Please or to access all these features

What we're reading

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

Jane Eyre

85 replies

ipanemagirl · 06/01/2009 21:58

I've got a horrendous cold and have spent 3 days mostly in bed. So I started to read this again, starting at Thornfield. It's just so so so so so good. I love this book. It's a few years since I've read it, I can't believe I'm OLDER THAN MR ROCHESTER. When I first read it he was like an Ancient Old Man. It's so weird! He's 35! And there are loads of stout women in their 40s! I so don't want to be one of those stout women like Grace Poole!
I read books so differently now, I used to just skim landscape and interior descriptions, now I really read them. It's a different book.
Also, why does Jane accept his Parisien stories and the description of his general dissipation? Wouldn't a girl at that time be genuinely horrified? She's as unbothered as if it was 2009! Strange Brontes.

OP posts:
ipanemagirl · 08/01/2009 13:29

Bink I can't type very quickly because I'm kneeling in response to your post. You are my lit hero I doff my cap.

OP posts:
Bink · 08/01/2009 13:26

Ref to "CE" should of course be to "CB" (but that's basically a QED all on its own!).

Bink · 08/01/2009 13:24

Helen is Maria, Pan - CB's oldest sister, who died at (and possibly because of) the unspeakable school they were sent to.

My thing about JE (which absolutely squares with the fairy-tale resonance, and is why Helen has to die, etc.) is that it's fairly bare, & visceral, Freudian dream-work in novel form* - making myth (via symbol) out of autobiography.

That explains for me why the different stages of the book are so different, so almost incompatible. The Red Room, and "we talk, I believe, all day long" do not belong in the same world, let alone book.

And that being the case I am not sure that I can do much more with it, as a book, than see it in its immediate (ie CE's personal) psychological context - I can't (unlike lots of other Victorian literature) give it a wider social contextual relevance. Though perhaps some Jung (per the fairy tales) would apply - but that's the same idea, really.

*though not as bare & visceral as Villette (passim).

Threadworm · 08/01/2009 13:14

I think I have recalled just one strand of the story, then. The one that resonated for me. There are others too, clearly.

IorekByrnison · 08/01/2009 13:12

But her strength doesn't come entirely from a sense of duty. She identifies herself very early on in the book as a "rebel slave".

Regarding the romance, I was quite convinced. As far as I remember it, their relationship was full of the kind of banter that suggests a strong intellectual understanding.

ipanemagirl · 08/01/2009 13:10

lol pan!

OP posts:
ipanemagirl · 08/01/2009 13:09

RE : the blindess, as I read it again I'm struck by how gothic the atmosphere is and in a way the blindness seems in keeping with this and appropriate to the plot in terms of Rochester getting punished by fate for his youthful blindness/naivete.

Also it's like the Beast being near death when Beauty returns, the vulnerability of the Beast/Rochester is very satisfying somehow, he needs her completely. And it demonstrates entirely her lack of self-interest and proves the purity of her love particularly as she's of independent wealth by the end and could tell him to sling his hook and run off with a gilded fancy boytoy.

OP posts:
Threadworm · 08/01/2009 13:08

Yes. Passive aggressive not that different from slave morality. And like you I see the blindness in terms of her control of Rochester.

lalalonglegs · 08/01/2009 13:06

I'm not a huge fan of Jane Eyre; I find Jane quite passive aggressive and the romance quite puzzling. Obviously it is complete lust but CB seems to want to dress it up as something else in deference to the time. I always saw Rochester's blindness as a way of Jane being able to take even more control of him. I much prefer Wuthering Heights where the carnality is much more upfront and no one is effecting to be a martyr.

Pan · 08/01/2009 13:04

And remember Helen, Jayne's only friend at the orphanage??and why did Helen have to die so young? They missed such a trick on the 'feminst road story' there. Had the Brontes never heard of Thelma and Louise FFS??

Threadworm · 08/01/2009 13:03

Good point re Jane's strength of character, Iorek. I don't think it tells against the slave morality reading, but it is certainly in tension with it -- in an interesting and good way. One of the ways that literature is better than the analysis of it is that it can contain and thrive on contradiction.

Her strength of character, though, is founded on a sense of duty? Whereas N (scared to mention his name now) has a character-based notion of morality and would regard 'duty' as a self-abnegating and craven form of morality.

And I'm interested in the Rapunzel point. So there are at least two fairy stories JE resonates with -- Rap and Beauty & Beast. No wonder it is a powerful story.

