Please or to access all these features

What we're reading

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

Bienvenue à Marseille | 2025 The Count of Monte Christo, read-a-long

984 replies

AgualusasLover · 15/11/2024 13:18

Following the success of the continuing Dickensalongs, Fallen Women and various other classics, please join The Count of Monte Christo read-a-long, kicking off on 1 January 2025.

The ultimate tale of revenge, with swashbuckling, chicanery and bare faced lies - The Count of Monte Christo has it all.

Editions: most important point is an unabridged version, coming in at just over 1,200 pages. This thread discusses the various translations – the Penguin Classics, trans by Robin Buss is very popular and the one I am reading but what you have already is likely fine and the nuances of translation are always fun to discuss.

What’s the best translation of The Count of Monte Cristo? • We Love Translations

I’ve been thinking about the best way to read-a-long. There have been red-alongs by the day, in chunks and every which way.

I think we have two options:

There are 118 chapter and my proposal is we do one a day, starting on 1 January, 2025. (W&P and all the Fallen Women books worked well this way)

We could also convene weekly e.g. no spoilers until Sunday and read it as it was released, in 18 parts c.65 pages per week. (I remember The Woman in White worked well this way and so do the Dickensalongs)

For now, I have assumed a chapter a day as it has served us well so far, if the majority strongly object, I have put placeholders in my copy breaking it down and can update in readiness for January.

Schmoop very handily has chapter by chapter breakdowns. Here is the Intro https://www.shmoop.com/study-guides/count-of-monte-cristo/

MN meet up in Marseille 2025!

Bienvenue à Marseille | 2025 The Count of Monte Christo, read-a-long
OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
MotherOfCatBoy · 26/03/2025 11:00

And there’s the Pierre v Dolokhov duel in W&P.. about 1810 or so in the story?
I think there’s a duel in Eugene Onegin too. Onegin always got on my nerves tbh..

On Noirtier - the detail I loved was that his epée was in his CANE! How cool is that! I think we see the cane in the chapter where Villefort goes to his father’s lodgings in Paris, but we don’t know it’s a murder weapon, we just think he’s a rather dapper chap! You have to be pretty fit and nimble to fight a duel so the cane was either purely decorative or a ruse…

FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 26/03/2025 10:42

Yes, that's right. It was in 'Nicholas Nickleby'. I remember being surprised that duelling was still a thing then. Crazy stuff! An honourable criminal indeed :)

TonTonMacoute · 26/03/2025 10:35

The whole duelling thing is crazy. It was basically banned everywhere because hot-headed young men were killing each other far too often - see Romeo and Juliet.

Yet it clearly carried on, and had its own very strict rules and code of honour! If you wounded someone in a duel then honour was satisfied, the loser would be patched up and everyone would move on. If you killed your opponent you had to cover it up, and possibly flee the country. I seem to remember there was a duel in Nicholas Nickelby, and that was the 1830s or 40s, and the killers friends had to get him out of the country.

Barnstorming chapter though. I love the last sentence which describes Villefort storming out before he is tempted to finish off what is left of his father.

DuPainDuVinDuFromage · 26/03/2025 10:04

Oh in that case he’s still a criminal then! But an honourable one at least 😂

AgualusasLover · 26/03/2025 09:09

I think duels were illegal even in Louis XIII (that’s BBC Musketeers research, so not robust).

The idea of protecting honour and whatnot goes on for longer I think.

OP posts:
DuPainDuVinDuFromage · 26/03/2025 07:04

I also liked the fact that Noirtier sorted things out without the Count’s involvement. He’s a great character! And seems like a properly good man - the one really dodgy thing we knew about him turns out to have been not dodgy at all by the standards of the time, as killing someone in a duel was perfectly ok, I think?

FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 25/03/2025 22:13

Gosh! I was remembering that a friend of mine went out with this guy who suggested he couldn't live without her if she broke up with him, the creep. It's a kind of consistent male behavioural characteristic! Good on those women from the Middle Ages calling it out!

cassandre · 25/03/2025 22:07

Yes, the 'moi' twist was brilliant, Fuzzy! And you're right about the Count never having met Noirtier; I hadn't thought of that.

cassandre · 25/03/2025 22:05

By the way, on the motif of men supposedly dying for love, Alain Chartier's 15th century poem 'La Belle Dame sans merci" is a fascinating and quite humorous take on that theme. The male lover tells the lady he will die if she doesn't love him, and his death will be all her fault. She tells him in no uncertain terms that if he is silly enough to die for love, the responsibility will be entirely his own. 😂Which just shows that even in the Middle Ages, women conceivably found this kind of emotional blackmail annoying!

FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 25/03/2025 21:59

Exactly @cassandre I had the same thought, that the Count had nothing to do with this episode...as far as we know!
I thought it made a refreshing change in the story for him to be on the side-lines for once. He hasn't ever met Noirtier either, I don't think, in the past or in the present. It was a powerful moment, looking up the dictionary and spelling out 'Moi'.

cassandre · 25/03/2025 21:39

@TonTonMacoute that's an interesting idea about the link to Sorrows of Young Werther! Napoleon loved that novel apparently. And Romanticism and melodrama do have some traits in common.

But I agree with others that 'Marry me or I'll kill myself' is a highly problematic courtship strategy!

@FuzzyCaoraDhubh I also loved the Noirtier chapter. I've become so used to the Count being the puppet master behind events, pulling the strings of the plot (even if it's unclear exactly how and why), but am I right in thinking that for once, the Count doesn't really have anything to do with the way this particular subplot has unfolded? Noirtier, Valentine and Morrel have managed to foil Villefort all on their own, which is interesting.

I think TonTon suggested earlier that Noirtier would have nothing to lose by revealing his involvement in Franz' father's death, and now he's done exactly that. Though now we know it was a duel not a murder, which makes it less criminal apparently 🙄

TimeforaGandT · 25/03/2025 21:26

Having dropped off again as I was so behind I think I am back on track again. Enjoying the Valentine/Morel/Franz shenanigans but not Morel's emotional blackmail with his suicide threat.

Backtracking slightly but is the Count really such a master of disguise that no-one recognises him in his other personas?

Hoping to try and get back into a chapter a day. Let's see if I manage.

TonTonMacoute · 25/03/2025 20:28

MotherOfCatBoy · 25/03/2025 18:53

Agree @cassandre that by the standards of the time that was probably the subtext, and would probably be seen as impossibly romantic. But to us - ugh, stop it already, what is wrong with you?

It would be interesting to know if it's a reference to Goethe's Sorrows or Young Werther, which was hugely popular nearly 100 years previously. The plot was basically young man suffers unrequited love, commits suicide. It was a bit more masculine than just wasting away which is what the girls had to resort to.

A bit later (I've read ahead a bit) he makes a reference to someone being dressed in black like a hero of Goethe, so maybe it was having a bit of a revival when this was written.

FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 25/03/2025 19:18

High drama today with Noirtier pulling the signed documents (some very detailed minutes of that meeting!) out of the secret drawer. Very exciting stuff and I enjoyed the back story. He certainly threw a spanner in the works with regard to the marriage between Valentine and Franz.
I'm surprised Valentine didn't swoon away! I wouldn't have been surprised if Franz had swooned away as well! Poor Franz.

MotherOfCatBoy · 25/03/2025 18:53

Agree @cassandre that by the standards of the time that was probably the subtext, and would probably be seen as impossibly romantic. But to us - ugh, stop it already, what is wrong with you?

DuPainDuVinDuFromage · 23/03/2025 20:51

Yes that definitely makes sense Cassandre, it was the only way for her to get what she wanted without becoming the wrong kind of woman! And the fact that she does love Morrell is at least a mitigating factor in his threat I suppose!

cassandre · 23/03/2025 20:44

I agree that the suicide threat is cringey. However, I suspect that Valentine (because she is portrayed as conforming to the traditional stereotype of the selfless, self-sacrificing woman) can't allow herself to stand up for her own desires in love. Woman pursuing her own sexual desire = a bad thing. So Morrell threatening suicide is a way out for her: a roundabout way for her to realise her own desire. She HAS to marry him, to save his life! It's not for her but for him! It's not selfish, it's an act of mercy! Sigh. But at least the two of them decide to be together.

lifeturnsonadime · 23/03/2025 20:13

FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 23/03/2025 18:47

Completely agree with the above and it also sounds like he is very immature.

I like how Noirtier is back in the frame and is the centre of attention. Wondering how he can help the lovebirds however!

Edited

Isn't it to do with his control over the inheritance?

FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 23/03/2025 18:47

Completely agree with the above and it also sounds like he is very immature.

I like how Noirtier is back in the frame and is the centre of attention. Wondering how he can help the lovebirds however!

lifeturnsonadime · 23/03/2025 18:12

TonTonMacoute · 23/03/2025 17:58

Agree about the suicide threat, especially as he had been so horrified when his own father threatened suicide.

I'm not so sure that it would have been seen as honourable in these circumstances. It tended to be honourable in order to avoid disgrace - like the bankruptcy his father feared. I suppose it might have seemed romantic at the time or writing though.

I'd completely forgotten about Morrell threatening suicide.

Yes it's emotionally manipulative not romantic!

TonTonMacoute · 23/03/2025 17:58

Agree about the suicide threat, especially as he had been so horrified when his own father threatened suicide.

I'm not so sure that it would have been seen as honourable in these circumstances. It tended to be honourable in order to avoid disgrace - like the bankruptcy his father feared. I suppose it might have seemed romantic at the time or writing though.

DuPainDuVinDuFromage · 23/03/2025 17:01

I’m all caught up and enjoying the story! Morrell’s threat of suicide doesn’t sit well with me though - I know it’s of its time and would have been seen as the honourable thing, but it’s so emotionally manipulative! Poor Valentine.

LuckyMauveReader · 23/03/2025 14:29

The chart is a great help @AgualusasLover

This week I read ahead but have missed out on following the conversation on here. Although The few chapters that I am in front pose a couple of interesting questions, I am anxious to hear what everyone else's thoughts are. I now have to wait until Thursday

AgualusasLover · 23/03/2025 12:14

Oh damn, though it took me ages to notice it - yes don’t look everyone and I can repost the list with mme Danglars added.

OP posts:
FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 23/03/2025 07:40

I had forgotten Villefort's name is Gérard!

Impressive chart! Thank you Agua.