Please or to access all these features

What we're reading

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

Riders - Jilly Cooper Book Club

262 replies

JillyCooperBookClub · 14/03/2016 09:53

It was a perfect spring day. Thickening crimson buds fretted a love-in-the-mist blue sky. The banks were draped with crocuses of the same Lenten purple as the altar cloth. A host of golden daffodils, retarded by the bitter winter, had just reached their prime and nodded their pale heads in approval.

Thus Helen falls for Rupert, and I fell for Jilly Cooper: against our upbringing and our better judgement, and despite every single red flag.

Riders wasn't my first Jilly Cooper, but the first I sought out, after a few stolen pages of another under dappled sun on Guide Camp as a teenager.

It starts deceptively happily, with gymkhanas and very proper sexless dates. But we mustn't be fooled: at every point every character is being judged by every other, and found wanting. Character flaws, damaging childhoods, trauma and tragedy: frankly it's a wonder any one of them made it to adulthood.

Rupert's friendship with Billy predates the neglect and misery of his childhood, so unsurprisingly it is the only healthy and unconditional human relationship he has.

There couldn't be much wrong with Rupert if he inspired friendship like this.

Rupert shivered, suddenly reminded of the desolation of Sunday nights at school, summoned by bells to Evensong, followed by cold ham and bread and marge for supper, and everyone else coming back feeling homesick from days out with their parents. Rupert had never really had a proper home to feel sick about.

And indeed it will be some years before he finds one.

We discussed on the general thread that Rupert is a bit, well, rapey. In Riders he has precisely zero respect for any woman's body autonomy (the very first time he and Helen meet he thrusts his hand into her jumper) and once he has any declared rights over a woman he takes absolute possession of her body.

With a colossal feeling of triumph he pushed her back on to the bed and began to move downwards, kissing her ribs, then her belly.

"No," she gasped, grabbing his head.

Firmly he removed her hands. "Shut up. You're mine now, to do exactly what I like with."

The foursome in Kenya is deeply, deeply troubling. Billy doesn't seem to realise how unwilling Helen is until he has raped her; Rupert is more concerned with how his friends will perceive them, and his response to finding her as dry as a marathon runner's throat is to declare her "useless"; Janey is so turned on by Rupert she doesn't stop to think about it. All three of them assault her together, until she escapes.

Any minute she expected an enraged Rupert to appear and drag her back to the torture chamber.

But the others were enjoying themselves. [...] Playing games of their own, they carried on till morning.

Days later, she falls for Jake: physically and romantically the exact opposite of Rupert. It was inevitable, surely, and as little as I like her I have the greatest sympathy. But I'll never forgive Jake as long as I live.

When I first read Riders I identified strongly with Tory. Poor unloved Tory - considered a fat failure, whilst in truth neither fat nor failing. Jilly is horribly judgemental about an ounce of spare fat on anyone, but she shows us that however miserable Tory might be, she is beautiful and perfect:

She was tallish and big boned, with a huge bust that bounced up and down as she walked. However she stood on the scales, she weighed eleven stone.

(Note: at 5'8", "tallish", that's a BMI of 23.4, and she promptly loses nine pounds when she falls in love, taking her to 22.5)

Actually she was much less far without her clothes on; rather splendid, in fact.

Tory is capable and loyal and loving and stoic and all the characteristics of a balanced human being. She doesn't expect Jake to love her; it's enough that she loves him.

"She loved you," said Fen bitterly. "Isa, Darklis, me, the horses, Wolf, were only extensions of how much she loved you. She knew you didn't love her, but she felt you needed her. That made life easier, that was enough."

"Oh, Christ," Jake groaned, putting his head in his hands. "I only realised in LA how much I loved her. [...] She always seemed so strong that she could cope with anything. I didn't realise I meant so much to her."

[...]

Frantic, he took her in his arms, trying to warm some life into the frail body.

"Don't die," he pleaded for the thousandth time. "Please don't die."

"Jake," came the faintest, faintest whisper.

