Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

30 days only

Lindsay Clancy case: was it evil, or severe mental illness?

935 replies

KellyK2026 · 04/09/2026 16:50

Lindsay Clancy, what do we all think? Pure evil or mentally ill?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thread gallery
8
mulberrymilk · Today 00:17

OpenScroller · Today 00:09

On reading a bit more on this case (I hadn't paid much attention until Friday), another things that blows her 'psychosis' defence out of the water IMO is that she threw herself out of the window when she heard Patrick come home.

She had gone into the bedroom upstairs, locked the door and put her smart watch in the dressing table drawer, then made the superficial cuts.

If she really was in the grip of psychosis she would have followed through and cut her carotid artery, as it seems that was her intention from her internet search, but couldn't go through with it.

From her smart watch, it seems she put it in the drawer at around 5.38pm as that is when the system last logged data indicating she'd climbed 2 flights of stairs an Patrick arrived back at 6.09pm so she was dithering for almost 30 minutes.

That shows she was in control of her faculties because if you were, you WOULD hesitate before cutting the major artery in your neck!

Maybe she hadn't planned for the scenario where she couldn't do it so Patrick coming home finding her alive?

She must have panicked when she heard Patrick come in and start knocking at the door, so threw herself out of the window, possibly not realising the implications of the grassy ground below being rock hard or not caring, because she was going to have to face the reality of what she'd done to their kids and that she hadn't been able to follow through with killing herself by the method she'd planned to.

That again shows rational thought.

The drop was around 13 foot and survivable. It was only because she fell on her head that she had such severe injury, but that may have been unintentional in the rush to get out before he got the door open and she had to face him.

Don't mind being corrected if I've got facts wrong.

That's really interesting about the timing.

It seems she did a whole lot of hesitating, after the enormous ruthlessness of killing her children one by one.

It also explains the amount of blood in the bedroom if she was hanging around in there dripping bits from her minor wrist lacerations for some time.

If she really was in the grip of psychosis she would have followed through and cut her carotid artery, as it seems that was her intention from her internet search, but couldn't go through with it.

Someone in the grip of psychosis wouldn't make a few little hesitation cuts that don't require stitching, they'd just slit their throat, successfully or not.

OpenScroller · Today 00:09

On reading a bit more on this case (I hadn't paid much attention until Friday), another things that blows her 'psychosis' defence out of the water IMO is that she threw herself out of the window when she heard Patrick come home.

She had gone into the bedroom upstairs, locked the door and put her smart watch in the dressing table drawer, then made the superficial cuts.

If she really was in the grip of psychosis she would have followed through and cut her carotid artery, as it seems that was her intention from her internet search, but couldn't go through with it.

From her smart watch, it seems she put it in the drawer at around 5.38pm as that is when the system last logged data indicating she'd climbed 2 flights of stairs an Patrick arrived back at 6.09pm so she was dithering for almost 30 minutes.

That shows she was in control of her faculties because if you were, you WOULD hesitate before cutting the major artery in your neck!

Maybe she hadn't planned for the scenario where she couldn't do it so Patrick coming home finding her alive?

She must have panicked when she heard Patrick come in and start knocking at the door, so threw herself out of the window, possibly not realising the implications of the grassy ground below being rock hard or not caring, because she was going to have to face the reality of what she'd done to their kids and that she hadn't been able to follow through with killing herself by the method she'd planned to.

That again shows rational thought.

The drop was around 13 foot and survivable. It was only because she fell on her head that she had such severe injury, but that may have been unintentional in the rush to get out before he got the door open and she had to face him.

Don't mind being corrected if I've got facts wrong.

mulberrymilk · Yesterday 23:15

KellyK2026 · Yesterday 16:12

Nobody has said that you can’t participate on this Thread if you haven’t watched the full trial. But if you’re going to write barefaced lies, like ‘LC wrote in her diary that she hated her son’ be prepared to be called out for it by people who have done their research. Unfortunately rather than admitting they were wrong, some commenters have doubled down.

What about your "bare-faced lies" that you doubled down on and repeated at least half a dozen times if not more - happy to search them all out and repeat them in a long long post - about what the prosecution had to prove in this case?

mulberrymilk · Yesterday 23:10

Aluna · Yesterday 16:04

She was given Zoloft and despite her bad reaction the dose was doubled.

When she was later given Prozac, another SSRI, she did not report a good reaction to it, no. She reported intensifying insomnia and anxiety.

Why she was re-prescribed it with that history idk.

After that she was given Seroquel (bipolar med) by a nurse practitioner which caused a significant turn for the worse which ended up in hospitalisation and the med was stopped.

It’s not that SSRIs may “trigger bipolar” from scratch but that they may trigger mania/hypomania in someone with an underlying tendency to bipolar. Just as they may trigger depressive symptoms in susceptible individuals.

Edited

Are you a psychiatrist? Because I'm not.

She was given Zoloft in mid-September by her original psychiatrist and delayed taking it for two weeks, and then took it for one week - in early October 2024.

The sudden and brief "psychosis" with "command hallucinations" was in January 2023.

She was given Prozac at a very low dose (10mg) in November by another practitioner (psychiatric nurse practictioner). For example, my friend is on 300mg daily, and the usual starting dose as far as I am aware is 20mg.

Years ago, she had taken Prozac with good results, apparently.

Clearly she didn't continue with it, care of unpleasant side-effects.

The original shrink, Tufts, restarts her in mid-December along with a mood stabiliser which is the regime designed to temper the side-effects of SSRIs, as told to me by a shrink who was bipolar himself.

In amongst that mix was a slew of benzos and later some antipsychotics - which are among the drugs a person with bipolar might be prescribed, so I can't see how they (Seroquel, eg) would be the worst thing someone who was bipolar (which she has now been diagnosed with, after the fact, and frankly bipolar 2 is just another diagnosis, doesn't mean it's the right one) could take.

Why she felt the need to move from one to the other concurrently, when this is not the general practice and as a nurse she ought to know to stick with one psychiatrist or get another regular one to stick with, not see multiple doctors and prescribing nurses at the same time alongside one another beats me.

BingoJingo · Yesterday 22:53

OpenScroller · Yesterday 22:44

Why did she obey this 'command voice', which she'd never heard before?

She was lucid enough to call Patrick back, while committing the murders, when she missed his call and answered his question without raising his suspicions other than she sounded 'busy'. Can you imagine his memory of that phone call after he knew what she was doing. Horrific!

Usually in cases where insanity pleas are used, the 'voice' telling the murderer to do these things is 'God' commanding them. Not a random man.

It's utter bullshit.

Edited

I totally agree. What Patrick has endured is beyond torture and the way he has been vilified and blamed is disgusting.

I think it is seems that people would prefer to believe that she was a victim of an outside entity commanding her to kill her children when all the evidence points to her doing it herself in control of her faculties.

How is it in any way feasible that she committed these killings under the control of a command voice but at the same time she was able speak coherently and rationaly to Patrick about the medicine he was collecting during these killings?

Utter bullshit indeed.

OpenScroller · Yesterday 22:44

BingoJingo · Yesterday 22:19

I agree with this. I think it is highly concerning that killers can utilise a vague and unsubstantiated 'psychotic' episode as their defence.

If you hear the details of this psychosis it is clear that she in fact made decisions independent of this supposed 'command voice' in order to to execute the killings, such as the manner of death and choice of murder weapon, order of killings etc.

It appears to me that it was cooked up with her defence when she was in hospital after the deaths.

Why she is given an outpouring of sympathy for the cold and callous murder of her children is just unfathomable to me.

Why did she obey this 'command voice', which she'd never heard before?

She was lucid enough to call Patrick back, while committing the murders, when she missed his call and answered his question without raising his suspicions other than she sounded 'busy'. Can you imagine his memory of that phone call after he knew what she was doing. Horrific!

Usually in cases where insanity pleas are used, the 'voice' telling the murderer to do these things is 'God' commanding them. Not a random man.

It's utter bullshit.

BingoJingo · Yesterday 22:19

UserDownTheRoad · Yesterday 22:14

If we accept that postpartum mental illness or drugs can alter someone’s brain and diminish their capacity for rational thought or control, why do we treat other forms of brain alteration, like severe childhood trauma which happened to many serial killers etc, as NOT a valid defence?

I just think it’s a slippery slope to let people off the hook based on what they say their feelings were when they murdered their children.

I agree with this. I think it is highly concerning that killers can utilise a vague and unsubstantiated 'psychotic' episode as their defence.

If you hear the details of this psychosis it is clear that she in fact made decisions independent of this supposed 'command voice' in order to to execute the killings, such as the manner of death and choice of murder weapon, order of killings etc.

It appears to me that it was cooked up with her defence when she was in hospital after the deaths.

Why she is given an outpouring of sympathy for the cold and callous murder of her children is just unfathomable to me.

UserDownTheRoad · Yesterday 22:14

If we accept that postpartum mental illness or drugs can alter someone’s brain and diminish their capacity for rational thought or control, why do we treat other forms of brain alteration, like severe childhood trauma which happened to many serial killers etc, as NOT a valid defence?

I just think it’s a slippery slope to let people off the hook based on what they say their feelings were when they murdered their children.

BingoJingo · Yesterday 22:08

Aluna · Yesterday 22:04

You might like to read the testimony again.

Can't answer then? Thought not.

BingoJingo · Yesterday 22:08

Aluna · Yesterday 22:05

You sound as well informed on the LL case as you are on the LC.

I think I’ve come to the end of my patience.

Thank God for that!

Aluna · Yesterday 22:05

BingoJingo · Yesterday 22:01

What is 'coming' then?

Are you being slightly delusional here as it sounds like it?

You sound as credible as Nigel Farage to be honest.

You sound as well informed on the LL case as you are on the LC.

I think I’ve come to the end of my patience.

Aluna · Yesterday 22:04

BingoJingo · Yesterday 22:00

She didnt take all her drugs!! What are you on about?

What was each drug, how long had she taken them for, and what was the severe side effects reported?

Whom did she report them to?

I did listen to the testimony and she was given very very low and conservative amounts of drugs. She went to different practioners for her own reasons. If she is not open in her disclosures that is on her. She went to hospital and did not disclose she had taken a TCH gummy did she?

She did NOT disclose any thoughts of harming her children to the psychiatrists.

You might like to read the testimony again.

BingoJingo · Yesterday 22:01

Aluna · Yesterday 22:00

Ok, well what’s coming will be a surprise then.

What is 'coming' then?

Are you being slightly delusional here as it sounds like it?

You sound as credible as Nigel Farage to be honest.

BingoJingo · Yesterday 22:00

Aluna · Yesterday 20:58

Idk if this is uniformed or disingenuous.

If you read the testimony - each drug she was given caused severe side effects - nonetheless thé practitioner tended to increase the dose. When that produced even worse side effects thé drug was changed.

It’s not that they weren’t given long enough to work it’s that the side effects were too severe to continue.

She was prescribed 2 SSRIs which are contraindicated in bipolar, when those failed she was given a bipolar drug that caused even worse side effects. At that point she was admitted to hospital who took her off that drug to stabilise her, but then gave her another AD a which triggered suicidal ideation and thoughts of harming her children. That was shortly before the suicide attempt/killings.

She didnt take all her drugs!! What are you on about?

What was each drug, how long had she taken them for, and what was the severe side effects reported?

Whom did she report them to?

I did listen to the testimony and she was given very very low and conservative amounts of drugs. She went to different practioners for her own reasons. If she is not open in her disclosures that is on her. She went to hospital and did not disclose she had taken a TCH gummy did she?

She did NOT disclose any thoughts of harming her children to the psychiatrists.

Aluna · Yesterday 22:00

BingoJingo · Yesterday 21:50

I know.. Those jurors who listened to weeks and weeks of evidence and testimony and drew a distinction between cases where she was clearly guilty and those where the evidence was not compelling enough.. You of course know more than them.

And you know more than her KC defence counsel who only put up a plumber as the single defence witness.

Ok, well what’s coming will be a surprise then.

BingoJingo · Yesterday 21:50

Aluna · Yesterday 21:47

Yeah I’m sure it is. That’s what posters said about LL. But they agree with me now.

I know.. Those jurors who listened to weeks and weeks of evidence and testimony and drew a distinction between cases where she was clearly guilty and those where the evidence was not compelling enough.. You of course know more than them.

And you know more than her KC defence counsel who only put up a plumber as the single defence witness.

Aluna · Yesterday 21:47

BingoJingo · Yesterday 21:43

And your relentless defence of a child killer is very very concerning to me.

Yeah I’m sure it is. That’s what posters said about LL. But they agree with me now.

BingoJingo · Yesterday 21:43

Aluna · Yesterday 21:40

JT wasn’t familiar with anything, this was her first psychiatrist job ever.

