Link here.
"Under this new bill, the only rape survivors who would be able to receive funding would be those who were able to prove that their rapes involved ?force.? If your rapist drugged you, intoxicated you, or raped you while you were unconscious, you don?t get coverage. If your rapist used coercion, you don?t get coverage. If this is a case of statutory rape ? that is, if you are a thirteen-year-old child, raped by someone outside of your family ? you don?t get coverage. If you?re an incest survivor over the age of eighteen ? if, say, years of abuse only culminated in a pregnancy after your nineteenth birthday ? you just don?t get coverage. And if you live in a state that doesn?t distinguish ?forcible rape? from ?rape,? you might not qualify, meaning that no matter what the circumstances of your assault were, well, sorry: You might not get coverage."
I know there's probably not a lot we can do about it, given that it's in another country (althoug please tell me if you think we can). But I just wanted to post out of outrage, and because it is often laughed off when I say things about how women's current rights can easily be eroded and removed. This is an example of how that happens.