Please or to access all these features

What we're reading

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

A Tale Of Two Cities, Four Month Read Along. (Title edited by MNHQ at request of OP)

285 replies

DesdamonasHandkerchief · 03/01/2026 11:24

Welcome to a 6 month read along of Dicken’s 12th novel A Tale of Two Cities
We will be reading it using the following format, and discussing the chapters on the first day of the following month: (So January chapters discussed from 1st Feb onwards etc)

A Tale of Two Cities

6-Month Read-Along Calendar

Start: 1 January 2026
Finish: 30 June 2026

🗓️
JANUARY 2026

Book the First: Recalled to Life
(Chapters 1–7)

✔ Book the First complete

🗓️
FEBRUARY 2026

Book the Second: The Golden Thread
(Chapters 1–6)

🗓️
MARCH 2026

Book the Second: The Golden Thread
(Chapters 7–12)

✔ Midway through Book the Second

🗓️
APRIL 2026

Book the Second: The Golden Thread
(Chapters 13–18)

🗓️
MAY 2026

Book the Second: The Golden Thread
(Chapters 19–24)

✔ Book the Second complete

🗓️
JUNE 2026

Book the Third: The Track of a Storm
(Chapters 1–15)

✔ Novel complete

I know very little about this book other than its set in revolutionary Paris and London, let’s hope it’s a goodie!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
26
SydneyCarton · 03/05/2026 14:53

@HelenaWilson I always thought Sydney would have done all right with a nice clever widow who had a bit of life experience and gently bossed him about a bit, keeping him out of the decanter and in chambers a bit more. Maybe with a couple of sons to whom he could be a reserved but kindly stepfather. Basically a more toned down version of the woman Stryver marries!

InTheCludgie · 03/05/2026 09:18

I've not yet finished, I still have a couple of chapters to go (I know how it ends already though!). Agree that this is a very readable Dickens however, due to life in general and focusing too much on the WP list I fell massively behind so switched to audio, which was a game-changer for me.
I'll definitely look out for the new adaptation and may watch the Dirk Bogarde version as I love an older movie.

HelenaWilson · 03/05/2026 00:33

And Sydney Carton is far more interesting than Darnay!

Darnay isn't a heroic character. He keeps needing to be saved, and it's Sydney who has to keep saving him. The one time he does something decisive - going off to France - he just causes everyone a lot of trouble and grief. He and Lucie are both a bit wet. I should think if Sydney had married Lucie, he'd have been a bit bored with her after a while.

I will describe her as shortly as I can. She was intensely sympathetic. She was immensely charming. She was utterly unselfish. She excelled in the difficult arts of family life. She sacrificed herself daily....

Beth March.

Benvenuto · 02/05/2026 22:18

@cassandre- that quote about the draft is so apt! Will post more when I have read the essay.

I can’t help wondering if part of the apoeal of bad / poor women for Dickens is that they do/say more which gives him more scope for characterisation, as he is very theatrical in how he depicts characters. There’s no a lot of scope for his talents if a character is perfectly behaved all of the time.

@FuzzyCaoraDhubh- you may have the reason why Lucie has red hair in the new version (to trick us into thinking that she is interesting).

DesdamonasHandkerchief · 02/05/2026 18:04

That description by Woolf is definitely Lucy - a self sacrificing martyr is ever there was one.

OP posts:
cassandre · 02/05/2026 18:03

Just one more thing to @Benvenuto : you're right about Valjean not being evil; I was lazy when I used that term! About the parallel between him and Sydney Carton, maybe it's more that they both go from being not particularly virtuous to becoming paradigms of virtue/goodness. Or going from not perceiving their own lives as meaningful, to finding a way to instill their lives with meaning, by helping others.

I guess women like Lucie don't get to go on this psychological journey because they are completely virtuous and self-sacrificing in the first place!

cassandre · 02/05/2026 17:59

Btw the representation of female solidarity and collective female action embodied by Mme Defarge and the Tricoteuses is very interesting. The Tricoteuses were historically real apparently (women who watched the public executions while knitting) but I think the idea of Mme Defarge putting coded names into her knitting was an innovation by Dickens? At any rate it's a scary image of what women acting together can do. The men are much less scary in comparison.

