Please or to access all these features

What we're reading

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

The Salt Path

65 replies

Sadcafe · 17/05/2025 12:20

Anyone read it and is it a good read

OP posts:
GardenGaff · 27/05/2025 20:51

SirChenjins · 21/05/2025 18:32

I gave up a few chapters in. The couple were ridiculous and quite frankly, deserved everything they got through their sheer stupidity - to the extent I started to doubt it was a true story.

This.

It’s a work of fiction, every single chapter to be taken with a huge pinch of salt!

Daysofcake · 27/05/2025 20:43

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 27/05/2025 12:53

i thought they lived off just the tax credits they used to get. They wouldn’t apply for unemployment or housing benefits at the start as they (she) was somehow convinced that was beneath them. It just read they they didn’t think of themselves as like homeless people, until they reached the point they were sleeping rough in a city and no, there was no significant difference with them, and they both started to think sensibly.

I also wondered if this was supposed to be his book, not hers. There’s a small reference to Moth making notes as they went, but then he went back to study and she wrote the book. (And of course he was bankrupt with debtors, makes much more sense for her to be the one earning royalties).

Yes - when I was trying to find out more about them I did find one early interview with them that suggested that Moth’s real name is actually Ray, so I assumed that Raynor is a kind of composite non de plume for both of them. (It would be weird if they are actually Ray and Raynor!)

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 27/05/2025 12:53

i thought they lived off just the tax credits they used to get. They wouldn’t apply for unemployment or housing benefits at the start as they (she) was somehow convinced that was beneath them. It just read they they didn’t think of themselves as like homeless people, until they reached the point they were sleeping rough in a city and no, there was no significant difference with them, and they both started to think sensibly.

I also wondered if this was supposed to be his book, not hers. There’s a small reference to Moth making notes as they went, but then he went back to study and she wrote the book. (And of course he was bankrupt with debtors, makes much more sense for her to be the one earning royalties).

lifeturnsonadime · 27/05/2025 10:44

I liked parts of it because I am walking the path in stages and enjoyed the descriptions.

I didn't like RW. I didn't think she was particularly fair on Moth at points.

C8H10N4O2 · 27/05/2025 10:38

ThreeFeetTall · 27/05/2025 00:47

I listened to the audio book and enjoyed it, especially the discussions about attitudes to homelessness…how people treated them differently if they said they sold the house vs if they said they were homeless.

I was incredulous that the type of people they seem- slightly hippy, running a small holding- didn’t know how to go camping. and many of their other crazy decisions.

I enjoyed the audiobook as well and I liked the fact that it wasn’t fluffed up to make the writer into a more sympathetic character.

I’m interested that the audiobook seems to be more popular than the written book as I’ve seen exactly this divide in other discussions on this book. Possibly Winn comes across as a more recognisable person when narrating than in writing.

MAFSQueen · 27/05/2025 00:51

I enjoyed it,but it wasn’t as good as I was hoping it to be (from what others had said).

Highiy recommend reading Wavewalker for anyone who likes this kind of thing @Sadcafe

ThreeFeetTall · 27/05/2025 00:47

I listened to the audio book and enjoyed it, especially the discussions about attitudes to homelessness…how people treated them differently if they said they sold the house vs if they said they were homeless.

I was incredulous that the type of people they seem- slightly hippy, running a small holding- didn’t know how to go camping. and many of their other crazy decisions.

TooExtraImmatureCheddar · 26/05/2025 23:05

I really hated the way she presented everything as someone else’s fault. The whole situation with losing their house sounded so fake. They clearly walked themselves into that and then bleated that they couldn’t afford legal representation despite being in really serious trouble. There is no way that they had a magic paper that would have proved them right about everything but the mean old judge wouldn’t look at it. Just no. Then they couldn’t possibly be expected to live in council temporary housing. Then the benefits they qualified for/didn’t qualify for made no sense. She didn’t qualify for any help because there was nothing wrong with her and she was expected to get a job to live on, but instead they tried to live on the small amount Moth was entitled to, which isn’t supposed to support two adults. They also just waltzed off into the blue and abandoned their student-age children and she was bitchy about them changing degree to something practical rather than an arts subject (unsurprising if the kids were much more focused on making a living, after watching their parents lose their actual home).

Aramox · 26/05/2025 22:49

Read it while walking the sw coast path with our luggage being taxi-dropped and staying in hotels. Felt well smug.

senua · 26/05/2025 22:39

I heard that the manuscript was written by Ray for Moth as a sort of love letter. Then others got to read it and it was suggested that it be published. So it wasn't originally written for public consumption, which might explain some of the unfiltered comments in it.

I've read the book twice and felt more sympathetic on the second reading. On my first reading I was concentrating more on their situation (and there is always the niggle of doubt, due to lack of detail and explanations) but the second reading was more about her love for Moth and the dread of losing him. You'd have to have a heart of stone not to feel for her.

