Please or to access all these features

What we're reading

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

Did She Fall Or Was She Pushed? Dangerous Liaisons Readalong 2024

537 replies

BishyBarnyBee · 15/04/2024 08:14

Following a series of successful Fallen Women readalongs - War and Peace, Anna Karenina, Madame Bovary, Ruth - we continue our exploration of desire, hypocrisy, disgrace and redemption with the earlier (and even more scandalous) Dangerous Liaisons.

Widely adapted in text, film, opera and even ballet, Les Liaisons Dangereuses is an epistolatory novel comprising 175 letters.

Author Chodelos de Laclos "resolved to write a book that would be quite outside the ordinary trend, which would make a sensation and echo over the world after I left it." His book was a succès de scandale on its 1782 publication, reviewed as "diabolique" while becoming an instant bestseller. Marie Antoinette commissioned a blank cover copy for her library, and Virginia Woolf later read it with "great delight".

Readalongs are Mumsnet's best kept secret - a quiet corner of the site where we tackle the books we might not manage alone, sharing our thoughts and reactions, and encouraging each other to keep going when life - or the book - are challenging. It's fine to dip in and out as life permits, very few of us manage to keep up consistently.

We've only heard good things about DL, so do join us for a cracking good read. We start 1st May, 1 letter a day:

1 - 31 May Letters 1 - 31
1 - 30 June Letters 32 - 61
1 - 31 July Letters 62 - 92
1 - 31 August Letters 93 - 123
1- 30 September 124 - 153
1 - 22nd October 154 - 175

There are summaries of each letter at shmoop.com. I'll post them when I can, but anyone is welcome to start us off if you are first here on the day.

Looking forward to it!


Les Liaisons dangereuses (Dangerous Liaisons) Summary

Free summary and analysis of the events in Pierre Ambroise François Choderlos de Laclos's Les Liaisons dangereus...

Les Liaisons dangereuses (Dangerous Liaisons) Summary

Free summary and analysis of the events in Pierre Ambroise François Choderlos de Laclos's Les Liaisons dangereuses (Dangerous Liaisons) that won't make you snore. We promise.

https://www.shmoop.com/study-guides/dangerous-liaisons/summary.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
41
BishyBarnyBee · 29/10/2024 14:59

And so we have come to the end of Dangerous Liaisons. Thanks to everyone who joined us, and particularly to @Tarahumara and anyone else who took over the Schmoop updates after I went on holiday and literally lost the plot.

I went searching for a suitable image to mark the end of what has been an amazing and thought provoking book, and as always, a wider ranging and well informed discussion. I came across a few items of DL ephemera which I will share here to mark the end of the thread.

If anyone does feel inspired to suggest another readalong in the New Year, it would be great if you could link it to it here so we all get notifications.

OP posts:
ViscountessMelbourne · 24/10/2024 10:26

Looking back, it is an amazingly sophisticated book. The way that we unpick the true motivations behind the words on the paper for a whole host of characters, never seeing the inside of their heads, only ever the faces they present to different audiences. And the pedantic way he enables every single letter to come into the hands of Madame de Rosemonde at the end.

Rereading it's just as much fun as it was in the past, but reading with an older and post #MeToo eye makes me more sensitive to how terrible Cecile's treatment is, and how cruel Merteuil is.

ViscountessMelbourne · 24/10/2024 10:15

CornishLizard · 23/10/2024 20:32

Thanks for posting the summaries Tarahumara! I’ve enjoyed reading along with you all, and got a lot more out of the experience than I would have from reading alone. To be honest I’m not sure I’d have persevered through the grooming of Cécile had I been reading alone, so I surprised myself later by feeling I might encourage my teenage DD to read it.

Just like our previous fallen women reads, things have not ended well for our compromised heroines. Interesting that Valmont and Danceny also got their just desserts.

I went back to the introduction in my copy and it seemed to be arguing that this sort of depravity in aristocratic circles was a factor in the subsequent Revolution. I hadn’t picked up that MdM or VdV had economic power over the other characters?