In the U.K. nurse practitioners cannot diagnose bipolar - which is what seems to have happened later with LC - and then gave her a drug which made her much worse. They can shell out drugs here though, which perturbs the friends of mine who are psychiatrists as they don’t have full medical training.

Your confidence in LC’s practitioners indicates you either have a low bar or zero experience in this area.

Edited

And your relentless defence of a child killer is very very concerning to me.

BingoJingo · Yesterday 21:43

I would beg to differ, seeing as it take 12 years of education and training, see below. But you continue with your barrack room psychiatry. Why are you making the comparison with nurse practitioners in the UK? How bizarre.

To become a board-certified psychiatrist in the USA, you must complete about 12 years of education and training, earn a medical degree, finish a four-year residency, and pass the specialty certification exams.

  1. Undergraduate Education (4 Years)
  • Earn a bachelor's degree at a college or university.
  • Take pre-medical science courses like biology, chemistry, and physics.
  • Take the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) to apply to medical school.
  1. Medical School (4 Years)
  • Attend an accredited medical school to earn an M.D. (Doctor of Medicine) or D.O. (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine) degree.
  • Pass national licensing tests like the USMLE or COMLEX-USA. 1, 2, 3, 4]
  1. Psychiatry Residency (4 Years)
  • Complete an accredited residency program in general psychiatry. 1, 2]

As stated by the American Psychiatric Association, “The psychiatrist-in-training then spends at least three additional years learning the diagnosis and treatment of mental health, including various forms of psychotherapy and the use of psychiatric medications and other treatments.”
(Most programs total four years).

  • Obtain a full, unexpired, and unrestricted state medical license. 1, 2]
  1. Board Certification Exam

What Is A Psychiatrist? What They Do and When to See One

A psychiatrist is a medical doctor who can diagnose and treat mental health conditions. They can prescribe medications and other medical treatments.

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/22702-psychiatrist

sunshinegirl28 · Yesterday 21:41

I think Patrick did it and told her and everyone else that she did it

Aluna · Yesterday 21:40

BingoJingo · Yesterday 21:23

My understanding is that they were familiar with the presentation of psychosis and were confident that she did not display such signs. And LC chose Jennifer Tufts so she could have swapped her out if she was not confident in her ability?

So until these experts are confirmed as being inept or incomptent, then I will believe in their judgement as board certified psyciatrists.

JT wasn’t familiar with anything, this was her first psychiatrist job ever.

In the U.K. nurse practitioners cannot diagnose bipolar - which is what seems to have happened later with LC - and then gave her a drug which made her much worse. They can shell out drugs here though, which perturbs the friends of mine who are psychiatrists as they don’t have full medical training.

Your confidence in LC’s practitioners indicates you either have a low bar or zero experience in this area.

BingoJingo · Yesterday 21:39

BruachAbhann · Yesterday 21:35

You're obviously not bothered to read my posts properly and I'm not going to bother engaging with you any further.

We know that @Aluna would be outside the Plymouth court, wearing pink, throwing heart signs in support of dear Lindsay...

EasternStandard · Yesterday 21:39

Aluna · Yesterday 21:33

Uhuh, in the grip of mental illness.

‘Uhuh’

So the jury will decide.

BruachAbhann · Yesterday 21:35

Aluna · Yesterday 20:21

@BruachAbhann

using long-distance, high-profile charity to ignore the immediate suffering of women close to home

Why would you think it meant that? I would have thought it self-explanatory from the sentence:

“I don’t personally indulge misogynist telescopic philanthropy which focuses on the children to the exclusion of LC”

I meant a narrowly directed concern focused solely on the children to the exclusion of their mother. That is the misogyny.

You did try to imply I was misogynist with the following words:

”you are indulging in 'misogynist telescopic philanthropy'”

There is nothing misogynist whatsoever in anything I have said.

As to the claim there’s not sufficient evidence to show she was psychotic - there was plenty of evidence at the trial of psychotic symptoms so either you didn’t bother to follow the evidence or you didn’t realise that’s what they were.

You're obviously not bothered to read my posts properly and I'm not going to bother engaging with you any further.

Aluna · Yesterday 21:33

EasternStandard · Yesterday 21:23

Well yes reading back I agree with you in the first part of the post.

I still agree with @BingoJingoon PC which is a broader point on anyone blaming him.

As for ‘sensitive re PC’ and ‘heaping blame on LC’ that’s a bit strange given she did it.

Uhuh, in the grip of mental illness.