Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Reading 'The Feminine Mystique'

31 replies

sethstarkaddersmummyreturns · 30/10/2010 12:03

it's bloody terrifying. I am up to the 4th chapter and so far it could almost have been written today.

I think my head is going to explode. Anyone else read it and had their head explode?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
nicwantsone · 31/10/2010 12:49

I think I've gone way off topic guys, sorry, my mind always seems go off at a tangent. Haven't read The Fem Mystique but am going to track it down at the libary!

nicwantsone · 31/10/2010 12:46

dittany I agree with the finding a decent man(tipsy writing last night, shouldn't be done as some of my writing is not the point I intended to make or if I was even making a point!)
My now(sort of) point was that Jane Austen and these other female writers often has a selfish female that undermines th milder more subservant character, making inaccurate choices for them all in the name womanhood (light gleams in nicwantsone's head - maybe that's the point these authors were trying to make!) However in the end they have to either reign it in a little bit or step up and grow a pair of balls (Fanny - Mans Park) - the message seemed to me to be that balance (being domestic and independent)is needed from both sexes.
Jo was also very critical of Meg wanting to be a good wife when it was what she wanted - which is quite interesting - to me anyway!Women sometimes really are very critical of each other.
On the serving men vs. being a mother - mothers and their sons, that to me is an area where women are often more than happy to serve them in a very different way to their girls. That to me is still serving men and gives the message from a very young age that that is what women do for boys/men? Or am I looking into it too much?! Very interesting discussion though!

dittany · 30/10/2010 21:58

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

nicwantsone · 30/10/2010 21:28

To me it's a reaction of the times and the times will never change because women will always have a mothering streak. It's also the situation she's been brought up in. Marriage/work/motherhood isn't always like that for everyone.
When Jane Austen completely made Jane in Pride and Prejudice (one of the sisters) seem weak for wanting to be a mother and a good wife but she wasn't stupid by anymeans and not half as selfish and Little Women where Jo is supposedly better and more fiesty to the other main daughter (is it Meg? it's been a while) but again is so much more selfish. Don't even get me started on Mansfield Park and Wuthering Heights - they'd be locked away now. People look for perfection, I think it doesn't exist! I'm not a housewife before people start to critise but I wonder if it is just women are far too hard on each other, including Jane Austen and Charlotte Bronte. They are both valid roles and you haven't failed if you prefer one to the other in my opinion or try to mix both.
Book Club fab idea, I love books if you hadn't notcied!
Wow what a long message I have written, time for me to get a life!!

EvilAntsAndMiasmas · 30/10/2010 21:17

I willl definitely join in, I have my friend's copy.

Those sentences are scaaaary.

BitOfFunderthepatio · 30/10/2010 21:09

I would join in with that- I still have my copy, I think.

StewieGriffinsMom · 30/10/2010 21:01

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

jamaisjedors · 30/10/2010 20:43

I agree about the madmen link - I was thinking about that today.

I don't see that we are supposed to hate Betsy though - surely there are lots of hints to how trapped she is and how unfulfilling her life is - but that's another discussion. Could be interesting though if other people are watching/have watched mad men.

I started it a couple of months ago. At first found it v. slow and too much of a period piece but am finding food for thought there now, and the out and out sexism that the series seemed to be rejoicing in seems to have given way to more of an exposé of women's lack of choice.

Am now off to bed with Betty (Friedan)!

TryLikingClarity · 30/10/2010 20:36

I have plenty of ammo in my arsenal already, but it's always good to have a reserve Wink

sethstarkaddersmummyreturns · 30/10/2010 20:02

That's right TryLikingClarity, it's non-fiction.
hope it is useful ammo for you!

OP posts:
TryLikingClarity · 30/10/2010 19:59

I've never heard of this book, must have a look for it.

I'm guessing it's a study, rather than a novel? I bookmarked those links to the chapters dittany, will have a read of them.

I'm due to return to my degree in Jan after taking a year off on maternity leave with DS. Some older women have been scathing to me about my choices to 'leave' DS, so I'd like to read this book, learn more about what people think and have thought about a women's place.

PosieComeHereMyPreciousParker · 30/10/2010 19:40

Oooo, may have to join you in the December book club!!

sethstarkaddersmummyreturns · 30/10/2010 19:38

yes exactly, that stuff about the New Woman is really interesting.

let us hope history follows a similar trajectory and we have another really effective wave like the Second.

I remember Faludi in Backlash saying that the history of women's liberation is like a slanty corkscrew so you get these spirals down but then when you spiral up again you are further up.... Hope she's right.

OP posts:
dittany · 30/10/2010 19:32

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

sethstarkaddersmummyreturns · 30/10/2010 19:30

apologies to the partners and children of anyone else whose head actually explodes as a result of this thread....

Bloody hell Sprogger.

OP posts:
sprogger · 30/10/2010 18:47

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

sethstarkaddersmummyreturns · 30/10/2010 18:20

hello all, thanks for those links Dittany.

To clarify why it is making my head explode: because there are just so many parallels with the situation today for me/lots of other women of my generation.

I don't think I'd appreciated before the extent to which the 50s movement towards femininity was a backlash; a lot of the 50s housewives were college-educated and were struggling with the question 'is this all my education was for?'

Betty Friedan was a magazine journalist and she's very good on the way magazines started to write about how wonderful the home was, where once they'd promoted careers. Jamaisjedors - exactly, that kind of domesticity is back in now.

There's even a line early on about manufacturers making a padded bra for little girls - and here we are with the Let Girls Be Girls campaign Confused

I'm about to start the chapter on Freud; I'm guessing she'll be talking about how he was used to give a pseudo-scientific basis to the idea that women's place was the home, just like Baron-Cohen and the neurosexists are doing now.

Ditt - the edition I have has a foreword by Lionel Shriver and she talks about Mad Men. I watched it for the first time as a result on Wed - really good though it's going to take some time to get into it I think. Shriver thinks the name Betsy is a deliberate reference to Betty Friedan.

OP posts:
StewieGriffinsMom · 30/10/2010 17:18

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

dittany · 30/10/2010 16:51

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

jamaisjedors · 30/10/2010 16:43

Actually reading it at the time it seemed all a bit 1950s and a little dated, I think that now that kind of domesticity is back "in" and it is probably more terrifying now than when I read it.

jamaisjedors · 30/10/2010 16:42

Can we have it for a book-club discussion? I won't be able to read November's book, but I have read this one and still have my mum's copy.

jamaisjedors · 30/10/2010 16:41

I read it when I was 18 or so and it put me off being a housewife (well that and seeing my mum accountable to my dad because he was the one earning the money) for good.

I have read it a couple of times, must get it out again and re-read it as a mother.

dittany · 30/10/2010 16:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

foreverastudent · 30/10/2010 14:24

I read it when i was 20, after breaking up with exf. I remember it having a big imoact in me. I went straight into reading the whole woman.

I cant remember much of the detail, can someone give me the jist?

StewieGriffinsMom · 30/10/2010 14:19

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.