Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Porn

804 replies

msrisotto · 02/09/2010 16:20

Tentative!

Um, the way I see it is that a lot of porn (I have heard) is appallingly violent and degrading for women. This stuff, ideally wouldn't exist and should be banned (how, I don't know, but ideally).

However, the porn that I have seen or enjoyed is not. I wouldn't enjoy porn that is degrading.

So, why is all porn bad? (in some people's opinions?) If it isn't degrading and is equal in its approach, for the entertainment of others, then I don't see any harm.

Is the argument that you don't get the 'good' porn without the bad?

Don't flame me please, I really want this to be a considered conversation.

OP posts:
TheButterflyEffect · 06/09/2010 10:42

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Beachcomber · 06/09/2010 08:25

I totally agree with you Carmen that lots of things are horrible - not just porn.

I don't think one justifies the other however and I think there are lots of things we can do about it. If we just shrug our shoulders and accept the abuses that happen in porn as some sort of inevitability then we will never get anywhere.

Blinks how about you tell us what the holes in our arguments are rather than just declaring there are holes.

Personally I have similar objections to porn mags and lads mags as I do to filmed porn. I have already discussed my experience with and objections to amateur porn. I think a lot of gay porn has a theme of submission and domination that replicates hetero porn so I object to that too. All the stuff we have said about desensitisation/attitudes towards sexual identity/expectations of a partner apply to gay porn too.

Can you define what you mean by erotica - it means different things to different people?

"and to imply that if you're not against porn per se, you must therefore support the rape and torture of women is dense. to the max."

Why?

I am against porn because terrible things happen to women in the making of porn.

Logically people who are not against porn are either ambivalent about what happens to these woman, don't care about what happens to them, are ignorant of what happens to them or are titillated by what happens to them.

I don't see how you can be against rape and misogyny and be pro porn - they go hand in hand. (I also don't see how you can be against racism and be pro porn - racist stereotypes are rife in porn).

An inconvenient fact for many people, I know. And one they often choose to ignore in their self indulgent pursuit of titillation and orgasm.

blinks · 05/09/2010 23:48

there are so many holes in the hardcore anti-porn arguments here you could strain pasta in em.

what about erotica? what about gay porn? what about amateur porn? what about porn mags and lads mags?

are all the people involved in these rapist misogynists too? even the females?

and to imply that if you're not against porn per se, you must therefore support the rape and torture of women is dense. to the max.

CarmenSanDiego · 05/09/2010 23:45

I live in America. I find ninety nine percent of what's on television gross. Pharmaceutical adverts for drugs people don't need. Airbrushed women with improbable figures, endless crime dramas with sexy female victims (special victims unit ffs), dumb comedies where the father is always right, reality tv shows offering false dreams, 'news' programs which sensationalise crime and illness (this woman's aneurism is a ticking time bomb, watch tonight on 'when things explode in your head!') etc. etc.

Porn is part of it. But all these images are offensive, distorted versions of reality. I fully acknowledge that but don't see what you can do about it. I don't want to watch so I turn the tv off.

Maybe they damage society but all you can do is vote with your remote control and encourage others to do likewise.

claig · 05/09/2010 22:56

In the same way, I think that extreme porn, extreme violence, extreme horror, extremely disturbing images etc. are a war against the population, a war against society, and that is why decent societies have obscenity laws and try to limit these harmful images. There is a battle in society between thise who want a free-for-all type freedom of expression and those who want censorship. A balance has to be struck.

Beachcomber · 05/09/2010 22:45

Claig that is disgusting.

Ok - another reason to hate porn it is a fucking weapon of war.

Beachcomber · 05/09/2010 22:42

The crazy thing is that most porn doesn't even attempt to hide the woman hating element - quite the contrary in fact.

I just looked at Ben Dover's homepage and at the top there is an advert for 'teens' being 'violated' for example.

The blurb for most porn is blatantly misogynistic - all the better to entice consumers to watch it.

The porn makers make no attempt to hide the fact that porn is filmed degradation and abuse.

Weirdly there still seem to be lots of people who will jump to defend porn in ways that the porn makers themselves don't even bother with.

Prolesworth · 05/09/2010 22:32

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

claig · 05/09/2010 22:30

found a reference to it
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00996.html

AandO · 05/09/2010 22:18

That is terrible claig, I didn't know that.

dittany · 05/09/2010 22:17

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

dittany · 05/09/2010 22:10

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Prolesworth · 05/09/2010 22:09

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

dittany · 05/09/2010 22:07

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

claig · 05/09/2010 22:05

there have been news reports that the Israelis have in the past jammed Palestinian TV stations and broadcast hard-core porn. But they are not the only ones. I can't remember if it was also done against the Serbs.

dittany · 05/09/2010 22:03

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Prolesworth · 05/09/2010 22:02

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

LadyBlaBlah · 05/09/2010 22:02

And yes, 'they' destroy much more than women, arguably even themselves

LadyBlaBlah · 05/09/2010 21:59

Can I just pick Carmen up on her comparison of Porn barons to "sales managers". Please. Shock

AandO · 05/09/2010 21:58

His name is Ben Dover Grin!

Sorry Blush

claig · 05/09/2010 21:57

"Claig, I don't even know why you are arguing it."

I don't think it is as black and white as saying that they want to destroy women. I have seen a documentary about the porn director Ben Dover. I don't think he wants to destroy women. I think that they have other motives, which are worth trying to understand.

AandO · 05/09/2010 21:55

What, really? A weapon of war Shock

Prolesworth · 05/09/2010 21:53

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

claig · 05/09/2010 21:52

"I can't see who gets anything out of it. I don't think even the money argument for those at the top ultimately explains it fully."

porn is sometimes used as a weapon of war. It is broadcast into the homes of the enemy. It takes over their normal viewing. This gives an insight into one of its real goals. It is used to insult and taunt the enemy, to break their moral fibre, to destroy the bonds of decency that hold their society together and to demoralise the population.

dittany · 05/09/2010 21:52

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.