Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Banning Page 3 v right to 'Free Speech'

88 replies

HollyFP · 18/02/2011 12:21

I had an argument discussion with someone on FB recently about Page 3s. I am voting for a ban, they started bleating on about right to 'free speech' and this being the first step to censorship and where would we draw the line...(that tempted me further but I resisted the goading)

Now I'm all in favour of free speech in theory but not when it's harmful to the vunerable, victimised or those who can't speak up for themselves. Page 3 is the 'socially acceptable' part of porn it seems in this country.

I was getting fairly pee'd off with this person ignoring my arguments about Page 3 and instead insisting that censorship is a dangerous line to tread.

What do you say to someone when they either miss the point or think the right to free speech comes above women's rights, IYSWIM?

OP posts:
FlamingoBingo · 18/02/2011 12:47

This is an interesting read, Proles.

David51 · 18/02/2011 12:46

I dont think the Free Speech argument is valid as there is no 'speech' involved with pictures of Page 3 girls.

Censorship of visual images is hardly a new thing - for example the ASA can ban adverts that are felt to be offensive; also under the Obscene Publications Act there are limits too what you are allowed to show on magazine covers

Prolesworth · 18/02/2011 12:44

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Prolesworth · 18/02/2011 12:42

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Original poster
HollyFP · 18/02/2011 12:40

higgle that's my point, I am trying to support those that are IMO opressed/victimised. That's why I don't support free speech with regard to Page 3, nor would I support free speech if it were racially abusive etc.

How do feminists reconcile the two?

OP posts:
higgle · 18/02/2011 12:38

"Now I'm all in favour of free speech in theory but not when......"

The thin end of the wedge/slippery slope of opression!

AliceWorld · 18/02/2011 12:38

I've seen a great thing which summarises the whole free speech thing but I don't recall where. But in a nutshell, we don't all have equal access to free speech anyway. If you have privilege you have free speech cos you can access the resources. If you don't, you don't have free speech. I'll see if I can find it...

Original poster
HollyFP · 18/02/2011 12:37

It stopped this morning after the OP (who created the link to the Page 3 ban, and not the person i was arguing with) came back with a nice middle-ground response that was a bit of a thread kill!
(Have just PM-ed you too)

OP posts:
Original poster
HollyFP · 18/02/2011 12:33

In my mind, a ban of Page 3 is radical but necessary. It would create the much-needed discussion amongst the public as to why such a thing is needed.

Following on from that would come discussions and changes to other areas of sex discrimination, porn, prostitution etc.

It has to start somewhere, right? Is there another way of reducing the disturbing amounts of Page 3s without resorting to a ban?

OP posts:
FlamingoBingo · 18/02/2011 12:31

Is the discussion on-going? PM me and I'll add you to my fb friends and come and join in! Wink

Original poster
HollyFP · 18/02/2011 12:29

My replies were like that Flamingo, but the reply-ee seemed to have their head in an awkward and dark place... Wink

It's like democracy gone mad. We can't stand up to protect one sector of society without others demanding'Free Speech' or some other bollocks reason for not actually understanding the issue.

OP posts:
Rhadegunde · 18/02/2011 12:28

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

FlamingoBingo · 18/02/2011 12:25

Well, if it's a FB row, I come on here and ask for reinforcments from my feministing FB friends! Grin

I would point out the known links between the objectification of women and violence against women and ask them why they wouldn't want to stop an activity that we know leads to more women being raped.