Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Why so much hate on MN?

614 replies

Oncetwicethreetimesmore · 21/09/2026 18:44

@MNHQ
Why so much hate on MN?
Posters hiding behind complaints about the government, presenting themselves as reasonable actors, to push hate about asylum seekers, people with disabilities, benefit claimants..Mostly the same names all day everyday.
I am told to report - MN just not interested.
I am told to hide the thread..
Why isn't moderation better?
I know this will always exist and exists on other platforms but MN makes no effort to even try to anything about it.
You can't really sell MN as a caring, supportive site with all this stuff offered on a daily basis in active.

OP posts:
runfromthecrushingtide · 25/09/2026 13:38

In the past week alone I've seen

In the past week alone I've seen:
Jewish people have an air of outraged entitlement
Jewish people are recreating the Holocaust
Israel makes me dislike Jewish people
Jewish people are doing themselves no favours
October 7th was resistance
Hamas are freedom fighters
There were no rapes on October 7th
Zionists are all terrorists who should be stranded on Epstein island
The Jews have short memories and lack empathy and compassion
People who don't criticise Israel enough are lying about being Jewish
Netenyahu is the leader of all Jewish people

Some of these posts have been deleted, some haven't.

I was going to post this on the thread about antisemitism on mumsnet but predictably it was derailed into an argument about Gaza and then deleted.

Twiglets1 · 25/09/2026 13:32

LuckyHazelFox · 25/09/2026 12:07

The I don't see Antisemitism in real life comment is still there the last time I looked.

Maybe they’ve just led a very sheltered life.

I could say I’ve never noticed racism in real life.

People would find it unbelievable but still.

Differentforgirls · 25/09/2026 13:23

teaatdawn · 25/09/2026 13:14

I’ve almost stopped posting/browsing at all, down from being a multi post per day user.
I found the recent nastiness overwhelming so have stepped back for the sake of my mental health.
I’ll occasionally pop on nowadays but the place I once knew & loved has gone.

That's me with Twitter now. Never post, rarely read.

It's easier to avoid on here but there's still a lot of bullying imo

Plus the moderation is reactive rather than proactive but that's not the mods fault. They can only deal with what's reported. and there are some very prolific reporters! Usually the worst bullies unfortunately.

teaatdawn · 25/09/2026 13:14

I’ve almost stopped posting/browsing at all, down from being a multi post per day user.
I found the recent nastiness overwhelming so have stepped back for the sake of my mental health.
I’ll occasionally pop on nowadays but the place I once knew & loved has gone.

LuckyHazelFox · 25/09/2026 12:07

Twiglets1 · 25/09/2026 12:03

Awful. That’s obviously antisemitic.

The I don't see Antisemitism in real life comment is still there the last time I looked.

Twiglets1 · 25/09/2026 12:03

Balonzee · 25/09/2026 09:50

And yet the post saying that Jewish people have this air of outraged entitlement is still up after multiple reports.

Awful. That’s obviously antisemitic.

Twiglets1 · 25/09/2026 11:50

LuckyHazelFox · 25/09/2026 07:43

The mods deleted the latest Jewish support thread then.

Yes - against guidelines apparently 🤦‍♀️

Bikenutz · 25/09/2026 11:29

I’m in agreement with the OP. Robust discussion is fine but the constant new threads about small boat crossings are tiresome and add nothing constructive to the debate.

TemperanceWest · 25/09/2026 11:27

LuckyHazelFox · 25/09/2026 11:19

It's not doing enough to tackle a few things, as I've discovered of late. Nothing I can do about it though.

Maybe stop your subscription as a protest? You can still use the free version of MN.

Not sure who would want you banned or how they'd get you banned if you post within TG.

LuckyHazelFox · 25/09/2026 11:21

BIossomtoes · 25/09/2026 11:18

Why would you be banned? I don’t understand.

Me neither.

LuckyHazelFox · 25/09/2026 11:19

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 25/09/2026 11:17

Agreed.

And it seems that you also agree with the OP and other that MNHQ is not doing enough to tackle hate and racism on the site.

It's not doing enough to tackle a few things, as I've discovered of late. Nothing I can do about it though.

BIossomtoes · 25/09/2026 11:18

LuckyHazelFox · 25/09/2026 10:54

Doesn't surprise me. I have no end of posters zooming in on my posts and making pointed remarks such as they're surprised I'm still here. They know they can't post they don't understand why I've not been banned. I see them for what they are.

Why would you be banned? I don’t understand.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 25/09/2026 11:17

LuckyHazelFox · 25/09/2026 10:55

So blatant antisemitism.

Agreed.

And it seems that you also agree with the OP and other that MNHQ is not doing enough to tackle hate and racism on the site.

LuckyHazelFox · 25/09/2026 10:55

Balonzee · 25/09/2026 09:50

And yet the post saying that Jewish people have this air of outraged entitlement is still up after multiple reports.

