Please or to access all these features

What we're reading

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

How many of these have you read?

117 replies

Jessicatmagnificat · 08/06/2007 09:45

johnandsheena.co.uk/books/1001books_arukiyomi.xls

Just came across this. It is fun, but quite scary. Am too embarrassed to reveal my own score here! Don't know if the link will work, and would be grateful if someone more knowledgeable than me could amend it. Thanks

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Bouquetsofdynomite · 14/06/2007 21:29

LOL I'm dead chuffed because I've read 27 of them! Including 3 18th century ones (ok 2 were pretty much porn.)

AuldAlliance · 14/06/2007 13:39

235 (guess what I do for a living...?)

BUT am relieved not to have to confess to how many
a) I enjoyed
b) I can remember much about

Agree the list is odd, strange choices for certain authors. Not much Scottish stuff, either, bar the Grassic Gibbon and some Stevenson.

alipiggie · 14/06/2007 04:50

196 but as an English Grad - I'd actually had to read a lot of them anyway. Some were also in the original language. Interesting to jog my memory as to how many I'd read.

littlelapin · 14/06/2007 01:01

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

fortyplus · 14/06/2007 00:00

Well I've only read 55 - most of them before I was 20! A bit shocked that I had read so few of the 20th century ones.

However - why no Homer - The Iliad/The Odyssey

No other Greek Lit - Herodotus/Medea/Sophocles/Electra.

Whoever compiled the list was a pleb!

controlfreaky2 · 13/06/2007 23:57

dont any of you read much? . 335 here (some of them really crap!)funny list.

merlotmama · 13/06/2007 23:47

124 and I had thought I was well read. Appalled to discover a) how many books I know I have read, but have forgotten all about and b) how many I started and gave up on.

Going thro' phases of reading all Steinbecks/Dickens/Wyndhams or whoever, helped. Some very bizarre choices tho'...what is it with all those Ian Banks (in both his incarnations?)

AnneJones · 13/06/2007 12:14

120 - much lower than expected so am very glad you all think it a bizarre list - I certainly felt it was, thought I was reasonably well-read. I didn't score things I am pretty sure I have read but couldn't remember much about though! Modern list was quite odd. Lots of good things missed off totally. Grr.

StripeyKnickersSpottySocks · 12/06/2007 22:09

Well I spent 2 hours ploughing through Amaon this morning looking up lots of the books I've not heard of. Then discounting the oes that don't appeal and making a list of those I want to read - have about 200 in my "must read" list!

zizou · 12/06/2007 10:20

101 including all those Beckett novels I read for my degree but cannot remember now. And am writer. .

themildmanneredjanitor · 12/06/2007 10:14

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Anna8888 · 12/06/2007 10:06

I was a bit surprised, as I don't think of myself as a great reader of fiction. I prefer real life.

StripeyKnickersSpottySocks · 12/06/2007 10:04

I really liked the Alchemist and I love books.

Only read 65 on there though. Must read more.

NoodleStroodle · 12/06/2007 09:09

Almost want to read the Alchemist now to find out why it's so awful!

Botbot · 12/06/2007 09:04

Paolo Cuehlo books are just rubbish - they're books for people who don't like books, in my opinion. Read The Alchemist for a book group once and didn't even turn up to the group because I couldn't bear the idea of talking about it. I almost put it in the recycling rather than the charity shop bag because I didn't want anyone else to have to read it!

Nightynight · 11/06/2007 22:09

a lot of those books I chose not to read, because they didnt appeal. eg the Paulo Coehlos - they just make me want the sick bucket.
so I dont believe the list.

margoandjerry · 11/06/2007 21:25

112 - but what a weird list. 1000 books and almost the only "children's" book on it is Le Petit Prince? Weird. Hated that book anyway.

policywonk · 11/06/2007 21:12
Shock
Botbot · 11/06/2007 21:10

Certainly is. I remember when I first started (mid-90s) there was a directive that came from one of our big US clients (very famous publisher which I'm obviously not going to name) that we were not allowed to show black people in our books, as they 'wouldn't appeal to their core readership'. Found it a bit scary! Presume it's changed now though.

Oops, this is turning into a hijack...

policywonk · 11/06/2007 21:07

Hey, Botbot, I used to be an editor at a packaging publisher as well. It's an eye-opener, isn't it?

Botbot · 11/06/2007 21:00

I think I know why the list seems so bizarre.

I presume it originally came from this book. I'm an editor and used to work for the company that made the book. Its main area of publishing is 'co-editions' - basically, you think of a book idea then sell it to lots of other publishing companies around the world before you actually make the book, and these other companies will sell it under their own name. It's a good, very low-risk way of making money in publishing because all your costs are underwritten before you even start.

The drawback is that, because you want the book to sell all over the world, you have to make it appeal to the whole world. The biggest market is the USA, so these books really have to be skewed to an American audience. It will then be sold in translation all over Europe, so you have to have lots of European content too. The risk is that in trying to be so all-inclusive, you lose the book's integrity
and it starts to look strange to the UK audience.

I think that's what's happened with this book. The list is very US-centric but also carefully includes lots of obscure-sounding European authors. In trying to be all things to all people, they've ended up with a a list that looks a bit odd to us Brits.

Having said that, there are lots of things on here that I've not heard of and I quite fancy trying!

(my score was 204, by the way - I'm quietly impressed with myself!)

Steward · 11/06/2007 19:03

8 becuase the books I do read are not there. Theres was one book ididn' t because I strarted reading it but never finished.

Cappuccino · 11/06/2007 16:49

109

no poetry

no short stories

no independent stuff

bor-ing

msappropriate · 11/06/2007 16:27
  1. Some ropey modern stuff on the list though
policywonk · 11/06/2007 16:09

Has anyone read Cees Nooteboom? Worth it?

Swipe left for the next trending thread