The 'good' women in the text exhibit a more positive version of female solidarity: Lucie appeals to Mme Defarge as a 'sister woman' and mother, Charles Darnay's mother wants to find the younger sister of the dead peasant girl and help her. But these instances of would-be female solidarity don't amount to anything; it's only the Tricoteuses who are effective (and how feminist are they, if they're shoring up a revolution led by men, and are happy to sacrifice other women along the way?).

cassandre · 02/05/2026 17:51

I don't think Angels of the House were meant to be ginger! 😂

cassandre · 02/05/2026 17:49

https://www.literaturecambridge.co.uk/news/professions-women

Link to the whole essay. Woolf said she had to 'kill' the Angel in the House before she herself could start writing.

cassandre · 02/05/2026 17:46

Like you @Benvenuto I'm very sceptical that it was Jane Austen who set the trend for angelic heroines! I haven't read Austen for a long time but as I recall, her heroines are quite feisty.

I think a lot of blame can be traced back to Christianity and the dichotomy of virgin/whore, or Mary/Eve. I've read plenty of medieval literature where the women are either very good or very evil (so more like stock characters or types) whereas the men are more complicated, more human figures. This is probably down to most early Western literature being written by men! Yet there are also plenty of literary texts that present women in more complicated ways. Think of Chaucer's Wife of Bath for example.

A lot of Dickens' women fall into the good/bad dichotomy (though some of his 'dark' women, like Edith Granger in Dombey and Son, or Lady Dedlock in Bleak House, can be complex and sympathetically presented).

I think his most appealing/interesting female characters are the ones who aren't the heroines (and who are often lower-class): Mrs Pross, Aunt Betsey Trotwood in David Copperfield, the comic Mrs Nickleby... I'm sure there are more.

The Victorians do seem to have been particularly attached to pure, virginal heroines. There's the 'Angel in the House' poem, published in 1854 by Coventry Patmore (an obscure name!), and the way Virginia Woolf identifies and attacks this trope in her 1931 essay 'Professions for Women' is absolutely wonderful.

I just looked the essay up and here is a quotation from it that sounds SO MUCH like Lucie:

You who come of a younger and happier generation may not have heard of her - you may not know what I mean by the Angel in the House.

I will describe her as shortly as I can. She was intensely sympathetic. She was immensely charming. She was utterly unselfish. She excelled in the difficult arts of family life. She sacrificed herself daily. If there was chicken, she took the leg; if there was a draught she sat in it - in short she was so constituted that she never had a mind or a wish of her own, but preferred to sympathize always with the minds and wishes of others. Above all - I need not say it - she was pure. Her purity was supposed to be her chief beauty - her blushes, her great grace. In those days - the last of Queen Victoria - every house had its Angel.

I have to laugh at, 'if there was a draught she sat in it'!

CutFlowers · 02/05/2026 16:37

Thank you @DesdamonasHandkerchief for hosting and to all for interesting comments. The opening scenes and the end section were also my favourite parts of the book but I loved it in its entirety. Definitely agree that the getting of a doctor for the traumatised girl was the least likely plot point but then maybe the evil brothers were just so entitled that they didn't see anything wrong with their behaviour/didn't care who knew. I loved Dr Manette in all his guises.

FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 02/05/2026 16:19

Thank you for so many interesting posts @cassandre 🙏 I enjoyed them and completely agree with you.

To me, a red-haired actor implies a spirited nature and that's not fair Lucie.

Benvenuto · 02/05/2026 14:59

@cassandre- I also enjoyed the Freudian insights! I’m coincidentally reading Mansfield Park, where whoever wrote the introduction seems to think that Jane Austen is to blame set the fashion for angelic heroines with Fanny Price. I’m not entirely convinced as there were certainly angelic young women in fiction before then (eg Clarissa Harlowe or Mme de Tourvel) & to be fair to Jane Austen subsequent “angels” seem to lack Fanny’s ability to be bitchy astute about other characters. That said, it’s definitely an interesting issue to analyse about why male mid-19th century writers all default to such insipid portrayals of young women as it’s not just Dickens (I can think of examples in Thackeray, Trollope & Wilkie Collins too). It’s not that they are incapable of writing interesting & well-written women in other circumstances - as Mme Defarge illustrates.

