Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Charles Spencer's book Diana Swan Song etc etc . Thread the second.

115 replies

BasiliskStare · 25/09/2026 14:14

There has been interest from some who engaged with the topic , so I'm starting a new thread as we are on page 10 . I honestly didn't think it would engender so much interest.

Let me be absolutely clear here. Threads meander , and sometimes go off topic and sometimes amusingly and interestingly so. My intention with this thread is to discuss the book , related matters eg contemporaneous accounts, reviews , interviews etc I'm also , frankly, interested to see how Piers Morgan's reaction to it goes.

As has been so often said anyone is allowed to post whatever they like on a public forum. I'm just explaining why I have started this thread. I have no intention of policing it .

Let's see how it goes 😎

OP posts:
FramboiseRoyale · Yesterday 15:28

A bit off-topic, but I notice that the review mentions the memoir of Alathea Fitzalan Howard, The Windsor Diaries, My Childhood with the Princesses Elizabeth and Margaret. This is a fascinating read. I highly recommend it.

JustAnotherWhinger · Yesterday 17:03

I would love to know when he started writing this. Before or after his own memoir and its success. Given it came out in 2024 and he said he had a breakdown requiring residential care after his own book that doesn’t seem like a long time to write it.

Also would be interesting to know if it was always intended to come out now.

bluegreygreen · Yesterday 17:32

Robert Fellowes died 2 years ago.

It may have been started before he died, but I suspect it was never going to be published while he was still alive.

Fellowes was in a unique position. He was part of the Spencer family, and he was involved in much of the organisation of Diana's funeral (as well as other Royal Household discussions) as a private secretary to the Queen.

He would have been able to confirm or deny many of the statements in the book.

ETA I feel a great deal of sympathy for Jane Fellowes (as well as her sister). Charles S says his sisters were hurt when he told them about the book. He doesn't strike me as someone who would pick up on subtle signs of others' upset, so they may have been quite distressed.

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 17:37

Surprised there were no comments on Diana’s affairs with married men

Cathandkin · Yesterday 17:41

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 17:37

Surprised there were no comments on Diana’s affairs with married men

I'm not

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 17:42

Cathandkin · Yesterday 17:41

I'm not

Why ? Because he adored her? He also criticised her

smilesy · Yesterday 17:51

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 17:42

Why ? Because he adored her? He also criticised her

He doesn’t seem to have criticised her particularly after she was married in the book if I understand correctly. He seems to have then pointed her as a victim. Probably so he could continue with his pantomime villain port of Charles

JustAnotherWhinger · Yesterday 18:00

smilesy · Yesterday 17:51

He doesn’t seem to have criticised her particularly after she was married in the book if I understand correctly. He seems to have then pointed her as a victim. Probably so he could continue with his pantomime villain port of Charles

He revealed to all that she was a married mother-of-two when she assaulted her step-mother by pushing her down the stairs.

i do wonder if he realised that most people assumed that had happened when Diana was a child.

I can’t imagine that the biggest revelation about his sister personally was meant to be that one.

smilesy · Yesterday 18:09

JustAnotherWhinger · Yesterday 18:00

He revealed to all that she was a married mother-of-two when she assaulted her step-mother by pushing her down the stairs.

i do wonder if he realised that most people assumed that had happened when Diana was a child.

I can’t imagine that the biggest revelation about his sister personally was meant to be that one.

No I agree. I wonder if he forgot that revealing her age when she pushed Raine meant revealing that she did it when she was married with children?

Allseeingallknowing · Yesterday 18:10

LambriniBobInIsleworthISeesYa · 25/09/2026 23:54

I finished it yesterday and quite enjoyed it, but it’s patchy and the titles of the chapters didn’t work IMO. I also didn’t believe the story about Nelson Mandela visiting Diana’s grave and having to have a bridge put up for him as he was too old to go in a rowboat (or something similar). Seems like a weird thing to make up, but equally didn’t ring true.

I didn’t think it was made up- why would he do that?

JustAnotherWhinger · Yesterday 18:17

@LambriniBobInIsleworthISeesYaThere are photos of Nelson Mandela at Althorp and he is walking across a bridge

JustAnotherWhinger · Yesterday 18:19

smilesy · Yesterday 18:09

No I agree. I wonder if he forgot that revealing her age when she pushed Raine meant revealing that she did it when she was married with children?

It would be very odd if he meant to announce to the world that she was a fully grown adult at the time.

diddl · Yesterday 19:51

Popularity and childhood bedrooms are irrelevant to primogeniture.

It's odd as surely the Spencer children already had their rooms before Raine moved in?

Two of her children were adults & I think the younger two remained with their father.

BasiliskStare · Yesterday 23:58

MrsFinkelstein · Yesterday 10:29

@BasiliskStare @FunPartyIdeas regarding his different memories of their childhood - it just occurs to me that his perspective maybe totally skewed.

He is the longed for son of a man who was determined to have one, regardless of his wife's health, while Diana was the 3rd daughter of a man increasingly desperate to have a son. Their treatment and parental affection was unlikely to be similar. Charles was the golden child - the future Earl. Diana was yet another girl.

Did Spencer acknowledge this in the book?

I haven't gone back and checked ( Kindle - inexpert at search function and tapping to and fro a pain in the arse ) but I would say yes Johnny did want a son. I also recall CS referring to D being the apple of his father's eye . I'm not convinced from my reading Diana's early life was miserable because she was not a boy. But those who have read / listened please correct me if I am wrong.

OP posts:
FramboiseRoyale · Today 03:38

BasiliskStare · Yesterday 23:58

I haven't gone back and checked ( Kindle - inexpert at search function and tapping to and fro a pain in the arse ) but I would say yes Johnny did want a son. I also recall CS referring to D being the apple of his father's eye . I'm not convinced from my reading Diana's early life was miserable because she was not a boy. But those who have read / listened please correct me if I am wrong.

I just finished it in a couple of days. CS doesn't dwell on the issue of possible parental disappointment in Diana's sex, but I'm assuming from the circumstances and from other things that I have read that surely they wanted Diana to be a boy. However, it doesn't appear from anything in the book that her parents loved her any less because she was a girl. By all accounts, Johnny Spencer was a doting and involved father, and he and Diana had a particularly close relationship.

From what I have read in other accounts, it appears that Diana's unhappy childhood stemmed primarily from her parents' divorce, not from being treated differently because she was a girl. However, I can certainly understand that a system (agnatic primogeniture) which inherently values males over females could certainly make a girl think that she was perhaps surplus to requirements. I cannot imagine growing up or raising children in such an environment.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread