Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

For those who need it, evidence that women in the UK do not have equality and suffer institutionalized discrimination.

37 replies

Thistledew · 18/01/2011 13:29

This new research report makes interesting reading: Unsustainable: the quality of initial decision-making in women's asylum claims. The full report can be downloaded from the website here

There are long held concerns about the treatment of women seeking asylum in the UK, and the research findings only deepened this concern. Looking at a sample of forty-five cases from three UKBA regions, Unsustainable found that:

? the UKBA did not accept the credibility of women's asylum claims in the vast majority of cases;

? women were refused asylum on grounds that were often arbitrary, subjective, and demonstrated limited awareness of the UK's legal obligations under the Refugee Convention;

? the UKBA case owners at times displayed a striking failure to understand the nature of the persecution from which women might flee. This poor understanding led to case owners doubting the credibility of applicant?s accounts for no good reason. For example:

? One woman ? whose passport had been confiscated by her husband, and from whom she had been subjected to threats, abuse and humiliation ? was informed by the UKBA that she was not considered a victim of domestic violence because her husband had only tried to hit her once

? One refusal letter made repeated reference to an arranged marriage when considering the case of a woman who had been forced into marriage at fourteen to a man who had subsequently abused her over many years

? At one asylum interview, the case owner stated that they had never before heard the term ?female circumcision?

? a disproportionately high number of the asylum refusals issued to women were subsequently overturned on appeal. 42% of the initial refusals in our sample were overturned by an independent immigration judge (the average across all cases is just 28%); this number rose to 50% when including rulings made after the reconsideration of an initial appeal 


? case law and Country of Origin Information was used selectively or unrepresentatively
Responding to the research, the UKBA has acknowledged for the first time that its own internal figures also show that a disproportionately high number of the refusals issued to women asylum seekers are overturned on appeal.

The executive summary is available here .

OP posts:
chibi · 18/01/2011 17:25

the idea of choosing a sample in order to reflect trends in a population is not a radical one, i hope

if the sample is chosen carefully, there is no reason why it would not be valid to draw conclusions from

i would want to know more about their sampling technique/rationale before i judged 45 cases as inadequate for the conclusions made

HopeForTheBest · 18/01/2011 17:20

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ on request of its author.

HopeForTheBest · 18/01/2011 17:11

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ on request of its author.

sethstarkaddersmackerel · 18/01/2011 17:11

thanks Thistledew. OMG at someone in such a responsible position as that not having heard of female circumcision Shock

Thistledew · 18/01/2011 17:08

Seth- a 'case owner' is the UK Border Agency civil servant who makes a decision on the persons's claim for asylum. You need to have passed 5 GCSEs to be qualified for that role.

Ilythia- Asylum Aid, who prepared the report, hope to persuade UKBA to let them deliver some training to improve the way the case owners deal with cases. They had to beat UKBA round the head with hard evidence before they could get a concession that things need to improve.

OP posts:
sethstarkaddersmackerel · 18/01/2011 16:58

what is the 'case owner'?

ilythia · 18/01/2011 16:57

TBH this on it's own
'At one asylum interview, the case owner stated that they had never before heard the term ?female circumcision? '
had me saying WTFuckign fuck? How can you work with asylum seekers and not have heard of this?

What will the report achieve though?

Thistledew · 18/01/2011 16:52

JBellingham - if you read the OP and the report you will see that the importance of it is that it does provide statistical corroboration of discrimination. 50% of cases where a woman appeals against a refusal of asylum by the border agency are later allowed on appeal to the court, compared to the 28% allowed when a both women's and men's cases are considered.

That is an extra 22% of women who are routinely disbelieved or thought not to be at risk of suffering a significant degree of harm, as compared to men who are believed.

What is so impressive about this report is that is does provide a quantifiable example of discrimination in practice.

Dittany - quite.

OP posts:
dittany · 18/01/2011 16:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

JBellingham · 18/01/2011 16:24

I see no comparisons or statistics to compare to men here? Are you just moaning that the asylum system is flawed (I might agree with that) or that women get a worse deal than men?

dittany · 18/01/2011 15:43

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Thistledew · 18/01/2011 15:12

Anyone interested?

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread