Please or to access all these features

30 days only

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Social services asking me to have son and girlfriend and baby living with me

461 replies

TheOchreEagle · 19/10/2026 12:45

My son is 19 autistic and still at college and lives at home, he has got his girlfriend pregnant it seems intentionally. Social services have asked us to house them half the week in his bedroom. My partner is not at all happy with the idea. I think it could potentially destroy our relationship.

I feel so torn I don’t believe it will work his bedroom is right next to ours and we would hear every noise. He is very resistant to being told anything and i don’t think his girlfriend would be very receptive to any advice.

They both have learning disabilities so would need close monitoring which would be difficult. I work at home as well as being a carer for my mother who although currently in a care home still makes demands on my time.

Social services have said there would be support but as it has taken 3 months to hear anything i find that doubtful.

I do want to help but living with us is just too much. Anyone had any experience of this or can offer any advice.

OP posts:
FlyingCatGirl · 20/10/2026 18:38

Teainapinkcup · 19/10/2026 13:35

SAD... what a heart you have for people.

You aren't being realistic as to how hard this would be for the OP!

Foodwench66 · 20/10/2026 18:37

I would say no. You don't even have to take calls from them, IMO.
Can SS not help Son and gf find housing and services that are available to them like they would if you were not here?
So I'd tell them it's not possible.
I would think Son can live with you, where he lives now, I am assuming and the gf and baby can live with her mom....where she currently lives. If her mom wants her out then SS will have to try and help her with housing I guess.....

mylifestory · 20/10/2026 18:26

Very tricky. I assume they've asked the girls mother and she has said no, as that'd be the first port of call. Try to find out their intentions as all ss are out to do it take kids away. I know ud want to avoid this so while u can say no, do engage with them to find a better solution for all of them

Weald56 · 20/10/2026 18:04

Terfedout · 19/10/2026 13:44

Absolutely no fucking way. And social services will wash their hands of you as soon as they have palmed the issue off onto you. Good luck with whatever you decide though!

This 100%.

rosie1873 · 20/10/2026 17:54

Say no. The repercussions later on would be devastating.

DraigCymraeg · 20/10/2026 15:33

MyLifeInBooks · 19/10/2026 12:52

Just say no it would not work due to your work commitments. It's an easy fix for SS to house the young family with you. See what else they come up with, you can always retract and have them living with you. On the other hand, once they have moved in, it will be more difficult to find them something more appropriate.

This definitely.
Once the little family are with OP, that is were they will stay!

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 20/10/2026 15:31

ThreadGuardDog · 20/10/2026 15:07

No, I think the point here is that if they are never going to be able to parent without needing the equivalent of full time support (as OP is being asked to give) then the situation has to be reviewed because adoption would be the obvious alternative. People seem to think that social services have an obligation to provide indefinite support in these situations and this just isn’t the case. Sometimes the best solution all round isn’t necessarily the one the parents would choose for themselves.

Yes exactly
I would never say anyone should be raising a relative's child to prevent them from going into care - many people choose to but it must be a free choice. However it needs to be explored before the draconian step of removal is contemplated. That is the law, not 'social services wanting to do the least'

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 20/10/2026 15:29

Scrapsy · 20/10/2026 15:06

If social services are saying they gonna be involved why cant they get them there own place. Sounds like they trying to find a solution where they will have minimum involvement

Social services don't get people their own places.

ThreadGuardDog · 20/10/2026 15:11

Scrapsy · 20/10/2026 15:06

If social services are saying they gonna be involved why cant they get them there own place. Sounds like they trying to find a solution where they will have minimum involvement

Social services have no input into housing. They can make recommendations to the local housing authority but they have no authority other than that and it’s down to availability, suitability and cost. Child services will have input into the safeguarding of the baby and adult social care will possibly provide a package of care and support, but it’s neither practical nor reasonable to expect this to be in place indefinitely if there is no prospect of these two people being able to parent without significant support. Adoption would be the better option.

ThreadGuardDog · 20/10/2026 15:07

Iris2020 · 20/10/2026 13:49

You expect her to send herself.to an early grave doing it forever?

No, I think the point here is that if they are never going to be able to parent without needing the equivalent of full time support (as OP is being asked to give) then the situation has to be reviewed because adoption would be the obvious alternative. People seem to think that social services have an obligation to provide indefinite support in these situations and this just isn’t the case. Sometimes the best solution all round isn’t necessarily the one the parents would choose for themselves.

Scrapsy · 20/10/2026 15:06

If social services are saying they gonna be involved why cant they get them there own place. Sounds like they trying to find a solution where they will have minimum involvement

ThreadGuardDog · 20/10/2026 15:04

WearyAuldWumman · 20/10/2026 14:56

Most people don't have to cope with caring for two disabled adults plus a child. It's really too much.

My caring responsibilities started when was 36, I think, and continued until I was about 61. I've never been in the OP's position, but at one point was working full-time and caring for three adults, though there was no hands on care at the very beginning - by that time, I was a bit older and looking after only two.

I suspect that the OP is older than I was. it's highly unlikely that she'll outlive her DS, the GF and the baby. The short-term 'solution' of splitting the new family between the OP and the GF's mother is simply not going to work.

I would have thought that any assessment of the support needed for them to live independently would have looked at not only the cost of housing and any support package, but also for how long that support would have to be in place. If there is no prospect of them being able to parent without permanent and substantial support then adoption would be the alternative. It sounds harsh but the reality is that there simply isn’t the funding available to support this kind of situation indefinitely.