So blatant antisemitism.

LuckyHazelFox · 25/09/2026 10:54

Balonzee · 25/09/2026 09:50

And yet the post saying that Jewish people have this air of outraged entitlement is still up after multiple reports.

Doesn't surprise me. I have no end of posters zooming in on my posts and making pointed remarks such as they're surprised I'm still here. They know they can't post they don't understand why I've not been banned. I see them for what they are.

Balonzee · 25/09/2026 09:50

LuckyHazelFox · 25/09/2026 07:43

The mods deleted the latest Jewish support thread then.

And yet the post saying that Jewish people have this air of outraged entitlement is still up after multiple reports.

LuckyHazelFox · 25/09/2026 07:43

Twiglets1 · 25/09/2026 07:00

The mods are only inconsistent because they are human.

What looks like a personal attack to one person is just robust discussion to another. Though when posters are consistently nasty and get endless posts deleted, I do wonder why MN allows them to keep posting (financial reasons I guess).

I agree there is a lot of hate on MN but that’s online forums. In real life I find people a lot more polite and mature in debates.

The mods deleted the latest Jewish support thread then.

LuckyHazelFox · 25/09/2026 07:40

Nanechange3000 · 23/09/2026 17:49

What so i reply something unkind to an op. But tag you on that message. Even though you wasn't on the thread? If i have that right I think that could cause a planned pile on. But saying that people can just PM and alert other's anyway.

I believe that goes on as well. It's all so childish.

Twiglets1 · 25/09/2026 07:00

The mods are only inconsistent because they are human.

What looks like a personal attack to one person is just robust discussion to another. Though when posters are consistently nasty and get endless posts deleted, I do wonder why MN allows them to keep posting (financial reasons I guess).

I agree there is a lot of hate on MN but that’s online forums. In real life I find people a lot more polite and mature in debates.

myjamisbetterthanyours · 23/09/2026 19:16

pointythings · 23/09/2026 19:07

I think it depends. I'm on a long running series of threads on the Alcohol support board - it's for people who have an alcoholic in their lives. We @ each other a lot, because much of the time what we want to say is addressed to one specific poster's situation. In that context, tagging just makes sense.

If you're tagging just to have an argument it's better to not - but then again, if a poster says something particularly egregious or is spouting overt misinformation, a fair challenge should be allowed.

Yes, I suppose at the beginning of a new thread it can be appropriate, but yes, in the middle of a discussion it is annoying.

pointythings · 23/09/2026 19:07

myjamisbetterthanyours · 23/09/2026 19:01

And tagging is stupidly passive aggressive.

I think it depends. I'm on a long running series of threads on the Alcohol support board - it's for people who have an alcoholic in their lives. We @ each other a lot, because much of the time what we want to say is addressed to one specific poster's situation. In that context, tagging just makes sense.

If you're tagging just to have an argument it's better to not - but then again, if a poster says something particularly egregious or is spouting overt misinformation, a fair challenge should be allowed.

myjamisbetterthanyours · 23/09/2026 19:01

And tagging is stupidly passive aggressive.

myjamisbetterthanyours · 23/09/2026 19:00

Nanechange3000 · 23/09/2026 17:26

I have heard it referred to as mumsnet royalty. No idea if it's true though..it can feel that way though.
I used to report things thats were extremely nasty and personal and never got removed. That was a long time ago though it does seem a bit better compared to what it was.

Now.and then something would get removed. But on the other hand with some nastiness towards me I sometimes wasn't sure weather to report because it could get removed but I have already seen it so the hurt has already been caused and it gets removed and the person has what they said covered up by the removal of the post. I did often just leave it so others could see the nastiness. It felt logic at the time but probably wasn't really. Possibly made it worse because others would join in.

Just in general terms it isn't always a case of different opinions there is some real nastiness on here.

Whats a bit gutting for me is i used to get a bad time from people for how i delt with things. Now i have seen several threads with people being advised to do exactly what I was doing.

Anyway just from my point of view and my own experience.

MN royalty has nothing to do with the paid option.

I don’t think anyone uses that term anymore anyway.

It died when people started using Lighthearted in the title and using asterisks in the word cunt.

Nanechange3000 · 23/09/2026 17:49

LuckyHazelFox · 23/09/2026 17:31

Well I've learned that you can quote a poster in a derogatory way, who's not part of a conversation and it's not seen as a personal attack. So I can be posting away with somebody and choose to randomly quote another poster on MN to make a sneery point. Interesting.

What so i reply something unkind to an op. But tag you on that message. Even though you wasn't on the thread? If i have that right I think that could cause a planned pile on. But saying that people can just PM and alert other's anyway.

DuncinToffee · 23/09/2026 17:47

You had a few mentions, nothing resembling a personal attack. All is good 👍