They don't have economic power over the other characters in the book, (apart from the servants, who they can bribe or blackmail like pawns) because all the protagonists are upper class, but the sexual immorality of the upper classes was a feature in revolutionary pamphlets.

Marie Antoinette in particular was the subject of near-pornographic abuse for her rumoured (almost certainly completely fictitious) sexual shenanigans.

She was allegedly having affairs with male relatives, sleeping with her female friends, and manipulating Louis.

FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 24/10/2024 09:07

Tarahumara · 24/10/2024 08:53

Danceny is still an annoying twat 😂 this is another excellent point!

😅

Tarahumara · 24/10/2024 08:53

Danceny is still an annoying twat 😂 this is another excellent point!

Tarahumara · 24/10/2024 08:52

I agree that one of the most surprising things to me about reading this book is all the naughty things that people got up to for a book written so long ago. Maybe you're right Bishy that this was part of its appeal!

FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 24/10/2024 08:45

Interesting points, Bishy, especially your comments about the poor ordinary folk living a hand to mouth existence when others lived a decadent life. Very early on in the book Valmont made a big gesture to a woman when he gave her a few coins the time when he was trying to impress Tourvel. Crumbs from his table!

I think those two letters are weak. I'm glad they were dropped. Interesting interpretation! I would probably have leant towards melodrama but who knows! I missed the miscarriage reference at the time. It was a veiled reference in the French text.

I think we did well to keep the thread going with small number of readers. We might look into starting up again in the new year.

BishyBarnyBee · 24/10/2024 08:32

ViscountessMelbourne · 23/10/2024 22:25

My version has a couple of deleted letters at the end.
Has this book totally corrupted my imagination or is the second letter talking about masturbation?

Do you mean the first deleted letter? Tourvel to Valmont? Yes, I think you might be right though I had just read it as overblown melodrama. That would explain why the publisher had replaced it with a footnote too.

You wouldn't suspect it, had the book not been so very detailed and shocking in its pretty explicit account of sexual activity that we might not expect in literature until perhaps the 1960s.

It makes me question my assessment of the book again - maybe it is a warning to young women to beware the charming snake, but it is surely also the closest many readers would get to erotica? The pious author with his awful warnings is definitely having his cake and eating it here!

OP posts:
BishyBarnyBee · 24/10/2024 08:23

Yes, huge thanks to @Tarahumara and everyone else who has posted summaries. I really lost the plot after our extended summer break and drifted into letting others do the heavy lifting on the thread, so massive thanks to everyone who picked it up and kept us going. I probably wouldn't lead a read along again, though I hope someone else does, I think they are one of the very best things mumsnet has to offer.

I think the killer for me was the fallow period where the book was a bit boring and engagement fell off. I had a few weeks of feeling like I was talking to myself and got a bit disheartened. This happened with Ruth as well but I was committed to writing the summaries and I stuck with it. I think the existence of Schmoop let me take a back seat this time. I'm so glad the thread survived and that we managed to finish the book.

OP posts:
BishyBarnyBee · 24/10/2024 08:12

CornishLizard · 23/10/2024 20:32

Thanks for posting the summaries Tarahumara! I’ve enjoyed reading along with you all, and got a lot more out of the experience than I would have from reading alone. To be honest I’m not sure I’d have persevered through the grooming of Cécile had I been reading alone, so I surprised myself later by feeling I might encourage my teenage DD to read it.

Just like our previous fallen women reads, things have not ended well for our compromised heroines. Interesting that Valmont and Danceny also got their just desserts.

I went back to the introduction in my copy and it seemed to be arguing that this sort of depravity in aristocratic circles was a factor in the subsequent Revolution. I hadn’t picked up that MdM or VdV had economic power over the other characters?

It might not have been about individual economic power. Could be more that the common folk lived lives of unrelenting poverty but their labour enabled the aristocracy to swan around living lives of utter decadence.

OP posts:
ViscountessMelbourne · 23/10/2024 22:25

My version has a couple of deleted letters at the end.
Has this book totally corrupted my imagination or is the second letter talking about masturbation?

