Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Is it possible to have an 'IGNORE' feature for threads?

88 replies

Enid · 09/03/2005 08:45

I have already asked mumsnet for this and they say they have no plans but I'd be interested to see if anyone else would appreciate an 'ignore' feature - like a reverse 'watch'. If you put an 'ignore' on a thread it wouldn't appear in your active convos.

Personally I would find this helpful after the huge number of distressing threads that can get very unpleasant.

Anyone else?

OP posts:
HardcoreEnid · 09/03/2005 11:41

fuggedaboutit

don't like to talk about it anyway

mummytosteven · 09/03/2005 11:33

Sorry for my earlier comment, Enid.

Marina · 09/03/2005 11:30

Both varieties of Enid fully understand why an Ignore feature would be suitable. Feel I could use it sensibly myself so it's a yes please for me on this one

FairyMum · 09/03/2005 11:20

Yes, I'd like it. Would be nice to edit a bit more than you can at present!

HardcoreEnid · 09/03/2005 11:12

notasbraveasEnid, you should cat me as sadly we clearly have had very similar life experiences

SeaShells · 09/03/2005 11:05

I'd like to be able to 'ignore' the 'for sale' threads as it really annoys me at certain times of the day, when people who seem to be running a shop or something flood the active convos by bumping their threads for the 20th time, really annoys me, teatime everyday!
Pushes the threads off the board and then you have to go looking for them in topics.

NomDePlume · 09/03/2005 11:01

I think Enid makes a very valid point with this thread. I'd like to go back to Flossam's first point, if I may...

"But if you don't want to look at them, don't click on them?"

That is, of course, fair enough, but the fact remains that a lot of MNers (me included) then feel a level of guilt or heartlessness for avoiding the distressing threads because we know that all we can give is a few lines of comforting words that will never be enough because the problems goes much deeper and requires real professional help.

WideWebWitch · 09/03/2005 11:00

Mind you, there is a danger that we all spend all day clicking on threads I'm watching, threads I'm ignoring, 'my active conversations', discussing whether chat should be allowed or not and as a result disappear up our own bottoms for far too long to post any advice to anyone on anything

Beetroot · 09/03/2005 10:56

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

notasbraveasenid · 09/03/2005 10:39

no problem www, no offence taken .

lockets · 09/03/2005 10:39

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

WideWebWitch · 09/03/2005 10:39

sorry, notasbraveasenid, your post wasn't there when I posted, clearly your situation isn't amusing, I meant all the hand wringing is. No offence intended.

WideWebWitch · 09/03/2005 10:38

ha ha, I am finding these conversations about what mumsnet should and shouldn't have amusing today! We could be here for ever!

notasbraveasenid · 09/03/2005 10:37

I find the exercising self control thing difficult.

From childhood, I faced numerous serious suicide attempts from someone v close to me. I can't tell you how shattering it is to walk in from school and find someone in a pool of blood, having cut their wrists, or curled up in a ball, sobbing because they had tried to hang themselves from a light fitting which wasn't strong enough to support their weight.

These kind of life experiences, give some people a huge capacity for caring for, and trying to heal others. I wish that were the case for me, but it isn't. Instead, due to post traumatic stress disorder (which I manage really well most of the time), I've driven myself to threads which I know will make me ill. I cannot help - the capacity to do so was wrung out of me over the years.

I don't want to lose Mumsnet, it has been a lifeline since I discovered it a couple of years ago. My request for the "ignore" thread is v personal and selfish but, I wanted to give my reasons for it. Other reasons suggested for the facility are far more sensible than mine! I know I could go to topics and access threads that way, but I do find it unwieldy.

SeaShells · 09/03/2005 10:37

Do you not think that if a thread is locked, someone will just start a new thread in reference to that original thread so as to get their point of view across though? Causing the active convos board to become even more full of threads you don't like?

SoupDragon · 09/03/2005 10:34

My lock feature wouldn't make them unreadable so it wouldn't be as drastic as the current deletion.

WWW, the current thread deletion means you're told not to read as well as not post. Far worse. I wouldn't see it as being used flippantly, only where a thread warrents being dropped off active converstations but not deleted. And it would be reversable.

WideWebWitch · 09/03/2005 10:32

Agree, shouldn't be up to moderators to lock a thread. Should be up to mn hq.

mummytosteven · 09/03/2005 10:31

i think it would be a good idea to completely lock threads and make them unreadable in the (fortunately rare) circumstances where unpleasant personal accusations are made, i.e. that if a thread is bound to get deleted/have posts deleted, that further upset is prevented

HardcoreEnid · 09/03/2005 10:28

not up to moderator to 'lock' IMO.

But a personal 'ignore' system would work a bit like it - you could ignore upsetting threads

WideWebWitch · 09/03/2005 10:26

Ah, now, I wouldn't like a lock feature because I HATE being told not to post. I won't post if mumsnet ask me not to (but they so so rarely do, good for them) but I detest being told not to post because someone doesn't like what I have to say or the way the thread's going. Marthamoo, take your point but don't see how ignore would be any different to the watch feature really.

SoupDragon · 09/03/2005 10:22

I would like a "lock" feature where a moderator/mumsnet could lock a thread against further postings if people request it.

Sort of one step lower than deleting a thread entirely. Could be unlocked too.

HardcoreEnid · 09/03/2005 10:21

but not correct as it would be an optional feature.

Oh come on! then we could all ignore the Bras thread.

tiptop · 09/03/2005 10:20

I agree completely with marthamoo's post of 9.55am. Beautifully put!

lockets · 09/03/2005 10:09

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

HardcoreEnid · 09/03/2005 10:08

...use them to avoid things...