I’m not entirely convinced by the Sydney Carton - Valjean parallel either. There is a parallel with Valjean giving himself up in court for another, but its hard to think of him as evil (given his original crime was to steal to feed his family). The most Dickensian characters for me so far in Les Mis (although I’m quite behind in that thread) are the Thenardiers. Both authors are really good though at capturing the reader’s attention & emotions with those dramatic and very visual scenes (eg Carton walking towards the scaffold or Valjean falling from the ship).

I’m also shocked that TV Lucie won’t have golden hair as it’s probably her defining characteristic (apart from fainting). I do wonder if the TV writers will succumb to the temptation to make her more interesting.

Thanks to @DesdamonasHandkerchiefas this is a book that I wouldn’t have read otherwise. I’m also quite keen to see the old film too as apparently Christopher Lee plays the Marquis!

cassandre · 02/05/2026 13:52

Aw thanks @DesdamonasHandkerchief , it's just another perspective on a very rich text!

I took a course on literature and trauma at uni and so I fear I often perceive literature now through that lens.

But I love this novel because it is ultimately very hopeful; it's not just about trauma but about the possibility of recovery.

DesdamonasHandkerchief · 02/05/2026 13:50

Brilliant analysis @cassandre, so many aspects that hadn’t occurred to me (or Gradesaver!)

OP posts:
cassandre · 02/05/2026 13:36

Sorry I'm going into my excited mode of posting everything that comes into my head, but I'm done now! 😁

cassandre · 02/05/2026 13:35

Btw I remain cross at Darnay the would-be do-gooder for travelling to France and endangering his whole family. @Benvenuto , you said I also liked the touch of Darnay thinking that he had made a mistake travelling to France.

Bloody well right he has made a mistake! 😂

And yeah, Lucie isn't very convincing as a character; I think her role is largely symbolic. Mme Defarge is far more intriguing.

And Sydney Carton is far more interesting than Darnay!

cassandre · 02/05/2026 13:28

I was brought up in a very religious family, and I'm no longer religious, but the repeated Bible verse of 'I am the resurrection and the life' was so beautiful, it made me weepy despite myself.

I was also thinking of Old Testament versus New Testament themes in the novel. Mme Defarge and the revolutionaries are like Old Testament figures in that they have an ethos of vengeance (Mme D's BFF is actually named Vengeance!). The Old Testament says that the sins of the fathers will be visited upon the children and the children's children, until the third and fourth generation. This fits with Darnay and his child needing to be punished for the sins of their ancestors, regardless of their own personal innocence.

Whereas Sydney Carton becomes a kind of Christ figure, bringing New Testament redemption by paying for a 'sin' he did not commit, and breaking the cycle of vengeance and generational trauma.

The idea of Lucie as light and Mme Defarge as darkness is quite Biblical as well.

And then all the blood imagery, don't get me started, ha.

Carton's prophetic speech suggests redemption for France as a nation ('I see a beautiful city and a brilliant people rising from this abyss'), but in fact, politics in France would carry on being messy for a long time to come. As we see in Les Miserables!

Speaking of Les Miz, the intro to my Penguin Classics edition has a section on similarities between A Tale and Les Miz. The editor argues that Jean Valjean is a kind of combo of Dr Manette (long years of unjust imprisonment, redemption through a daughter) and Sydney Carton (another figure who moves from 'evil' to 'good' and devotes himself to other people's happiness).

cassandre · 02/05/2026 13:14

I'm very excited about the film adaptation! But a redheaded Lucie, what were they thinking?!

cassandre · 02/05/2026 13:13

Thank you @DesdamonasHandkerchief for all the info and for hosting! I agree this was a brilliant read. I was kind of dreading reading the last section because I remembered Sydney Carton's death (from the first time I read the novel many years ago), but I had completely forgotten the story of the evil Evremonde brothers and the rape of the peasant girl, and Mme Defarge turning out to be the sister of the dead girl... it was all very gripping and I enjoyed the last section far more than I expected! There were so many different threads coming together, it was very satisfying.