Did She Fall Or Was She Pushed? Dangerous Liaisons Readalong 2024
Did She Fall Or Was She Pushed? Dangerous Liaisons Readalong 2024
Did She Fall Or Was She Pushed? Dangerous Liaisons Readalong 2024
FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 23/10/2024 21:34

Yes! That's irritating!
And Danceny is still an annoying twat.
He conveniently forgot about his liaison with Merteuil when he became sanctimonious at the end.

Tarahumara · 23/10/2024 21:20

The character I'm cross about is Prevan. Valmont and Danceny got their just desserts but he ended up being treated as a hero! Irritating.

FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 23/10/2024 21:15

I'm going to the read the intro next as well. I'm still not sure what Merteuil's trial was about.

CornishLizard · 23/10/2024 20:32

Thanks for posting the summaries Tarahumara! I’ve enjoyed reading along with you all, and got a lot more out of the experience than I would have from reading alone. To be honest I’m not sure I’d have persevered through the grooming of Cécile had I been reading alone, so I surprised myself later by feeling I might encourage my teenage DD to read it.

Just like our previous fallen women reads, things have not ended well for our compromised heroines. Interesting that Valmont and Danceny also got their just desserts.

I went back to the introduction in my copy and it seemed to be arguing that this sort of depravity in aristocratic circles was a factor in the subsequent Revolution. I hadn’t picked up that MdM or VdV had economic power over the other characters?

FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 23/10/2024 20:03

Thanks for posting summaries on the thread Tarahumara! It kept us going.

Yes. It does sound like it. That's an interesting parallel with Cécile. Everyone has lost something or has been permanently affected by the end. Merteuil got a terribly hard punishment! Disfigured and living her life as an outcast. A kind of living death, really. Valmont's exit was quick and neat by comparison.

Tarahumara · 23/10/2024 19:26

And that's all folks! So it sounds like Danceny becomes a monk as well as Cecile becoming a nun?

Tarahumara · 23/10/2024 19:26

Letter 174: The Chevalier Danceny to Madame de Rosemonde

  • Danceny accepts the terms that a Madame de Rosemonde set down regarding the letters.
  • He's furious with the Marquise for corrupting Cécile.
  • He doesn't love Cécile any more, but he can't hate her. Any innocent young girl could be as easily led astray by the likes of the Marquise and Valmont.
  • He asks Madame de Rosemonde if she thinks he's done everything he should regarding this situation.
  • When she's assured him of it, he plans to travel to Malta and take vows that will shut him off from the world. He just wants to forget everything.
Letter 175: Madame de Volanges to Madame de Rosemonde
  • Madame de Volanges thinks she was right to believe that the Marquise de Merteuil would have been better off dying from smallpox.
  • She recovered, but she's been left horribly disfigured. She even lost an eye to the disease and apparently looks pretty hideous.
  • Someone mentions that her soul is now visible on her face.
  • She also loses the lawsuit brought against her, and she's now heavily in debt.
  • She flees to Holland, taking her diamonds, jewels, and whatever else she can get her hands on so her creditors can't get anything.
  • All her servants refuse to go with her.
  • Her relatives are left to try to pay off her debts.
  • Madame de Volanges, as a distant relative, plans to help with that, but first she has to go to the convent to watch her daughter take her vows.
  • She knows that Danceny has left for Malta and wishes there were still time to bring him back.
  • She wishes she knew the extent of her daughter's guilt; it's hard for a mother to imagine her daughter involved in such terrible things.
  • But she knows that thinking about couldn't have prevented it, and it sure won't be of any help in getting over it.
  • "Publisher's" note: This is all there is. He's not prepared, for reasons of his own, to tell what eventually happened to Cécile and Madame de Merteuil. Inquiring minds might want to know, but they'll have to wait.
Tarahumara · 20/10/2024 17:39

I think Madame Rosamonde is trying to protect Madame de Volanges. I agree it's not completely clear though.

I have really enjoyed this book. Such intrigue!

Tarahumara · 20/10/2024 17:35

Letter 170: Madame de Volanges to Madame de Rosemonde

  • Madame de Volanges discovers that her daughter Cécile has left home.
  • Two hours later she receives a letter from Cécile saying she's decided to become a nun and asking her mother not to ask her why.
  • At the convent, mother and daughter meet, but Cécile won't tell her what's happened.
  • Volanges asks Madame de Rosemonde for advice about whether she should make Cécile marry Gercourt, who's due back in town very soon.
Letter 171: Madame de Rosemonde to the Chevalier Danceny
  • Madame de Rosemonde will refrain from lodging a complaint against Danceny, but she asks that she be allowed to keep the letters in her possession unless he needs them for some legal defense.
  • She won't disclose their contents to anyone.
  • She also asks that he give her all Cécile's letters; she doesn't want to cause any more pain to Madame de Volanges.
Letter 172: Madame de Rosemonde to Madame de Volanges
  • Madame de Rosemonde tells her friend that the rumors about the Marquise don't come close to the full truth. The truth is "a pack of horrors." Trust her.
  • She advises not to reject her daughter's vocation and not to inquire into the reasons for her advice.
Letter 173: Madame de Volanges to Madame de Rosemonde
  • Not content to be kept in the dark, Madame de Volanges tries to piece the puzzle together and asks confirmation from Madame de Rosemonde.
  • What she's imagining is so bad that the truth can't be any worse.
  • She tells Madame de Rosemonde what she already knows, that Cécile was hot for Danceny.
  • She's afraid that the two of them might have sneaked some time together when she wasn't around to stop them.
  • She's afraid her daughter's made a huge mistake by taking vows at the convent, and her only hope is that Danceny might do right by her and marry her.
FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 20/10/2024 17:09

I can't remember what letter we're on anymore. I found Mme de Volanges's denial of rumours quite comical and it reminds me a lot of how my mother behaves when she has decided what is true despite evidence to the contrary. It made me smile and grit my teeth.

'I have, happily, the strongest reasons to believe that these imputations are as false as they are odious(...) I have every cause to believe (...) It seems to me clearly proved...'

I have come round to thinking that Rosamonde is trying to shield Mme Volanges from the truth. I think this is her main concern.

Well my dear and revered friends, we are almost at the end of the book! It has been a really absorbing read.

FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 20/10/2024 14:13

I think that Rosamonde ends up with most of the letters in her possession so she really becomes a kind of depository.

Yes. I know. I'm going to think about it some more, the Rosamonde angle.

CornishLizard · 20/10/2024 12:34

I thought it was to get revenge on Merteuil too Fuzzy.

I think if I was reading again I’d pay more attention to Rosamonde and Volanges as I was much more taken with the other characters. Rosamonde‘a main loyalty is to Valmont’s memory but I can’t tell how much she’s holding back from Mme Volanges out of piety and how much she is enjoying being repository of knowledge.

FuzzyCaoraDhubh · 20/10/2024 09:21

I'm not completely sure. First I thought that Madame Rosamonde was trying to protect her friend because the truth was too terrible to know. Or could it be that she is shielding Valmont and her family's good name?

I'm not certain about that either. Valmont may have had a reconciliation with Danceny, but did he release the letters to implicate Merteuil, because I was leaning towards that as the reason.

CornishLizard · 20/10/2024 08:54

Enjoying reading the insightful discussion. I’ve found this quite a difficult book to keep pace with - the letters are so short and some sections so propulsive that I’ve often been ahead when I haven’t been behind. After reading your comments above I think I need a reread but I don’t think I could face the early parts again.

Poor Cécile. Sorely needed education and options in life. Will Rosamonde ever tell Mme Volanges in person what happened, not wishing to put it in writing, does she genuinely think it must not be divulged, or is she enjoying keeping her in the dark?

On Valmont/Danceny - I cynically read it as Valmont seizing the opportunity to get the letters out as evidence as much as a heartfelt reconciliation.

Swipe left for the next trending thread