Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Cleavage

92 replies

jibbet · 18/09/2010 19:33

Call me a Prude, Old-fashioned, Whatever (I'm sure some will!) but watching the Boris Johnson interview I noted with some queasiness the deep cleavage revealed by one of the mumsnet interviewers.

It irritates me intensely to see women in professional situations, e.g. Jackie Smith in Parliament, or my locum GP, revealing inches of titillating cleavage. For a young female doctor to be flashing breasts while in consultation in a small room with male patients strikes me as risky. In these business situations, men are still required to be covered from neck to toe in sober suiting and restrictive collar and tie, surely women should also sport sober attire?

Such displays undermine credibility, compromise respect and distract colleagues - some might get the wrong idea.
Maybe some women want that?

OP posts:
SpeedyGonzalez · 18/09/2010 21:02

Goblin, that's a rather splendid post! Grin

Goblinchild · 18/09/2010 20:56

Elderly person's historical viewpoint coming up. Regard it as a curiosity.
In the 70s some of us were trying to be taken seriously by a male-dominated establishment. Which many of them found difficult, because we were just women, and therefore had limited uses.
We wanted them to hear what we were saying and think about it, and many of us felt that wearing clothing that distracted their limited brainpower was shooting ourselves in the foot.
Attractive woman talking, possible communication. Add cleavage and their brains switched over. So many of us chose to avoid confusing the situation for the males.
Doesn't mean that it's relevant now, or that it was right then but it was what a lot of us did.
Think of it as me trying to teach Y6 maths with a flowerpot hat and clown makeup. Possible, but you have to fight the class being distracted whilst trying to make them understand and follow a complex series of ideas.
Don't know if that's helped or just poured fat on the fire.

ClimberChick · 18/09/2010 20:48

I apologise for being flippant OP, my sentiment was correct, it was badly worded (though your counter was undignified). I still find your post wrong on so many levels, that I don't know where to start and still a bit Shocked by it. So I will bow out now.

Ta ra

SpeedyGonzalez · 18/09/2010 20:46

dittany - I was actually thinking the same thing...thought thread maybe belongs in Chat or elsewhere.

Rofl at Blah! Though I doubt anything, even mucho cleaveage, could make Boris look more of a gibbering buffoon than he already is.

How exactly do people like him pull? Surely power can't be that powerful an attraction?

MillyR · 18/09/2010 20:46

This is what always happens. Choufleur comes on and blames feminism because someone like Jibbet has come on to a thread and made statements with which most feminists would disagree.

I don't think the woman in the Boris Johnson interview is showing a large amount of cleavage. Having breast fed children for many years, many people have seen all of my breasts in public places, and I find it really difficult to empathise with people who find the sight of a bit of cleavage to be in any way something worth noticing or passing comment on.

I think the only way people are going to get over their really adolescent boy approach to breasts is if they see women breast feeding more frequently.

I just find it absurd that the woman in that Boris Johnson video who is really dressed quite demurely could be considered to be dressing dangerously. How very, very odd.

jibbet · 18/09/2010 20:39

Delighted that Lady Blah got a laugh - we need more of that. I'm sure Boris enjoyed the display of female attributes. His reputation goes before them

OP posts:
dittany · 18/09/2010 20:38

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LadyBlaBlah · 18/09/2010 20:35

I can confirm that the cleavage on display at the Boris interview had absolutely no effect on the outcome, process or validity. Biscuit

Hilarious thing to post in the Feminism topic

SpeedyGonzalez · 18/09/2010 20:28

abouteve, I know what you mean about ample bosoms being different to dress. Sigh. Grin

I'm amazed by the posters who are making the gigantic Olympian leap from "risky" to "rape". Wow. Impressive gymnastics, that! I took it as meaning that some 'vulnerable' people can take more of a shine to you than you may enjoy, IYKWIM, particularly if you're a doctor. It's like the therapist/ patient relationship - ripe territory for infatuation. Such encounters make me cringe with horror, and I'm sure that ALL medics, both male and female, are very aware of this.

StewieGriffinsMom · 18/09/2010 20:28

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

jibbet · 18/09/2010 20:23

err is Climber really a chick?

OP posts:
jibbet · 18/09/2010 20:22

I'm sorry Elephant that you have such difficulty clothing yourself. I'm lucky to have never found it much of a problem.
In my line of work I can just throw on any old thing. As I grow older, I increasingly enjoy the freedom of actually not caring very much what people think of me - especially not my outer appearance.

