Please or to access all these features

What we're reading

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

Who thinks Tess of the D'Urbervilles was raped?

72 replies

KindDogsTail · 08/05/2016 12:19

Who thinks Tess of the D'Urbervilles was raped?( In the book by Thomas Hardy 1892)

I started a thread in Feminism about this but I wondered if perhaps some book lovers might not have looked in Feminism recently. This book is so loved and so important.

I also posted in Radio but no one has answered.

Academics discussing this book in the programme In Our Time last Thursday
said, 'We can't know.'

I feel that one can indeed know.... yes, she was.
So do most people as far as I can see.

www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006qykl/episodes/player
about 32:00 minutes in.

OP posts:
MarianneSolong · 09/05/2016 11:20

Well, maybe all we can be sure of is that TV and radio don't 'do' literature very well. Radio can be better as there aren't so many distracting visuals. But too often Radio 4 is just the same old smug voices of people who think they're clever because - well because they keep getting asked back to do stuff on Radio 4.

KindDogsTail · 09/05/2016 11:01

OurBlanche
Was it rape? is not, in my opinion, the right question to ask of that text

It was however the question being asked in this case and in the part of the radio programme being alluded to..

Of course the book raises vast and complex issues in which rape is one just apart. That is not in dispute.

OP posts:
KindDogsTail · 09/05/2016 10:57

Our Blanche
would agree with Muskey and Marianne. The point is that Tess was suborned, taken advantage of... actions not of her choosing may not mean rape, it may mean grooming,

In modern times if a person has sex with another when they are asleep, that is rape.

Tess!" said d'Urberville.
There was no answer. The obscurity was now so great that he could see absolutely nothing but a pale nebulousness at his feet, which represented the white muslin figure he had left upon the dead leaves. Everything else was blackness alike. D'Urberville stooped; and heard a gentle regular breathing. He knelt and bent lower, till her breath warmed his face, and in a moment his cheek was in contact with hers. She was sleeping soundly, and upon her eyelashes there lingered tears.
Darkness and silence ruled everywhere around. Above them rose the primeval yews and oaks of The Chase, in which there poised gentle roosting birds in their last nap; and about them stole the hopping rabbits and hares. But, might some say, where was Tess's guardian angel? where was the providence of her simple faith? Perhaps, like that other god of whom the ironical Tishbite spoke, he was talking, or he was pursuing, or he was in a journey, or he was sleeping and not to be awaked
.

Why it was that upon this beautiful feminine tissue, sensitive as gossamer, and practically blank as snow as yet, there should have been traced such a coarse pattern as it was doomed to receive; why so often the coarse appropriates the finer thus, the wrong man the woman, the wrong woman the man, many thousand years of analytical philosophy have failed to explain to our sense of order. One may, indeed, admit the possibility of a retribution lurking in the present catastrophe. Doubtless some of Tess d'Urberville's mailed ancestors rollicking home from a fray had dealt the same measure even more ruthlessly towards peasant girls of their time. But though to visit the sins of the fathers upon the children may be a morality good enough for divinities, it is scorned by average human nature; and it therefore does not mend the matter.

OP posts:
emotionsecho · 09/05/2016 10:32

I too was disturbed by Angel Clare marrying the sister. I have re-read the book since I studied it and I still cannot put Angel in a good light. I do remember our outraged class discussions about the way he behaved and the teacher trying to get us to see it through the prism of the time it was set in, we remained outraged!

OurBlanche · 09/05/2016 10:01

Blush Grin

BringMeTea · 09/05/2016 09:51

Was 'pint in hand' deliberate Our Blanche? Brilliant either way. Grin
My 15 year old self was more outraged at Angel Clare marrying the sister even though Tess wants that. I must re-read the book as an adult.

OurBlanche · 09/05/2016 09:23

I would agree with Muskey and Marianne. The point is that Tess was suborned, taken advantage of... actions not of her choosing may not mean rape, it may mean grooming, but that is very much a construct of our current social mores. What did it mean back then? Hardy was exploring / decrying / revealing the social mores of his time.

It is a pity that the programme you listened to was not able to discuss it without being so bloody irritating. I think sometimes literary academics get too caught up in the minutiae and forget to link themselves, their thoughts and words, back to the pint in hand.

I was taught that it was rape... however, we were also taught to rethink it (and the sale in Mayor of Casterbridge) in the context in which they were written. What was it Hardy was asking his readers of that time to consider? How was that different to us in the 1970s. I suppose I would now add - and how has that changed again now, in 2016?

Was it rape? is not, in my opinion, the right question to ask of that text. It is too narrow and does not fully explore or acknowledge the social complexities that Tess lived within.

notquitegrownup2 · 09/05/2016 09:16

I agree that it was rape, but also that Hardy makes the issue even more challenging for the Victorian audience, by suggesting that Tess chose to stay with Alec afterwards for some weeks/months, and that he (Hardy) still regarded her as 'a pure woman'

On their wedding night when Tess talks to Angel she says "I was a child when it happened! I knew nothing of men." That's all the reader (and Angel) should need to hear.

MarianneSolong · 09/05/2016 09:03

It's a bit different from a 'real life' situation though.

Tess can't tell us what happened. There aren't any police or CPS.

I don't imagine a modern Tess would go to the police. If she did it's unlikely that they'd take the case forward.

Where would a 21st century Tess end up? In HMP Styal? Maybe later in life - with a drug problem - she'd be ringing a support line to talk about what she'd experienced with Alec as a young and vulnerable woman.

