Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

"Fear" of men

232 replies

ComradeJing · 10/06/2011 02:38

I have a question that relates to two recent threads so apologies for thread about a thread.

Allhailtheaubergine (hope you don't mind - it's your thread I'm referring to) said that she was worried when she walked on the beach and when a man came between her and her exit she became nervous.

Another poster in AIBU said she was unhappy about a male nursery worker taking her daughter to the bathroom.

The OP in AIBU was completely torn to bits over this. Allhail was given support and most people (including myself though I didn't post) agreed that they would have felt scared and validated her response.

Now my question is why is one response valid and rational and the other one not? Is it because one is a person in a job and the other could be "anybody?" I would imagine you're more likely to be attacked by someone in a job (ie taxi driver, gas man, builder or someone else you would invite into your home) than just some stranger off the street but I could well be wrong.

I suppose I was thinking that if one is a feminist issue then the other one must be too as they are both about a fear of men and what men can do to women.

OP posts:
Riveninside · 11/06/2011 10:21

Given the majority of women have experienced sexual assault and harrassment, either there.s a few very prolofic men or the majority of men aresexual harrassers?

smashinghairday · 11/06/2011 09:59

Dittany - Grin at your horse comments. Are you a Horseenist too?
Actually, a horse will sometimes deliberately throw you but you still go back out there and get back on, you don;t have a fear of all horses forever more and get scared if you see a horse in a field you might be walking across.

dittany · 11/06/2011 08:42

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

dittany · 11/06/2011 08:38

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

smashinghairday · 11/06/2011 08:36

The fear thing I'm not sure makes sense.
I ride horses. I fall off, sometimes quite badly and then I get back on. Again and again.
I am not wary of riding because I have fallen, I do not fear horses because some have thrown me off.

exoticfruits · 11/06/2011 07:51

Unfortunately it isn't news to say x million women walked about today completely unharmed and unmolested and x million DC had a completely normal day at nursery -and so the odd case of either gets completely blown out of proportion.

ComradeJing · 11/06/2011 03:37

I knew that the title of "Fear" of Men was wrong but I couldn't think of a better word when writing the OP which was why I put it in quotation marks.

Dittany I completely agree with you and I do think there is a certain denial about VAW. Perhaps more than denial is the belief that it "won't happen to me" even though it does happen and it is happening every day. We're just so programmed to ignore the little assaults and violence's that we think it won't happen even as it is.

FWIW I do think that it is partly the identity of the person in question: dog walker, taxi driver, man coming home from office with briefcase, nursery worker, builder etc is less of a threat than lone man walking on beach as someone said up thread.

Also as said up thread the stakes are so high especially when dealing with children. There has now been a 3rd nursery worker in 2 years (IIRC) charged with assaults on children. I do think the parent in AIBU is mad to be so worried she won't let a worker get on with his job but I do understand why she would be worried.

OP posts:
AyeRobot · 11/06/2011 01:40

I will just add that I am astounded at the amount of animated posts that have been devoted to one person, with a couple of supporters, expressing hypothetical fear of a man in a childcare setting when the posting of a real life killing of a woman by her ex partner and a link to the Victims of Violence (real, actual killings) thread has elicited a call for a new MN campaign with far fewer supporters.

needanewname · 11/06/2011 00:43

OMFG!!!!!

likale · 11/06/2011 00:40

I don't really agree Ditanny to be honest, whilst it is indisputable that some men do attack women, it it is still a minority of men who do this so to be fearful of a particular individual man attacking you is irrational as the probabilities would suggest that he is less likely to attack you then he is to attack you so it is an irrational position as the empirical analysis is against your position.

dittany · 11/06/2011 00:37

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

dittany · 11/06/2011 00:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

dittany · 11/06/2011 00:34

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

AyeRobot · 11/06/2011 00:11

Of course! I am not arguing against that. I am just saying that it is understandable. I am not saying that it is necessarily healthy. Is that where we are coming unstuck?

Although, in the case of violence against women by men, the stats are flawed because so many incidents go unreported, so how can any woman rationally weigh the risk? They can only go by personal experience.

likale · 11/06/2011 00:07

Even if you have had a traumatic experience in the past, it makes it no more likely for it to occur in the future though so to believe that your past experience will affect the future is to abandon rationality and to live in a world of paranoia though.

AyeRobot · 11/06/2011 00:02

In the hypothetical scenario, it would have a rational basis, though. At least more than those who haven't had a traumatic experience at that hands of a man. Oh, I forget. We should all just "snap out of it". No time allowed to work through stuff that has happened.

If a dog bit you, it's not rational to be scared of dogs.
If you were in a plane crash, it's not rational to be scared of flying.
If you were in a house fire, not rational to be scared of fires.

Maybe not, but entirely undertandable.

likale · 10/06/2011 23:55

ayerobot- Yes I could because the fact of the matter is her predujice regardless of its historical foundation is affecting the present and is having a detrimental impact on the present ie her discrimination against male nursery workers which has no rational basis.

AyeRobot · 10/06/2011 23:49

likale, I know that and you know that. But could you discount her own feelings so readily? I am creating a hypothetical here, but perhaps, in time, she will come around to the viewpoint of the statistical likelihood. But if she were the n of 1 and the outcome was 1, then why would she not be worried?

floyjoy · 10/06/2011 23:32

overthemill
I don't know (or know of) anyone who's been attacked by 'gangs' of young people. I do know women who have been raped by men. I know men (including my P) who have been attacked by men (mugged at knifepoint twice). My P is very wary when out at night in the city - irrationally(?), as statistically he is unlikely to be mugged again (and was of course statistically unlikely to be mugged in the first place).

As I said before, I don't know anyone who is frightened of men. I do know an (elderly) woman who was frightened by by a 'gang' of young people who hung around outside her house drinking and vandalising her garden. Not all 'gangs' are as nice as others. Some areas have higher levels of crime than others. That effects how people perceive the risk.

The immigrant argument just doesn't make any sense at all.

Basically, the viewpoint that women are irrational is the dominate cultural view of women. Good to have it confirmed by you that men, who are luckily for them statistically even less less likely to be the victims of sexual assualt/rape than women, are the unfortunate victims of female irrationality. It must keep them all in at night. Poor men. What are womwn doing to them. It's like womens' lib gone mad.

likale · 10/06/2011 23:17

"Just like you think the world dislikes boys based on your experiences, perhaps she dislikes men having intimate access to her daughter based on her experiences."

Her experiences make it no more or less likely that her daughter will be abused by a nursery worker so they are irrelevant. Her daughter at nursey and her past history are independent events and have no effect on each other.

overthemill · 10/06/2011 22:57

it's such an ignorant attitude, in the same way that I used be fearful of 'gangs' of young people wandering around all together, now I have teens of my own I am not in the slightest bit off put. I know them and am no longer fearful generically. ' Like i hate immigrants but the one that work with me is alright'

exoticfruits · 10/06/2011 22:46

Sorry-spelling gone wonky! Time for bed!

exoticfruits · 10/06/2011 22:45

Tongue in cheek-annoyed with mothers who descriminate against perfectly nice young men doing their job!
(Although someone on the toilet thread said her mother had screwed her up as an adult with her suspicious attitude.)

AyeRobot · 10/06/2011 22:45

But why do you think her mother caused it? Maybe her father did? Maybe she had reason for her fear.

Just like you think the world dislikes boys based on your experiences, perhaps she dislikes men having intimate access to her daughter based on her experiences. And me being wary of certain people and situations, based on mine.

Or maybe all are just beliefs that can't be extrapolated. Or maybe they can. It's all real.

HerBeX · 10/06/2011 22:40

No I was picking up on your comment about fears being caused by mothers.

As opposed to life experiences....