Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

What are you good people at MN doing getting involved in a tie in with *Aptamil*???????

221 replies

moondog · 12/08/2005 18:28

Wonder how many feel as disappointed as me????

OP posts:
bubblerock · 13/08/2005 09:33

Can you imagine - 9 out of 10 babies prefer Aptimil

Pruni · 13/08/2005 09:17

Message withdrawn

harpsichordcarrier · 13/08/2005 07:50

Sorry = long post, but I have been thinking about this overnight.

Bf is the best thing for babies - that is the absolute truth. Not just a little bit better, but the very best thing by a wide margin, and in lots of different ways. Yet bf rates are still pathetically low.

Lots of women are put off bf by social pressures (the kind of attitudes that say bf is offensive, will make your boobs sag, none of their friends do it, etc), and because (frankly)in the early days it is often bloody hard.

Given that is the case, then we should encourage as many women as possible to bf for as long as possible so that they and their babies get the significant health benefits.

So, banning advertising is part of a package of things to encourage more bf, incl information campaigns, leaflets, providing support to bf mothers. Lots of this work is done by charities and vol orgs. And I suppose part of this is making formula feeding less acceptable because (really, truly) it is not as good as bf.

Banning advertising works because advertising works. I think some of the comments on here are breathtakingly naive - that women won't be persuaded to formula feed by adverts, that it won't make any difference. This is nonsense - advertising WORKS and that's what companies do it. (and yes I do hear people say, even now, that formula is just as good as breastmilk, or that they wouldn't sell it if it wasn't.)

I am sorry if any of this is offensive to anyone, but just to be clear, it s not about criticising individuals who have chosen not to bf. Everyone has their own reasons, and their choices are no-one else's business. People should have a free choice but they shouldn't be influenced to use formula either, and they should have the full facts.

BUT I think anyone who is offended by the idea of banning formula advertising needs to get a bit of perspective - it's not about YOU after all, it's about the health of ALL babies, and tbh I think anyone who does think it is about them is being the tiniest bit self-obsessed.

hercules · 13/08/2005 07:18

If formula companies were allowed to advertise just imagine what lengthe huge multi million companies would go to to get mothers to bottlefeed. I dread to think bearing in my mind what they have already done in other countries including Sri Lanka. My step grandfather was head of nestles there and my grandma used to visit the women in hospital giving out free samples of formula. Sadly once the mums left hospital not only did they struggle with bf but couldnt afford the formula nor produce it in sterile conditions.

How could voluntary organisations compete with such companies?

suedonim · 12/08/2005 23:52

Info about formula issues from IBFAN and Baby Milk Action. As BMA say, they're not anti-formula, just anti-irresponsible marketing of formula.

astonished · 12/08/2005 23:38

I think Moondogs post of 7.27 explains why it is illegal, it mainly stems from agressive promotion of formula in third world countries where babies die from drinking formula and unclean water. BF rates are comparitively low in this country with other parts of Europe and if banning the advertisement of formula helps to push up the rates then i don't actually see what the problem is. If you need to use formula as i did with my DS2 after suffering PND then we all know where to get it, and if we are interested in what is in it then we can find out, so actually there is not an awful lot of need to advertise it, unless you are a cynical multi-million pound company trying to out do your rivals and make a profit. Noone here is saying formula doesn't have its place after all many of us ahve made a choise to use it in varying circumstances, but making it legal to advertise would have an adverse affect on beastfeeding rates and those undecided about their choice in feeding.

bubblerock · 12/08/2005 23:16

I don't have a problem with it being advertised on the site or anywhere else tbh, I don't understand why it is illegal to advertise or give discounts on formula (I didn't know this!!) - it's like it's something to be ashamed about!

It's down to personal choice or physical ability (I struggled with DS1 so bottle fed) and it has nothing to do with cost, after all, a 50p coupon for example isn't going to stop someone from breastfeeding (which is free).

jampots · 12/08/2005 23:07

I cant see why formula advertising is illegal anyway. |Can anyone explain why?

nutcracker · 12/08/2005 23:03

Moondog I was only ever pressurised to breastfeed not bottle feed.

JustineMumsnet · 12/08/2005 23:00

Hello everyone,
Thanks for raising this, we do take your points about formula advertising, it's not easy and it is something we've thought long and hard about. Whilst this is obviously an attempt by a formula company to promote their brand we are pretty sure mumsnetters will not be persuaded to switch to formula as a result of this campaign. Further they are offering some interesting events for mums and naturally paying mumsnet a not insignificant amount for doing it - one that really will pay the server bills for a good few months.

We did this raise the issue of advertising a while back and after a lot of input from folks we kind of came up with a policy of "we'll take their ads but not allow them to sponsor us" policy for formula companies and others who some folks, though by no means all, were wary of.

So on balance we thought it was ok host these ads but we might be wrong and we do certainly value your thoughts so keep em coming and we promise to discuss again when all the team are back from their travels (Signing off myself now for a couple of weeks now - have fun all ).

Jimjams · 12/08/2005 20:07

Well ds3 has just polished off a bottle and is now latched onto the breast drifting off to sleep. I know which I found easier. I loathe sterilising.

FairyMum · 12/08/2005 20:02

I wouldn't have minded that much if I saw the "breast is best" posters and information about breast feeding advertised next to it. Unfortunately I suppose not enough money for this side and as soon as you put one of those posters up, you are Breastapo, aren't you?

Calm down dear it's only a commercial.....

Aragon · 12/08/2005 20:01

I was so depressed when breastfeeding didn't work out for me. I lost count though of the number of times people said "don't worry - bottlefeeding's easier".

Who on earth were they trying to kid. Personally I thought bottlefeeding was a right pain in the arse - all that mucking about with bottles and sterilizers when I could have (if all had gone well) just plonked my DS on the breast and been done with it.

Nope - definitlely nothing lazy about bottlefeeding.

cod · 12/08/2005 20:00

Message withdrawn

jollymum · 12/08/2005 19:59

No offense meant or taken to anyone. Why do breastfeeding mums think bottle feeding is lazy? I wish I'd had the time to breastfeed but I had to work and juggle kids. I would have loved to have had the time/money to sit at home feeding and doing stuff but that's life.All power to those mums, it would have been nice

jollymum · 12/08/2005 19:55

Oh and while i'm here, why is it so bad t advertise formula? FGS, it's just food for babies, not bloody arsenic. Let's not advertise Calpol, 'cos it might offend all the homeopaths out there (DON'T GO THERE UNTIL YOU KNOW MY SITUATION AND JOBLet's not advertise bras in case it offend braless lladies...
FGS, look at all the people who want and need babies so much, they're probably shouting that we don't care what we feed them as long as we have been given the gift of one....{not speaking for any wannabee mums/dads etc etc PC correctness gone mad}

lunavix · 12/08/2005 19:52

jollymum - I hope you don't mean me that's not what I meant!

I meant that most breastfeeding mums see bottlefeeding as lazy, and if a parent ever chose bottlefeeding to be lazy (more fool them as it is such harder work) then I don't think advertising on the qualities breast milk and formula have will make much difference.

Sorry

jollymum · 12/08/2005 19:50

Haven't read the whole thread 'cos couldn't be arsed to get into the breast/formula debate, but someone said{and I'm not naming names) that not breatsfeeding and giving formula is "lazy". Bollocks, that's their decision, no-one knows anyone else's life and circumstances and that comment is well out of order IMHO. People have to work, live, exist and that sort of comment just fuels the stupid "Oh, well I did this and I'm so perfect etc etc" debate. Each to his own

FairyMum · 12/08/2005 19:45

Jimjams, I totally see that there are times when the best or only choice is to bottle feed. I do, however, also know that many women have such low confidence about their own ability to bf. I think if we see formuale milk advertised everywhere (and especially places like MN and places women trust to give them good information) then we will never get the bf-rate up. I just don't think feeding your baby should be commercialised. Not baby food either tbh. I have never grated a carrot for my children in my life, relying fully on processed baby food, so not on my high horse at all!

Also, I do think the principle about advertising is the same as in third world countries although not as extreme consequences. Basically women trust something which is mad by a company better than what they themselves can produce.

Jimjams · 12/08/2005 19:44

don't worry- all 3 of mine have been monsters- but my ds1 (bfed to 13 months) was the hugest of them all Skinny now. Mind you I'd rejoice for a week if he would eat a (gluten free) turkey twizzler now.

spacecadet · 12/08/2005 19:43

i havent read the site as it wont let me access it. the link doesnt work for me.

lunavix · 12/08/2005 19:42

Jimjams - I agree. I'd love to have breast fed, and I intend to breast feed future children. I had tons of support with it but it didn't work for us. However I had no advice or support about bottlefeeding, apart from 'your child will overfeed and will most likely be overweight when older'.

Jimjams · 12/08/2005 19:41

I think the assumption that everyone has an easy choice is bollocks tbh. I completely agree that bfeeding should be encouraged- but scare mongering to compare formula to turkey twizzlers is bang out of order. Yes the ingredients list is huge, yes the food is highly processed, because it has to be. Would you rather people fed their babies organic unpastuerised cows milk if they can't bfeed.

moondog · 12/08/2005 19:40

No jimjams,had enormous difficulties both times. Anyway,we are moving off the point,and you are someone that I really don't want to fall out with.

OP posts:
Jimjams · 12/08/2005 19:38

I suspect that comment comes from someone who found bfeeding easy.

Maybe I should start pureeing turkey twizzlers to add to his diet?

I always find the suggestiojn that bottlefeeders are lazy a complete joke- it's far more of a PITA if bfeeding is running smoothly.