Please or to access all these features

What we're reading

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

What is everyone reading?

185 replies

MrsSpoon · 11/08/2007 18:26

Just nosey and looking for recommendations or titles to avoid.

I am currently reading the new Kate Atkinson, the name of which escapes me. It is fantastic thought nothing could live up to Case Histories but this is just as good.

OP posts:
TwoIfBySea · 25/08/2007 22:38

Just finished a really entertaining book called Beyond The Great Indoors by Ingvar Ambjornsen. Unusual in that you don't get many books set in Oslo about mental patients adjusting to life in the city. Unusual in that you wouldn't think it any good but it is, very well written and great characters.

Am currently reading Extreme Motherhood by Jackie Clune, which is making me glad I had only twins to deal with and not triplets (plus toddler.)

BandofMothers · 25/08/2007 12:06

I am reading Magician, byRaymond E Feist, as recommended by another thread like this one.
Very good so far.

Bink · 25/08/2007 12:00

My other favourite discovery was of a woman who ran the "testimonial" department of one of these iconic agencies, whose name for those purposes was something invented and anodyne. "What her real name is is nobody's business," said the book.

I loved the idea of having a nom de guerre for professional work (as opposed to writing/media/stage etc. etc., which are I think the only places you see it now?).
But my MIL (who has impeccable feminist credentials) said that that me using my maiden name for work was not so far away from that. What do you think?

Bink · 25/08/2007 11:53

Andrew Marr sounds good.

Intelligent contextualising demystifying reportage is an under-appreciated sort of writing. On holiday I picked up something called "Madison Avenue USA" which was an early-sixties Penguin reprint of a very thoughtfully written assessment of the US advertising trade as it stood in the late fifties. Written in that satisfying Penguin/Pelican accessible-academic style (by which I mean making the best of both sorts of writing) - plus a particular hobbyhorse enthusiasm of mine, which is cosmopolitan-American writing - sounds contradiction in terms, but it's absolutely not (though very Ivy League) - can go on about this at length should anyone wish.

Anyway - particularly fascinating in tandem with Then We Came to the End, and full of surprising discoveries - did you know that "Unique Selling Point" or USP as beloved of Sunday supplement acronym-inventors dates back to the 30s, and to one specific adman's obsession with psychology?

fortyplus · 25/08/2007 01:34

Two that I've read recently that I'd recommend giving a miss...

Short History of Tractors in Ukrainian (supposed to be hysterically funny but just pathetic imo)

The Book Of Lost Things (most irritatingly pretentious author since Tolkein! )

DrippingLizzie · 25/08/2007 01:28

Andrew Marr's My Trade. Fascinating insight into world of journalism.

And latest volume of CBeebies Magazine with great Charlie and Lola bedtime story

RosaLuxembourg · 25/08/2007 01:26

Just finished As Music and Splendour by Kate O'Brien which I last read when I was 20. Loved it even more this time but had to explain to DH that he would not like to read it because it makes Jane Austen look like Dan Brown (ie there is NO PLOT whatsoever).
On holiday I also read William Trevor's new collection of short stories which is ace, and Kate Mosse's Labyrinth which was utter, utter tripe.
And Dusty Answer, which I also hadn't read since my teens and is also still wonderful. And nothing happens in that either.

chocolateshoes · 24/08/2007 21:10

Have just started the Memory Keepers Daughter which I'm really enjoying. Befire that it was 'Saturday' by Iam Mcewan and 'We need to talk about Kevin' by Lional Shriver. All quite different and all v good. Am worried becasue I don't know what I'm going to read next. Haven't got anything lined up.

roisin · 24/08/2007 20:59

Blu - LOL that we are the centre of the world

Bink · 24/08/2007 17:26

Marina - are you going to let ds go on beyond book 5? (dino, did you let ds1 go further?) I am trying to persuade ds that books 6 & 7 should be saved till he's a bit older.

I have the not-at-all-derivative-or-formulaic, oh no, first Deltora suite for him next.

(And I don't do Prof McGonagall because re me it's just a weeny weeny bit coals to Newcastle )

Carnoodleusfudge · 24/08/2007 15:59

I'm reading Half a Yellow Sun.

Much better than I expected.

zippitippitoes · 24/08/2007 15:55

by a pure coincidence i just clicked on this thread having started reading atonement this afternoon...

in order to get me reading as i have had concentration problems i read what i thought would be a light but ok read first fifty is not a four letter word by linda kelsey what a load of tripe..it did not make me laugh or weep page after apge i just thought what a cynical tossed off write by numbers and cliches effort

Blu · 24/08/2007 15:37

LOL - Mn is the centre of the wold!

I googled the newspaper review I mentioned below but instead of finding it within the newspapers website, up came Roisin's MN post of the reviewers individual contribution to the Amazon Reviews! So..Roisin posted this in March:

"Reviewer: Dr RAA Eaglestone - See all my reviews
This is a dreadful and misleading book.

