Please or to access all these features

What we're reading

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

Books you are ashamed never to have read?

139 replies

Piggywaspushed · 02/01/2018 10:32

I have an English degree and have taught English Lit A level for many years. I was a bookworm as a child and have a huge stockpile of books read and awaiting reading.

Partly , this thread arises form the fact that I have been dissatisfied with so many contemporary novels recently but partly, I am also a bit ashamed that there are books I feel I should have read!

I decided a few years ago to make my way through some of this shameful list but have only managed Pride and Prejudice (knew I wouldn't like it) and Great Expectations (read it for my son's GCSE which is more than he did...it's very long, isn't it?). I read The Handmaid's Tale out of obligation and shame last year. Underwhelmed.

Frankenstein and The Grapes of Wrath are on my bedside table (have been for about a year) and Middlemarch is on my Kindle. I will read Frankenstein before DS2's GCSE. I have never read Dracula either.

I went to school in Scotland so was reading a lot of Scottish classics in my defence and have read nearly every Hardy novel.

Anyone else like to admit what you haven't read bur should have??

Feel free to boast about what you have read too! (although not Ulysses or War and Peace because we all know that would be showing off and/or a lie!)

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
HappydaysArehere · 18/02/2018 11:18

Piggywaspushed. It was an Everyman edition. I still have it. I remember the introduction which said that the reader would find it like climbing a hill at first but once upon the top he would view a wonderful panarama. This allowed me to expect a slow start but even at that young age I was absorbed straight away. Tolstoy has a habit of stopping from time to time to inform the reader about his views on war and how it comes about. The battle scenes are really interesting as Tolstoy is depicting real and correct happenings. The love and romance is lovely. Natasha Rostov is a delight. The thing to remember when reading Tolstoy is that his main characters are depicting himself. Hence his guilt about his rakish behaviour in his early years and his struggle with this. Golly, hope I haven’t put you off!

Piggywaspushed · 17/02/2018 10:30

happydays, I may give War and Peace a go at some point in my life since many people seem to love it. I didn't know you could buy it in volumes; that's appealing to me.

scribbly and I are both going to dot he readalong Bleak House so that'll tick off another classic.

I have now also just done Northanger Abbey . WW2 broke out on the 50 books thread because I was just a bit ambivalent about it! Whoops.

The ferocity of Austen fans is quite something!

I am laying off the classics for the meantime , at least until Frankenstein comes up in my random book selector and also Grapes of Wrath which I definitely count as a classic. I studied American Lit at uni , inspired by my American mother's love of encouraging my reading. But I hated most nineteenth century stuff, sadly : Sister Carrie aside, which I loved and may well reread one day. (That may well squeal into the 20th come to think of it).

OP posts:
HappydaysArehere · 17/02/2018 09:54

I asked my English teacher which book did she consider to be the greatest novel ever written. I was thirteen at the time. She considered and selected War and a Peace. Asked for it as a Christmas present. It came in three volumes which is definitely the way to read it as there are only about 250 odd pages in each volume. (Everyman edition). I started it on Christmas Day evening and had finished it by the end of the holidays. I fell in love with Peter Basoukov. I Loved it. A couple of years ago I reread it as as a 74 year old and I still loved it. Cannot understand what all this talk of it being difficult or too long is about. There are a lot of books just as long and not nearly as informative or interesting. And I am definitely not lying.

PseudoFred · 14/02/2018 22:26

I read lots of classics as a teenager; all of Jane Austin's books, Wuthering Heights, Jane Eyre etc and most of Thomas Hardy's (v. Painful!). Jude the Obscure has forever retained its #1 slot on my list of worst/depressing books ever.

I tried to read Middlemarch but it was so dull. I forced myself to read a page a day but gave up before long. Never fancied Dickens. Also tried and failed to get into Vanity Fair.

Piggywaspushed · 10/02/2018 20:58

Good idea!

OP posts:
ScribblyGum · 10/02/2018 20:46

Have to pretend you a Victorian lady spending a shilling on each monthly instalment. I may buy a bonnet and wear it while reading my few chapters a month.

Piggywaspushed · 10/02/2018 19:54

Interesting idea, that scribbly. Not sure I can read that slowly, though!

OP posts:
ScribblyGum · 10/02/2018 19:38

I’ve ever read any Dickens but am going to join the goodreads readalong of Bleak House starting in March... and finishing in Sept 2019. Reading it in the same time frame as it was published originally. I reckon that’s pretty doable.

Piggywaspushed · 10/02/2018 19:22

Just polished off Tale of Two Cities, so I am doing well in my penitence. Enjoyed it much more than I expected to.

OP posts:
strawberriesaregood · 10/02/2018 12:27

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Piggywaspushed · 09/02/2018 18:10

Ha! Grin

OP posts:
sinceyouask · 09/02/2018 17:22

None! I read what I fancy reading and don't feel under any obligation to read anything. Especially not since I read Brave New World, detested it, read it again to try and get from it what everyone else raved about, continued to detest it and was told by someone else that I must not have understood it. No, you fool, I just thought it was rubbish, that's allowed.