WearyAuldWumman · 20/10/2026 14:56

Constantrunner · 20/10/2026 14:32

@Iris2020 most people become either carers or cared for in later life. Happens to nearly everyone

Most people don't have to cope with caring for two disabled adults plus a child. It's really too much.

My caring responsibilities started when was 36, I think, and continued until I was about 61. I've never been in the OP's position, but at one point was working full-time and caring for three adults, though there was no hands on care at the very beginning - by that time, I was a bit older and looking after only two.

I suspect that the OP is older than I was. it's highly unlikely that she'll outlive her DS, the GF and the baby. The short-term 'solution' of splitting the new family between the OP and the GF's mother is simply not going to work.

ThreadGuardDog · 20/10/2026 14:55

Constantrunner · 20/10/2026 14:32

@Iris2020 most people become either carers or cared for in later life. Happens to nearly everyone

Doesn’t alter the fact that she would be caring for two significantly disabled adults and a child. And with no end date. It would also cost her her relationship. I think that’s a huge ask.

Constantrunner · 20/10/2026 14:32

@Iris2020 most people become either carers or cared for in later life. Happens to nearly everyone

Iris2020 · 20/10/2026 13:49

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 19/10/2026 14:04

What a strange attitude. They will expect her to support them to parent her grandchild. And why not? Who else should be doing that? The state, for the next 18 years!?

You expect her to send herself.to an early grave doing it forever?

EchoParkBrewery · 20/10/2026 13:37

The OP @TheOchreEaglehas not returned to the post to confirm what level of support her son and his girlfriend need or currently have so it’s very difficult to offer advice as the spectrum of possible scenarios here is huge.

theearthsayshello · 20/10/2026 13:30

Lifesd · 20/10/2026 07:38

I agree with this. Time and time again I’m reading if here that adults, SEN or not, are getting themselves into situations and older women and the taxpayer are expected to pick up the pieces. I wouldn’t support this - when will they ever stand on own two feet?

Agree.

theearthsayshello · 20/10/2026 13:29

For some reason my reply to someone else, who asked if they had considered abortion was deleted, one of them was anyway

So just to say again, I would definitely have asked if abortion was a possiblity.

Constantrunner · 20/10/2026 13:19

Yes the only legal responsibility is to the baby yet to be born. And that responsibility does not have to mean supporting the parents.

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 20/10/2026 12:01

ThreadGuardDog · 20/10/2026 08:45

Sorry but social services are not directly or solely responsible for providing housing for young adults with learning disabilities who are parents. The statutory responsibility is with the local housing authority.

Children’s services become involved to safeguard the child and in situations where a child is at risk of homelessness or separation from the parents, they can sometimes fund emergency accommodation, but this is a temporary safety net, not a long-term housing obligation. Adult social care will assess for and where possible arrange any necessary support packages for safe and independent living. They can also provide independent living skills training, but they have no obligation to provide or fund housing.

LA provision differs from area to area and in our region there is an integrated system of adult learning disability teams, children's services, and housing departments working together, but as with everything, budget constraints apply and if the parents require substantial and long term help in order to be able to parent, then adoption would be considered.

Edited

I think a lot of people posting on this thread have direct experience of adult social care which is colouring their responses and also creating a misunderstanding about the legal duty of children's social work family help. There seems to be an idea that lifelong support is legally required under the children act which unless the child is disabled themselves (which still doesn't create any kind of legal duty to house and support their parents) is not the case. Posters are fixated on social services 'palming off' responsibility to the grandparents where there is simply no such legal duty in existence.

maggisimpson · 20/10/2026 10:15

Half a week here/there is not going to work full time so either you will end up taking full responsibility, her mum will or social services will have to.

If you do feel able to do this, I would assume it will become full time and you won't get any outside support.

theearthsayshello · 20/10/2026 09:51

Todayismyfavouriteday · 20/10/2026 05:44

Two young parents with learning disabilities, and an autistic father. Is abortion an option? Followed by strict, supervised/permanent contraception until they are older and work out their own issues, if that is possible.

Agree. It would have been my first thought tbh.

ThreadGuardDog · 20/10/2026 08:45

FoldItIn · 19/10/2026 15:03

Social Services are absolutely responsible for housing two young adults with Learning disabilities, who are parents. Who SS themselves have deemed suitable to care for that child. Where on earth do you live?

Sorry but social services are not directly or solely responsible for providing housing for young adults with learning disabilities who are parents. The statutory responsibility is with the local housing authority.

Children’s services become involved to safeguard the child and in situations where a child is at risk of homelessness or separation from the parents, they can sometimes fund emergency accommodation, but this is a temporary safety net, not a long-term housing obligation. Adult social care will assess for and where possible arrange any necessary support packages for safe and independent living. They can also provide independent living skills training, but they have no obligation to provide or fund housing.

LA provision differs from area to area and in our region there is an integrated system of adult learning disability teams, children's services, and housing departments working together, but as with everything, budget constraints apply and if the parents require substantial and long term help in order to be able to parent, then adoption would be considered.

HopeMumsnet · 20/10/2026 08:31

Hi all,
We are just flagging that we have moved this thread now at the OP's request, to a more specialist board that is frequented by parents of children with special needs. The support has been characteristically great, no doubt, but this is a very intense situation for anyone to cope with so as the thread continues in its new home if we could keep the focus very much on supporting this mother that would be sincerely appreciated.