First, there a huge number of terrible historical inaccuracies: the book is not so much ?under-researched? as 'not researched at all'. Some of these inaccuracies are minor and excusable. Some are middling (the author has no idea that Auschwitz was in fact a complex of camps, and that the gas chambers were at a different location from the ones he thinks they were, nor about the processes of selection for death; the fences of the camps were both electrified and guarded). Some are major: while thirteen year old boys (like the survivor Elie Wiesel) got away with pretending to be sixteen, younger children ? like the nine year old involved - were gassed on arrival at Auschwitz-Birkenau. These stretch even the demands of fiction or even the excuse that ?it?s all from a little boys point of view? ? I mean, an electrified fence is an electrified fence. If the author had even bothered to read even two books on the subject ? Robert Jan Van Pelt?s Auschwitz, Raul Hilberg?s Perpetrators Victims and Bystanders, both easily available -- these stupid mistakes would have been avoided. Instead, the story occurs in a sort of ?mythical Holocaust land? (just as if one might set a story in a ?mythical world war II ?land? which claimed to be historical in which Winston Churchill and John Wayne saved Private Ryan while blowing up the Guns of Navarone). And subtitling it ?a fable? doesn?t help or excuse this.

But worse than all this is the misleading faux innocence of the main character, Bruno. He is nine years old in Hitler?s Germany: his father is a high ranking Nazi officer. A real Bruno would be in the Hitler Youth, playing soldiers, bombarded with propaganda and at home playing board games in which the aim was to round up Jews (you can go and see one of these games at the Wiener Library in London): he would have been totally inundated with the evil racist propaganda of the regime, and not at all the naïve innocent he is in this book, with whom we can identify. The Bruno in the book doesn?t even know there is a war going on (can you imagine a book set in 1942 in London, where a nine year old doesn?t know about the war?).

Of course there need to be books for children about the Holocaust, and of course these will ?water down? the events. OK. But this misses the whole point ? that the Nazis turned people in non-humans and did their best to recruit everyone into plans with their propaganda, even ? especially ? nine year old boys. This book is an unresearched cash-in of the worst sort: the author, his agent Simon Trewin (who has given the book a five star review on Amazon, but at least identified himself), and his publisher should be ashamed of themselves, and I advise that the book be withdrawn from publication. "

there is a further MN connection in all this - but i'm not going to tell you what it is!

Spockle · 24/08/2007 14:39

Atonement is fab, I may just read that again instead.....

McDreamy · 24/08/2007 14:39

Yorkshire have not long read that - it was the only book ever to make me cry! Good book though, don't be put off by my blubbing.

I am about to start the memory keepers daughter.

yorkshirepudding · 24/08/2007 14:35

Message withdrawn

yorkshirepudding · 24/08/2007 14:35

Message withdrawn

Blu · 24/08/2007 14:34

Sprockle - the DH of a friend wrote a review of the Boy In Striped Pyjamas in a particular newspaper and damn, damn, damned it for being badly researched, over-sensational and pretty offensive in it's 'schmaltz amongst the horror' about the Holocaust. The review was far more learned and analytical than that, obviously. But I have't read the book.

MrsPuddleduck · 24/08/2007 14:32

Atonement by Ian McEwan - its just been made into a blockbuster film so I had to read the book first (cant' do it the other way around).

The first couple of chapters were a bit heavy going but after that it was fantastic.

Blu · 24/08/2007 14:31

Have read in quick succession my holiday 'light reading' selection:
Digging To America - Interesting, enjoyable, small canvass work about two families adopting.
Salmon Fishing In The Yemen (rough title, can't remember) fairly blunt satire, sporadically very funny, ok
One Good Turn - I love Kate Atkinson - didn't think this was as complex or interesting as Case Histories, but still enjoyed it - she writies so well
A Spot of Bother - not quite finished - lighter / less skilled than Curious incident - but I love his characterisation and detail - and it is very funny in places.

Spockle · 24/08/2007 14:25

"The boy in the striped pyjamas" is looking at me, can anyone advise? It's either that or "If no-one speaks of remarkable things" which I have given up twice so far.

Spockle · 24/08/2007 14:24

Just finished Kathy Lette's "How to kill your husband and other household hints" Don't do it, it's shiiiiiiiiite. The odd witty aside, but that's not enough to justify it.

morgansauntie · 24/08/2007 14:23

policywonk thank you I'll make a note of that, at the moment I'm in the process of filling out an application form to see if I qualify for financial support from the Open University - having printed it out it seems to be a book so I guess this afternoon I'm reading 'Application for financial support'

Crime used to be my favourite genre but in the last few years I have broadened my reading and now really enjoy a variety of authors.

I recently read Lord of the Flies again and really enjoyed it

yorkshirepudding · 24/08/2007 14:22

Message withdrawn

TheMaskedPoster · 24/08/2007 14:22

the Hogfather