I was going to talk about snobbery and class, and the animals, and the culture of celebrity, and the freedom of wealth, and Billy, and Malise, and political marriages, and fidelity, but I can't, because tears are streaming down my face yet again and my nose is running. So to cheer myself up, and to evidence Jilly's brilliance, I'll leave you with my favourite exchange:

"Will it be very fancy tonight?"
"Not particularly."
"Shall I wear pants?
Rupert's eyes gleamed. That was getting somewhere. "Certainly not," he said.
[...]
"Chicken, you are wearing pants. What's this?" he pinged the elastic."
"Panties," said Helen quickly. "You thought I'd go to a party without panties?"

OP posts:
EnglishFern · 04/04/2016 10:19

I love them because to me they are quintessentially English. I don't live in the uk anymore and they evoke something for me that I've lost from my life - the rolling countryside, the wild garlic, the villages, the very English humour and turns of phrases. Winter is always deep snowdrifts and apple logs on the fire, and fish pie for supper. Summer is always warm sunshine, nettles, hay in the field, corn stubble, tennis parties and Pimms.

Even though it's probably not an England which many of us know/knew exactly, it's one which we can all recognise.

Plus the characters are so real, as someone else said. Not perfect by any means but their imperfections make them sympathetic and relatable to.

When I was a teen I wanted to be Fen, or Perdita. Brave enough to walk out of an exam and go to the polo. When I was in my 20s I wanted to be Taggie, in my 40s I want to be Lizzie or Maud.

And I was a teen when I read them, which makes them very nostalgic for me. It was a time when I actually thought life might turn out a bit like this before reality hit

Thurlow · 04/04/2016 10:06

very down-to-earth

YY. Her characters don't live in a world where everything is perfect. They can look bad, they can get their clothes wrong (that silver jumpsuit Grin), they need to use the loo and they fart, they serve food that goes wrong, they have housework that needs doing, they can forget to post important letters. There's an awful lot on real, everyday life in Jilly's books.

BalloonSlayer · 04/04/2016 09:54

I am still three quarters of the way through Riders so I am hoping to have finished it by the 18th April deadline!

It has occurred to me that we started this thread because we love Jilly Cooper books yet it has been full of criticism (me being one of the major culprits!). So I wondered, can we say WHY we love Jilly, in particular.

I'd say the reasons I always like Jilly books were:

  1. Being English through-and-through! In the late 70s - early 80s the alternatives were Jackie Collins and Shirley Conran whose - although they were both English - books/characters/plots were very American. (I'm sure there were others but those were the ones I read) Jilly seemed like a breath of fresh air as a comparison. And I would say that the things we have criticised upthread (group sex that is actually rape, sexism, fat-shaming, condoning of adultery etc) are a lot more prevalent in the books of JC and SC than in Jilly's. I remember a Jackie Collins character's attractiveness being summarised as "men didn't know whether to rape her or protect her." Shock
  1. A very down-to-earth approach to matters such as sex, food, housework, grooming. I liked that Jilly characters worry that they need to have a bath or haven't washed their hair or the house looks a mess.
  1. Funny dialogue. Not laugh-out-loud jokes but the sort of funny conversation that real people make.
  1. She tries to explain how her characters tick, I think that's why the later books don't work as she doesn't take the time to do that.

I am sure there's more

Tentative 5. Wanting desperately to buy into the idea that you can transform your whole self in 10 days by going on a diet and having your hair cut. (Fen, who says she hasn't lost the stone and a half Rupert estimated she needed to, but who presumably this means she has lost something near that. AND the diet got rid of her spots FOREVER. Yeah. ) Actually I realise that one has come out as a bit of a criticism. But, you know, whenever I have been feeling down my go-to solution is always to have my hair cut and go on a diet!

Thurlow · 04/04/2016 09:26

as a thin short teenager, I thought anything over 9 stone was fat.

That's so true. I was a huge shortarse and only 7 stone when I started reading Jilly so yes, 11 stone sounded massive Blush (Obviously I know much better now!)

LittleBearPad · 04/04/2016 08:58

I read Rivals first several times. Then I read Riders. I was Shock at Rupert and read Rivals again to make myself feel better Grin

BeautifulMaudOHara · 03/04/2016 23:13

I've finished Rivals too!

TooExtraImmatureCheddar · 03/04/2016 21:23

We sort of see Fen and Dino having sex - him saying wow as he eases himself out of her, anyway.