Piggywaspushed · 09/02/2018 15:59

Ugh! I probably hate On The Road more than any book ever written*. I can't even articulate why. It's like a visceral response of hatred.

  • possibly not more than DH Lawrence or Moby Dick
OP posts:
DelurkingAJ · 09/02/2018 13:39

I’m ashamed about my lack of 20th century classics like ‘On the Road’ etc. Although as my English education stopped at GCSE I don’t feel too bad.

Lord of the Rings I have never got through (‘they met some orcs, they fought some orcs, they sang a song about beating the orcs’). But I think that trying the book is probably more important than finishing it, no? I’m never going to be able to read everything so picking and choosing based on good information is the way to go!

fromwesttoeast · 07/02/2018 22:01

Tale of Two Cities is my favourite Dickens. I also really like the Shakespeare history plays. I did Richard III with a GCSE class in the days when we had controlled assessment - he is such an outrageous villain - really engaging.

Piggywaspushed · 07/02/2018 07:05

Bleak House was mazing when it was on TV : Charles Dance was incredible. Didn't make me want to read it though!

One thing about Dickens is , from a teacher's point of view, he is really hard to read aloud : sentences that twist and twine for about 18 lines! Oliver Twist is fine if it's bits with Fagin or Sikes or the bits near the end.

OP posts:
SquirrelWatcher · 06/02/2018 23:14

I love the bit in David Copperfield possibly not David Copperfield, but I'm pretty sure it is where David gets drunk for the first time and it captures the feeling of being young and drunk so well. Also the family who paint Happy Cottage on their interior wall and get the proportions slightly wrong, just because I wouldn't have imagined Georgians/early Victorians doing that, but someone obviously did and Dickens wrote about it. Orlanda I really like the imagery in Our Mutual Friend too - all that dust - but I'm struggling to remember the plot!

BonnieF · 06/02/2018 22:52

I have tried reading Tolkien several times, but gave up after a few dozen pages. It’s just tripe.

Ulysses - pretentious tripe.

I enjoy most of Shakespeare’s tragedies and comedies but can’t get on with the histories. Henry IV part 7, or whatever? Historic tripe.

OrlandaFuriosa · 06/02/2018 22:35

Completely agree with squirrel. Other than a few purple passages, the fog in bleak house, the fog and pip’s fear in GE, read quickly. He’d have been writing for TV these days, that soap about schools, can’t recall its name. Or west wing. Or something about the nhs. Bleak house, which I adore, works as a biting indictment of how we treated and indeed continue to treat “ the poor” as well as the legal service, and do goodery...added to which there’s a murder interest...yum. And some very strange and nasty people ..extra yum. . I think Our Mutual Friend works brillíantly like that, the two intertwined plots, the symbolism of the dust heaps looming over you. It would make a great serial.

Piggywaspushed · 06/02/2018 21:29

I'm doing Tale of Two Cities at the moment...60 pages in. By Dickens' standards it's quite short!

OP posts:
SquirrelWatcher · 06/02/2018 21:24

I've enjoyed Dickens much more since approaching them like watching a soap, and not trying too hard to follow plot, etc. The characters are great, and stay with me, the plots....get a bit hazy, tbh

fromwesttoeast · 05/02/2018 21:29

I’m just coming to the end of The Moonstone and I’ve really enjoyed it!
Another I have started but not yet had time to finish is My Antonia. What I’ve read of it so far has been interesting.
One I loved reading years ago was Lark Rise to Candleford. That’s not really fiction though!

FairNotFair · 01/02/2018 08:47

I love Wilkie Collins and have read quite a lot of his more obscure stuff... but have never managed to get through The Moonstone.

Piggywaspushed · 01/02/2018 08:11

I read Great Expectations for the same reason! He should have just cut out everything except Miss Havisham!

I think Dickens continues to be studied and praised because of his clear social campaigning (you and I both know the obsession with ;context'!) . But, yes, he does bang on and on and on. So does George Eliot. It's the serialisation issues, I suppose.

Whereas - the odd chapter about stone masonry aside- I would have said Hardy is more direct and pithy.

I hate Gothic literature. Sorry.

OP posts:
TheOnlyLivingBoyInNewCross · 01/02/2018 07:27

English teacher here too, with a predilection for crime fiction when off-duty.

Have finally read Great Expectations as my son is studying it for GCSE, but Dickens makes me irrationally cross because he is so universally praised and I find him long-winded and not as clever as he thinks he is.

George Eliot is another big gap in my knowledge: studied Silas Marner for A Level and that was the beginning and end of my time with her.

Love Shakespearean tragedies, love Gothic and dystopian generally, love a lot of new literature.

I am put off by anything that seems to worthy or try-hard, or that seems to be self-consciously desperate to be different. Hence never having mde it through Ulysses because it’s all a bit Emperor’s new clothes for me.

However, I did read War and Peace as a pretentious teen Grin