "

Completely agree. Treat an adult like a child long enough and he will begin to behave like one.

However I don't for one moment beleive that pandering to a man's ego because his nose has been put out of joint by the arrival of a real baby, is looking after a relationship.

jing - if your child is happy with things as they are I don't suppose it matters whether you co-sleep or not. And sleep is hugely important to the whole family. I would take issue if anyone didn't co-sleep because they needed sleep themselves and then their partner insisted on sex every night.

OP posts:
exoticfruits · 13/06/2011 09:07

I think that the parnership is central, you are with someone because you love them and want to have DCs as an expression of that love. The DCs come through you, but they are people in their own right. You are very honoured to have them for a very short time. The parent's job is to produce a happy, caring, well rounded, fully functioning adult-to give them roots and give them wings. Parenting successfully means letting go gradually. When they have their wings and have flown you are left with the two central people for the next 30/40 yrs. You need to still like, love,care for and know the partner and leave your DCs to make their own way and mistakes in life, being there as a support, but not telling them how they should live their life.

It means that in the years of early childhood you need to consider everyone in the family. Being 'devoted' to the DCs isn't a virtue-they need to stay with granny, have babysitters etc.and know that parents are people in their own right-it is a huge burden to have a parent living through you.

It does mean compromise-I am always surprised that when couple's disagree on things like co sleeping the advice often comes up -'tough if he doesn't like it-just tell him'. From some posts you get the impression that the mother and DCs are a unit and the father is a bit of an inconvenience or the junior parent in that mother is the boss and never goes off for the day and leaves him to it-or not without a huge list of instructions (as if he is a baby sitter and not an equal parent).

I don't like the term consensual living (it is one of those things that people have been doing for decades and suddenly someone writes a book about it-like unconditional parenting etc) -but I think that is what everyone should be aiming for -finding mutually agreed solutions and the parents being important too.

On the whole, as long as parents are doing things in the DCs interests, happy parents will make happy DCs.

ComradeJing · 13/06/2011 08:57

Yy to affection but the point is if it's mutual and welcome. I couldn't face sex for a few months after birth as I was touched out. DH was obviously fine with it but I bet lots of men aren't.

How far do you take it though re. Putting children first? I imagine DD would most like co-sleeping and being able to feed Every time she stirs all night. I would rather get a full nights sleep , not worry about squashing DD, and for her to go say 6 hours without feeding.

porpoisefull · 13/06/2011 08:32

I think you do need to make an effort to maintain a good relationship when you have small children, surely that is exactly when effort is required, when it's not easy? Obviously it's a two-way thing though - I'm thinking both sharing the crap stuff, showing appreciation of each other and being tolerant, not 'wife makes herself constantly available for sex'.

Ormirian · 13/06/2011 08:16

blackcurrants - I was talking about specifically the baby and toddler time. Things are much easier for us now. But I do think that expecting people to 'make an effort' to maintain their relationship when there are small children in the house is unreasonable. Any relationship needs to be strong enough to manage without constant ego-boosting in the baby years.

OP posts:
Ormirian · 13/06/2011 08:14

Yes to 'getting a man 'in for sex Grin

Oh bugger! This makes me feel so disloyal to DH - who is a one of the good guys in the main. I am just talking hypothetically.

OP posts:
HerBeX · 13/06/2011 07:40

And yes there were lots of "unspoken" rules in the communue I lived in....

HerBeX · 13/06/2011 07:39

I think one of the reasons MRA's hate this site so much, is because women are talking to each other and coming up with unhthinkable (to the patriarchy) solutions on how to organise the way men and women live with each other.

I find that living with my children and having a lover every now and again, works extremely well for me. Smile

sakura · 13/06/2011 02:56

Thanks for your last post Ormirian Smile Yes I agree with you.. I like men, I do... believe it or not.. I just don'T like patriarchy, which is when men group together to hog resources and power and use women's labour and energies to reach their goals (women's taxes paying for men's wars or banker's bonuses etc)

What I hate about patriarchy is 1) systematic violence against women and children, porn etc 2) war 3) environmental destruction. Those three things are woven into the social fabric because we live in a patriarchy.

If not living with a man in a het relationship means these three things won't exist, (or will exist to a lesser extent) then that's a price I'm willing to pay..

cba with a commune though.. Grin I'm too anti-social. And didn'T HerBex used to live in a commune? She said there were loads of rules!! I'd live on my own with my kids and perhaps a friend or two.

blackcurrants · 13/06/2011 01:41

Heh. I think we have a bit of affection - though "god I'm tired" and "have you fed the dog" does happen to be part of our evening (eg, after the baby's asleep) repetoire, where once there would be snuggling, videogaming, and even - gasp! - hotttt sexxx.

But - we enjoy each other's company, and we get each other's sense of humour. So we laugh about stuff, even about how tired we are, and that's a kind of affection. We got a new mattress delivered recently and we giggled about how we were so excited about 'testing it out' and yes, that meant sleeping - and oh how we've changed - but, yeah - we get time for affection. And we make time for sex. I've noticed my libido has dropped (poss. TMI, sorry) since the birth and I wonder if it's breastfeeding. I hope it is, as I miss it - but still, we have plenty of sex. I just have to recalibrate my brain to 'oh, sex, yes, that's always rather fabulous' from the zillion miles away that it has been, like "oh I'm tired, we need to pick up toys, christ where is my XXX I just saw it, have you walked the dog this afternoon or shall I?" - I don't quite just leap into sex like I used to when I had less on my plate. But it's still possible, and still totally worth the focus Wink

Ormirian · 12/06/2011 22:24

And re affection..... if 'you alright?' or 'fuck me I'm knackered, how are you?' count as affection then I agree with you Grin

IIRC.

OP posts:
Ormirian · 12/06/2011 22:22

"but its not a 24/7 job "

No, of course it isn't.

The 8 hours plus a day paid job, the need to keep the house together and the larder filled, and the sanity of both parents intact, is though. Not to mention the care for any older DC.

Or do you have the secret of being in many places at once ilovedora? In which case, MARKET IT at once! You'll be minted.

OP posts:
PrinceHumperdink · 12/06/2011 21:56

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Swipe left for the next trending thread