Ok so Darcy didn’t tell people about his sister nearly being Wickham’s victim in order to preserve his own Mr D legend and status and future options, rather than speaking out on it for the good of the other girls? So he shows morally sinful pride/self interest in that sense?
That would be a totally fair criticism morally. Same charge also on the slate against Fitzwilliam as the co- guardian of Georgiana then, too. He knew everything.
But Darcy or Fitzwilliam, back in the real Regency world with brutal public morals, could not have been free to do that realistically, surely? because it would have terribly compromised Georgiana’s chance of marriage if the story came out.. Despite her being a young and lovely gazillionaire. So they are stuck.
I’d be a bit disappointed if JA’s only comment on ‘Pride’ wrt Darcy was just he was a bit of a social snob, on guard of his wealth against adventureresses (? If that is a category). Surely JA’s making a deeper political point about sex equality or lack of, with the Pride and Prejudice characterisations, but I can’t quite work it out.
Very good point made above about Mr Bennett. He just sits back and waits for a boy child to inherit everything, putting all the labour on to Mrs Bennett to marry off their girls when no son comes.