Meanwhile her benefits would be cut/sanctioned she'd be using a food bank and if you were her next door neighbour you'd be complaining on Mumsnet about her volatile behaviour and dodgy 'friends.'

Surelypenguin · 09/05/2016 08:25

I remember concluding that Angel was the true villain too. Don't think I'd see it that way now.

emotionsecho · 09/05/2016 00:24

When I studied the book it was also stressed that Alec had deliberately played on Tess' innocence and purity, manipulated her and used her. Today I suppose we could call it grooming, but there was no room for doubt that Tess was the vulnerable victim.

I also vividly remember how absolutely furious I was with Angel Clare and the way he treated her.

Having said all that it is still one of my favourite books, it made a lasting impression on me so much so that I can still remember how I felt when I first read it all those years ago.

KindDogsTail · 09/05/2016 00:02

Yes, it was.

OP posts:
Surelypenguin · 08/05/2016 23:34

How exactly is something not of Tess's choosing not rape! What a terrible analysis.

KindDogsTail · 08/05/2016 23:17

Yolandi I agree it is absolutely explicit in the text, but not in a prose police report way if the reader if the sort of person who requires that.

Meeep if you haven't read it before, it is a wonderful book though very upsetting.
I am going to read it again too.

I am so glad you thought that way too BakeOff and I am not mad.
I have written in to their contact email, and to Radio 4 feed back to complain. Not least because of similarly raped girls who may have been listening.

OP posts:
KindDogsTail · 08/05/2016 23:09

I've always thought it was obvious she was raped and I first read it over 30 years ago, I didn't realise this was contested until reading this thread.

It was the academics on the radio who were somehow not willing to call it rape.
Partly because Hardy does not give a blow by blow detail of the rape itself and partly because it seems they may have shared that Kenneth Clark sort of flawed idea that it wasn't 'rape rape' because it was not done by a stranger who had also violently attacked her.

34:33 mins into the programme Melvyn Bragg said
Now then what happened.

The answer was:
We can't know. The one thing we can be certain of is that whatever happened was not of Tess's choosing. That, ugh, whether it was it explicitly physical rape, or whether because she was exhausted because her resistance was worn out she kind of gave in. We can't know

I KDT say, if you read chapter 11 & 12 yes, you certainly can know.

She went on:

The question of whether it was an explicit rape, or whether it was some kind of forced seduction doesn't in the end matter to what happened to Tess

Then another man came on and referred to this seduction or rape or whatever it is

This sort of question 'was it rape rather than seduction' is shocking in our era
coming from these academics.

OP posts:
YolandiFuckinVisser · 08/05/2016 23:04

I have never before considered that it might not have been rape. I thought it was implicit in the text.

Meeep · 08/05/2016 22:51

I heard the radio programme and thought I should read the book.
What a shame they daren't say she was raped for some reason if everyone else thinks it was completely clear cut.

bakeoffcake · 08/05/2016 22:48

I heard the programme and ended up shouting at the radio, I was so angry. How the heck they could say "we cannot know" is beyond me.

I switched it off in the end.

KindDogsTail · 08/05/2016 22:47

He did, however, used to spend a lot of time telling the mixed class about boys' urges that they had to fight, and girls' tempting ways

Yes, Shotgun that is exactly what I was trying to say: that if a man could be so tempted by a hanged woman who was doing nothing at all, surely the man himself is the protagonist of his own lust in the end, not the tempting girl - dead or alive.

Hardy must have realised this and used the novel to fight your jesuit's premise about girls' tempting ways.

OP posts:
Surelypenguin · 08/05/2016 22:47

We need an edit button!

Ludwaysl · 08/05/2016 22:47

Not taped, raped. Stupid phone!

Ludwaysl · 08/05/2016 22:46

I've always thought it was obvious she was taped and I first read it over 30 years ago, I didn't realise this was contested until reading this thread.

Surelypenguin · 08/05/2016 22:44

Definitely. The text is slightly clouded by the 'my eyes were blinded by you' passage but I read that in the context of the time. I studied Tess for A level in 1993 and that's certainly what I was taught and how I've read it then and ever since.

KindDogsTail · 08/05/2016 22:41

In the radio programme last Thursday, In Our Time, Tess of the D'Urbervilles (still on Iplayer)
the listeners were told Thomas Hardy's background and the influences this may have had on his writing,

Apparently, when he was an old man of about 70, in some sort of recollection or memoir, he wrote that when he was sixteen he had witnessed the hanging of a beautiful young woman and then seen her hanging there. He had been sexually aroused by the sight. He would presumably have been very upset that he felt this.
He must have wondered too what had happened that this beautiful young girl had been hanged.

This was the inspiration for Tess, who was hanged for murder.

I think Melvyn Bragg said that the book was written as exculpation for his reaction to this poor hanged woman when he was sixteen.

My view, after hearing about this was that his feeling that way about a dead woman might have exemplified for him how men can be aroused by a woman who has not actually done anything intentional on her own part to cause that arousal - in this case she was even dead.

But more often men blame the woman for their own feelings of lust. Tess ended up being hanged because of two men's feelings for her. Yet she was the pure one. In those days she would have been blamed for what happened to her, Hardy was saying she was not the guilty one.

Hardy evidently was very honest with himself in admitting his reaction to the hanged woman. I don't think most people would be able to face that thought if they had it.

OP posts:
ShotgunNotDoingThePans · 08/05/2016 22:35

But I still think it was rape.

Swipe left for the next trending thread