SmokyWood · 26/05/2025 22:21

I enjoyed the first book but it’s hard to take the following ones seriously knowing how big a success it was and the money they must have made. Possibly not how it works but I doubt they were penniless any more.

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 26/05/2025 18:32

I read it, it was one for our book club so I stuck with it.

Like others, I found them frustrating and annoyingly snobbish. The whole walk starts because “of course” they couldn’t just present as homeless and be put in emergency accommodation until a council flat could be found, they were too good for that. There was a bit later on in the book when they get to a city, and suddenly they aren’t “wild camping”
but “sleeping rough” and she finally seems to get they have been homeless the whole time and really aren’t “better” than the other homeless people just because they were homeless on the coastal path, not in a city/town. Yet still this didn’t seem to trigger them to engage with finding out what benefits they could claim or seeing what help there as from the state. They took their tiny tax credits, and lived in extreme poverty rather than engage with help. Then got angry that middle class people weren’t offering help.

it did make me want to walk the path though, I just wanted to do it like the people they sneered at, with nice hotels, good wine with restaurant dinners and someone dropping my bags to the next hotel I need to walk to (if anyone knows which companies do this, I’d be up for it, sounded delightful - I don’t do camping)

Daysofcake · 26/05/2025 17:40

SirChenjins · 21/05/2025 18:32

I gave up a few chapters in. The couple were ridiculous and quite frankly, deserved everything they got through their sheer stupidity - to the extent I started to doubt it was a true story.

^^This - I started reading it after a friend gave it to me, saying she had found it incredibly sad and moving. They started to really annoy me, though — the beginning didn’t quite ring true. DP is a lawyer and said the legal situation (with the judge not accepting the evidence in time), would be very unlikely to have happened in the way she presents it. I couldn’t find any real life evidence of the case, either, which would normally be around in the public domain, so I concluded that her name must be a pseudonym, because there’s no trace of her unless connected to the book publication. (Try it — it’s impossible to find out any corroborating evidence about them in real life beyond the book publicity!)

The whole time in the book they seemed to regard themselves as a special case who should be allowed to do things like nick stuff, trespass, wild camp etc. just because they were middle class people in a tight spot! I had to abandon it 2/3 of the way through!

HarryVanderspeigle · 26/05/2025 17:39

I liked the sound of it, but just got too bored to read on. Probably got half way through. Getting books from the library means you have to read in 3 weeks, or return and I couldn't be bothered to renew.

upinaballoon · 26/05/2025 17:29

They seemed to be down to the last desperate crust rather often. I listened to Anne Reid reading it. I like her but it was so mournful.

I saw the ad in the cinema. If Jason Isaacs and Gillian Anderson were in any-old-film-about-a-couple I'd give it a go. I wonder about this one, but I might go and see it. I can't remember the details of the book - well, a bit about a lot of sheep-shearing - so I won't remember enough to see if they keep the film true to the book.

SirChenjins · 21/05/2025 18:32

I gave up a few chapters in. The couple were ridiculous and quite frankly, deserved everything they got through their sheer stupidity - to the extent I started to doubt it was a true story.

Sadcafe · 21/05/2025 18:29

Really sounds as if it’s a marmite book, still debating whether to fork out and give it a go

OP posts:
SmokyWood · 20/05/2025 22:34

She’s not the most likeable but I did enjoy it and am looking forward to the film.

RockyRogue1001 · 20/05/2025 22:33

Finished it
Hated it
Didn't like them

TheHouseofGirth · 20/05/2025 22:27

MonkeyTennis34 · 20/05/2025 08:28

I didn’t like it and didn’t finish it.
I found them to be feckless.

At first I found them relatable. Then they began to annoy me.
Deeply feckless.

TheHillsIsLonely · 20/05/2025 22:25

Yes and yes.

I've read The Salt Path and Ray's other books. I couldn't put The Salt Path down. I found it to be real, raw and - in places - relatable and inspirational. I'm looking forward to seeing the film when it is released but I'm glad that I read the book first.

Portakalkedi · 20/05/2025 22:13

MonkeyTennis34 · 20/05/2025 08:28

I didn’t like it and didn’t finish it.
I found them to be feckless.

same here, and boring too

proximalhumerous · 20/05/2025 22:09

I saw the film last year and got a bit bored with watching them pack up and set off for a day's walking 75 times. The two main actors were good though.

NattyTurtle59 · 20/05/2025 22:06

I haven't read the book but the film is getting good reviews here. I'm trying to decide if I should watch it at the weekend.

AndAllOurYesterdays · 20/05/2025 22:01

I've read the sequel and found the couple utterly infuriating. There is a bit where they don't have the right boots or socks and suffer with blisters, which is just so simple to get right, especially for experienced walkers. I normally love books about the restorative powers of the outdoors but didn't like this one at all

Swipe left for the next trending thread