The whole story recounted in Dr Manette's long letter is insanely Gothic, it's so dark and melodramatic, but I'm fond of Gothic literature! Good point Desdamona about the implausibility of the evil brothers taking the trouble to get the girl a doctor in the first place. The notes in my edition talked about 'le droit de seigneur' (the idea that a lord from the Middle Ages onward had the right to have sex with young women on his estate, especially on their wedding night) and said it was more of a myth than historical fact. Of course, in the story of the dying peasant brother, his sister isn't actually raped on her wedding night, but he refers to the 'shameful rights' of nobles, so it seems to be an allusion to 'droit de seigneur'. Yet even if 'droit de seigneur' isn't historical fact, it seems that Dickens is using the story of the girl's abduction and rape (combined with the additional grisly elements of the torture of her husband and murder of her brother) to symbolise the bigger picture of aristocratic atrocities toward peasants and the lower classes.

I agree too that there are too many coincidences! Uncanny doubling is another feature of Gothic novels though, and all these sets of doubles are exciting: Darnay and Carton, the twin Evremonde brothers, Mme Defarge and her martyred sister, the steadfast Mrs Pross and her nefarious brother.

To me the novel is very interesting from the point of view of trauma, and how different characters exhibit symptoms of trauma. Dr Manette's loss of memory and return to his shoemaking state happens twice in the novel, when a fresh reminder of trauma becomes too much for him to handle. But there is also the sinister repeated words of the dying peasant girl, as she names her family members and counts to twelve. It's fascinating that Dickens gives Mme Defarge a back story that makes her a victim of trauma as well; in her case, she handles the trauma by becoming a kind of abuser herself.

And these individual familial traumas are all part of the much larger historical trauma that France is going through.

Freud wrote a famous essay on trauma called 'Repeating, remembering and working through', where he argues that until you've actually managed to 'work through' a trauma, you're condemned to just keep re-enacting it - you're still 'trapped' in the original event as it were. Dr Manette eventually manages to work through his trauma with the support of his family, but the peasant girl dies in her traumatised state, and her sister (Mme Defarge) keeps perpetrating the violence until she too is killed.

I should say I'm not a Freudian, but some of his ideas are interesting!

It is moving that it is such a damaged person (Sydney Carton), as you say @LadybirdDaphne , who becomes the bringer of redemption in the novel.

DesdamonasHandkerchief · 02/05/2026 13:11

Also agree with @Benvenuto that Lucy is a bit insipid to inspire such total devotion. Sure she’s ‘nice’ but apart from that it’s all about the looks.

OP posts:
DesdamonasHandkerchief · 02/05/2026 13:07

It was the forthcoming adaptation that made me want to finally get round to reading this book. I’m so pleased such a lovely lot of people were happy to read it too!
they’ve done a good job of making Kit Harrington and his co-star look alike in those pictures. But a red headed Lucy - Quelle Horreur, everyone knows she’s ‘The Golden Thread’.
I imagine it will be an Autumn release, or even included in the Christmas schedules. Can’t wait. Hope they don’t make it too gory though.
I watched the 1958 Dirk Bogarde movie on YouTube as soon as I finished the book and really enjoyed that.
That made me laugh about The Vengenge’s mother Ladybird and good point about what a modern character Sydney Carton is.

OP posts:
Benvenuto · 02/05/2026 12:43

@ChessieFL- excellent - perfectly timed for the readalong!

However, that article is not telling me about the most important role (who will play Mme Defarge?)!

ChessieFL · 02/05/2026 12:25

@Benvenuto there’s a new TV adaptation coming later this year!
www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/2026/a-tale-of-two-cities-first-looks-kit-harington-francois-civil-mirren-mack

Benvenuto · 02/05/2026 12:06

Really enjoyed the end - it (& the opening scene) made the rest worth reading. I was completely caught up in it by the final scene to the guillotine.

There was a comparison between Lady Macbeth & Mme Defarge earlier on this thread - I loved that Mme D gets to wield weapons herself, rather than delegating that to her husband.

@DesdamonasHandkerchiefis absolutely right about the coincidences (& I would add that Lucie really isn’t interesting enough for such a sacrifice) but Dickens’ writing was so good that not only did I not care, but I really enjoyed the revelations. I also liked the touch of Darnay thinking that he had made a mistake travelling to France.

I’m also wondering why this is not a GCSE text (at least not for my DC) as it would be fantastic - relatively concise, has a love story & lots of fast-paced action so something for everyone. Or why there has been no recent film adaptations?