The weight thing is funny - as a thin short teenager, I thought anything over 9 stone was fat. I had no concept that people who were over 5 foot 2 might be thin but heavier than that. I am now older, fatter and wiser, but I think that's where Jilly was coming from.

Trills · 03/04/2016 19:22

Rivals has the most Rupert-not-being-a-shit...

LittleBearPad · 03/04/2016 19:03

Yeah. Rivals is my favourite.

ChessieFL · 03/04/2016 16:25

Thanks Jilly

JillyCooperBookClub · 03/04/2016 16:17

I'll start a Rivals thread on 18 April (the idea was to space the books fairly evenly until the new one comes out, to give us all a chance to be up to speed given Real Life commitments etc).

OP posts:
ChessieFL · 03/04/2016 15:12

Are we having a separate Rivals thread or just continuing this one?

Thurlow · 29/03/2016 17:07

Actually, we do see Janey and Billy having sex, don't we? But then I never thought Jilly really approved of Janey and Billy...

MrsHathaway · 29/03/2016 17:01

I think that's a very astute observation about marital sex. Off the top of my head, once a couple is married we only see foreplay or games with others.

And I'm reminded that Billy is obsessed with shaving Janey's bush - gets him very excited. I'm guessing that was an unusual preference in 1973-1984?

JillyTheDependableBoot · 29/03/2016 14:16

Actually I think quite a few novels from that period are honest about female sexuality, albeit in a rather overblown way - Judith Krantz, Rona Jaffe, Marge Piercey et al (although I suppose the latter two are feminist writers).

I've also just finished reading Noel Streatfeild's Saplings, which was published in 1945 and has female sexual desire as a key theme. Many of the other Persephone books do too.

Thurlow · 29/03/2016 14:14

Yes, I never thought Taggie would turn out to be like that either!

JillyTheDependableBoot · 29/03/2016 14:09

That's very true about the sex scenes - the only Rupert and Taggie one I can think of is an aside about him painting her labia with olive oil prior to photographing her in the nude, which was clearly put in to make it clear that Taggie is a good wife in the bedroom as well as in the kitchen, but has never rang true to me. I'm sure she would think it a horrible waste of good EVOO.

Thurlow · 29/03/2016 12:16

That's very true, Maud. Jilly is certainly all for her female characters having ambition and desire, and they operate on the same level as men as well. Obviously there's still a lot of anti-feminist stuff in there and the women are often talked down to and constantly sexually harassed - but still, Janey, Perdita, Fen, Cameron, they all have careers alongside men and they aren't criticised in anyway for having them.

The other thing that struck me was that for all these books are 'bonkbusters', you never really see a sex scene between two characters who are really meant to be together. So you get loads of Ruper sex scenes, but not with who he eventually falls in love with. Or you get Fen and Enrico, but not Fen and Dino.

BeautifulMaudOHara · 29/03/2016 11:01

I was thinking about this last night and I think one of the things Jilly does well is write about female desire - plenty of her female characters like sex and I don't know that that was terribly common in writing from the 70s (other than feminist writing) was it? Maybe I'm completely wrong.

JolieMadame · 28/03/2016 09:40

Violet and Eddie are ok, although they take advantage of Daisy a bit. No more so than normal kids do though!

BeautifulMaudOHara · 28/03/2016 09:25

No, Jilly doesn't like children, except as plot devices for showing aspects of an adult's character, eg, Rupert is vile to Marcus and adoring of Tabitha. There's hardly any mention of the children when spoilers spoilers follow....

Helen and Jake run off. Even though they've 4 children between them.

Trills · 27/03/2016 14:08

But they are only small children, Fen is old enough to know better and do things for herself.

MrsHathaway · 27/03/2016 13:14

Doesn't Dino scream at them just as much as Fen for taking advantage? That has to be in Riders.

JillyTheDependableBoot · 27/03/2016 13:07

Darklis doesn't appear in any subsequent books, does she? I imagine the example her home life gave her would result in her becoming a bit of a doormat and marrying an abusive/unfaithful man.

Trills · 27/03/2016 12:48

The Lovell kids in Riders are just "nice kids, play with the horses, relaxed and happy" to contrast with Marcus and Tab. They don't really have much of a personality (yet).

Swipe left for the next trending thread