I agree the situation for women in most 'developing' countries is really really terrible and I wish there were more we could do about this. But men still rule the world and they don't seem to care very much.
As for being safe in this country, the better you protect yourself the better your chances.

OP posts:
ClimberChick · 18/09/2010 20:21

err is the OP for real?

TheSistersGrim · 18/09/2010 20:19

I want to be respected as a women even if I look like a woman. I shouldn't have to cover myself up to be respected. I have enormous tits but that doesn't mean that I am asking for it Hmm.

StewieGriffinsMom · 18/09/2010 20:12

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

jibbet · 18/09/2010 20:10

Elephants,
Though a feminist of the first rank in terms of demanding equality and respect, there are many degrees and varieties of feminism/feminists, some of which I might think extreme, ridiculous and counterproductive to the cause.

OP posts:
ElephantsAndMiasmas · 18/09/2010 20:05

Have you now, jibbet? Well personally I am not going to scour the internet and spend hard-earned cash for something to make me acceptable to those who might faint at the sight of a couple of centimetres of cleavage. Turning on the TV, reading the papers or walking down the street must be such a strain.

Sorry, I am being sarcastic because I find this incredibly hard to stomach. IMO those who put the blame for rape and assault on clothing are doing rapists a favour. Rapists rape, clothes don't "get you raped". This is a pernicious rape myth and part of the reason that when women report a rape, instead of people giving them support, they ask "what were you wearing?".

Jibbet - you do know that women in Afghanistan and Saudi who couldn't be any more covered up, still suffer from rape, assault, harrassment etc? It's an illusion to think that wearing e.g. a high-necked shirt can keep you safe.

jibbet · 18/09/2010 20:01

Sequins! when I say 'the' rampant male, I said 'the' rampant male - not the lot of them!

OP posts:
ElephantsAndMiasmas · 18/09/2010 20:00

er, choufleur, I think feminists are usually the people arguing that women should be allowed to wear what they want without fear of assault or comment. So please don't let this put you off!

At least, I think of myself as a feminist and that's what I would say.

scottishmummy · 18/09/2010 20:00

poor clinical knowledge,inappropriate professional manner,poor judgement all certainly compromise and distract colleagues. chosen attire doesnt usually.although the odd that bag those shoes may cross my mind (esp the males)

jibbet · 18/09/2010 19:59

Elephant
I've seen advertised little lacy things you can stick in low-necked clothes to cover up if you want to

OP posts:
jibbet · 18/09/2010 19:57

It effing does matter what effect your dress has on men. YOU suffer any unpleasant consequences

OP posts:
Sequins · 18/09/2010 19:56

"the rampant male" indeed, you are implying all men are latent rapists. This is misandry.

ElephantsAndMiasmas · 18/09/2010 19:56

I forgot - hormone changes affect breast size too, so something which is fairly "covering" three weeks of the month is, erm, not so for the fourth week.

I think that dressing "professionally" is much harder for women to achieve (in fact I started a thread in this section about it ages ago). In part this is to do with the kind of clothes that are made and sold IMO. Men don't have parts of their body that they would reveal on a night out (IYSWIM :o) that they would be considered "unprofessional" to reveal at work. So men's clothes (formal or informal - except shorts, but they're not exactly night out material) tend to cover up from the collarbone down to the feet, and at least the top of the arms. But women are expected to cover up their cleavage at work, but to "get it out" for evening events. Likewise short skirts are terribly bad in the office, but fine for a night out with colleagues. As a result women's clothes come in a huge variety of shapes, and it can be really hard - depending on fashion - to access affordable clothes of the type considered "professional". For example last autumn when I changed jobs and had to be smarter, the fashionable skirt length was bum-skimming, or longer but tight over the arse. As I had no wish to reveal my arse to my fellow commuters and co-workers, I had to scour the shops for literally days before I could find something marginally acceptable.

Anyway what I'm saying is that clothes that show off cleavage are available, in fact sometimes they are all that is available. It doesn't bother me in the least if a professional person has their cleavage on show. I'm not a 13 year old boy and am perfectly capable of keeping my hands and my eyes to myself.

scottishmummy · 18/09/2010 19:56

yes.and...