LightShinesInTheDarkness · 08/01/2009 12:57

Have to agree with Threadworm - I had always thought that the blindness is a penalty for his sins.

IorekByrnison · 08/01/2009 12:51

This is very interesting. I like your analysis threadie, although I felt that Jane's own strength is actually quite central to the book, and the dialogue between Jane and Rochester suggested to me that they related as equals, despite the disparity in their social positions (although it is some time since I read it). I wonder if her strength of character to some extent subverts the implication of slave morality inherent in the tale.

An aside re the blindness - was reminded of Jane Eyre when reading Rapunzel to dd recently. I had forgotten that the prince is blinded by the witch in the tower. At the end of the tale Rapunzel finds him and his sight is restored. The underlying stories are really quite similar I think.

christywhisty · 08/01/2009 11:46

Going back to the OP I think we forget 30's was probably middle aged in victorian times.
None of the Brontes except Charlotte lived beyond the 20's and Charlotte was 39 when she died.

Threadworm · 08/01/2009 11:42

Apology accepted

Pan · 08/01/2009 11:11

I do apologise, Threadworm. I see why you thought it rude. I'm trying to avoid overuse of the emocion to indicate humour, but maybe I should have put it in here. I DO respect your exhibited grasp of the Big N, as ipanemagirl says, and the desperate undrgraduate thing was me being a bit robustly playful, though I totally accept it can lend to offence and I withdraw and apologise without reservation.

I love reading Jayne Eyre. IT's often quoted as the favourite 'girls' novel, but that doesn't matter. It is the pleasure in the narrative as ipanemagirl puts it,and the romance of pride and unrequited love. One can deconstruct stuff til the cows don't come home, but I try to keep Jayne beyond that.

ipanemagirl · 08/01/2009 10:12

Threadworm, I'm always fascinated to hear lit crit of any book that's deeply in my consciousness because I've always been very ignorant of lit crit. of any kind. I think I tend to be fairly lazy and just see books like Jane Eyre as 'of their time' and think of the Brontes as parson's daughters with extraordinary imaginations. But given their time, isn't it an act of defiance of their gender roles that they even had the cojones to write these books at all? That's how I tend to read them. Certainly Jane Eyre is pious and needs a man to triumph as in the critique you outlined. But in pure 'pleasure in a narrative' it works for me as Beauty and the Beast works. And I love that he loves Jane when she is not drop dead gorgeous and that who you are matters in the long term not who you appear to be.

OP posts:
Threadworm · 08/01/2009 09:51

I am, actually, really offended my your remark, Pan. The consequences of oppression on women's character is a worthwhile theme to put up for discussion on a woman's website. It pisses me off a lot that a man should sail in and trash the idea with pure namecalling.

Threadworm · 08/01/2009 09:12

And, also, Pan, why do bloody rude? Undergrad desperation, 'absrtouse'.

I have often wanted to discuss these thoughts about Jane Eyre, and the arrival of a thread on her on Mumsnet was a welcome opportunity. Don't appreciate someone coming along and abusing the very thought.

Threadworm · 08/01/2009 09:01

'''isn't it a good debate to have...

Threadworm · 08/01/2009 09:00

I don't think my presentation was abstrouse pan. The ideas are pretty simple. And isn't is a good debbate to have -- about the extent to which women's oppression has sometimes made them petty and bad? We tend to regard victims of oppression as somehow made noble by suffering. But the reality is often so very different. It is degrading to be powerless.

Flamespar · 08/01/2009 07:55

Jane Eyre is on my "try again" list for this year. One of the only books I have never finished - I think because it is tainted with GCSE English memories (turns out all the films rearrange the plot - how is that going to help you cheat?!?)

I have WSS here from where I was meant to be doing a course, bought the books, then couldn't do it - will read that afterwards

NancysGarden · 08/01/2009 07:26

Will endeavour to get hold of a copy of vilette. I'm sure I tried to read it as a teenager without success.

AnnieLaurie · 08/01/2009 04:59

Bink - Villette is my favourite, favourite book. I love the Brontes, and Villette is such a special book. Not many people know it I think.

The descriptions of the nun bits and Lucy out in Villette at night on opium are amazing.

I always cry when she finds herself back with her godmother and goes to sleep wetting her pillow with tears saying 'Quite tranquil' over and over or something along those lines.

Going to have to read it again now...

Pan · 08/01/2009 00:29

sounds like undergraduate desparation to impress with abstrouse presentation to me.

Swipe left for the next trending thread