Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Truncated posts with "show more" (NOT quoted sections)

166 replies

AromanticSpices · 08/07/2026 15:02

I've just seen this on posts - having to click "show more" if the post is longer than a handful of lines.

Please please bin this off! I want to scroll and read posts without having to constantly click!

And let's not discourage longer nuanced posts by implying they breach some (very short) length limit...

It's awful.
(NB I'm not talking about quoted sections... literally just text posted in a post)

OP posts:
StolenTeapots · 17/07/2026 10:40

Not sure why that photo didn't show

Truncated posts with "show more" (NOT quoted sections)
StolenTeapots · 17/07/2026 10:39

BridgetYourFortyDaysAreUp · 17/07/2026 09:41

Does clicking the see more button count for your click stats for showing advertisers your numbers?

I am leaning towards this, thanks @Error404FucksNotFound

Why is the show more button on this post?????

THERE IS NO MORE. Ffs this is bonkers.

StolenTeapots · 17/07/2026 10:38

@ProfessorBinturong that's it. It will be AI. You are right. They have bought in some AI consultancy company who have promised to use the site better with AI and they are causing havoc. And they won't reverse it all cos they then will have the explain to the big boss why they have wasted all the money.

BridgetYourFortyDaysAreUp · 17/07/2026 10:13

ProfessorBinturong · 17/07/2026 09:47

The post above this cuts off half way down the last line.

Did you mean mine? I can see it in full. Maybe it's different for every device? Now, THAT would be fun...🙄

SwedishEdith · 17/07/2026 10:05

Ironically, I was reading something where the link to something was just being covered up by the See more button. So I didn't.

I'm already finding I'm just scrolling past. I read too much through procrastination anyway so this may, inadvertently, be a good thing. Unintended consequences.

ProfessorBinturong · 17/07/2026 09:47

The post above this cuts off half way down the last line.

BridgetYourFortyDaysAreUp · 17/07/2026 09:41

Does clicking the see more button count for your click stats for showing advertisers your numbers?

I am leaning towards this, thanks @Error404FucksNotFound

ProfessorBinturong · 17/07/2026 08:46

McSpoot · 17/07/2026 01:10

It’s not truncated for me either.

Nor for me.

There's no consistency in how many lines are cut off, how many lines are before the cut off, or even which posts are truncated depending on who's looking at them. There's a post on one of the other threads about this that - for me - cuts off half way (vertically) through a line.

I have no idea how they coded this much chaos into the system, never mind why.

Actually, is it AI? Have they got ChatGPT to code it and not checked the results?

MyDailyCake · 17/07/2026 07:28

They're trying to be like Reddit, which is one of the least user-friendly websites there is.

likelysuspect · 17/07/2026 07:25

Mikkol · 17/07/2026 01:47

We'd had feedback that very long posts can mean a lot of scrolling, which disrupts the flow of a thread.

I just scrolled past 7 adverts, on one standard thread page on mobile, more than one of them the full page kind, and that’s not including the shopping section and the top banner, so 9 including them.

I don’t mind mumsnet needs to make money, but it’s is irritating that on a forum that’s based on user posts it’s being decided that long posts are what disrupts the flow of a thread. That’s the entire point of a forum! Posts!
You can’t with a straight face say a long post (some barely a paragraph!) is so disruptive to a forum that it needs to be hidden behind an annoying button, while having 7 adverts within the scroll of one page.

Quite right, put a 'show more' option on ads rather than showing the full lot please and stop doing it on posts where Im trying to read what someone is saying. That is the full point of a chat forum

LadyAddle · 17/07/2026 07:21

Awful - get rid of it

Augga · 17/07/2026 07:17

Melarus · 08/07/2026 15:34

Yes, I don't like it either.

I'd rather have the "show more" option on the quote box, because the quote is what most people will have already read.

This

GetAFurqingCompass · 17/07/2026 07:11

MissionCreep · 17/07/2026 00:22

Edit function has been added in recent years but ‘Edit history’ is new

Nope, it's not. Ever since the edit function was introduced it's been possible to click on the text saying "edited" and see the full edit history.

randomchap · 17/07/2026 04:33

Is this so that the long posts don't take up too much valuable advertising space? If there's a long post on screen then no space for an advert?

Mikkol · 17/07/2026 01:47

We'd had feedback that very long posts can mean a lot of scrolling, which disrupts the flow of a thread.

I just scrolled past 7 adverts, on one standard thread page on mobile, more than one of them the full page kind, and that’s not including the shopping section and the top banner, so 9 including them.

I don’t mind mumsnet needs to make money, but it’s is irritating that on a forum that’s based on user posts it’s being decided that long posts are what disrupts the flow of a thread. That’s the entire point of a forum! Posts!
You can’t with a straight face say a long post (some barely a paragraph!) is so disruptive to a forum that it needs to be hidden behind an annoying button, while having 7 adverts within the scroll of one page.

BabblingBiddy · 17/07/2026 01:20

StolenTeapots · 17/07/2026 01:01

Ffs. The irony.

That post shows in full for me! How odd

McSpoot · 17/07/2026 01:10

AnAutumnCrow · 17/07/2026 01:03

It cut off my last two lines!!

I can’t see it myself, though, when I look at my own post. How strange we have different views.

It’s not truncated for me either.

AnAutumnCrow · 17/07/2026 01:03

StolenTeapots · 17/07/2026 01:01

Ffs. The irony.

It cut off my last two lines!!

I can’t see it myself, though, when I look at my own post. How strange we have different views.

StolenTeapots · 17/07/2026 01:01

Ffs. The irony.

Truncated posts with "show more" (NOT quoted sections)
AnAutumnCrow · 17/07/2026 00:59

I agree with those who say:

a) It should be optional;

b) Truncating quotes is ok after a few lines;

c) Truncating posts including the words ‘I asked ChatGPT for you, OP and …’ is a bloody great idea, and please truncate immediately after those words.

Otherwise, make MN whole again, for the reasons explained on the thread.

Perhaps MNHQ might focus a bit more on moderating the derailing of the contributions of posters (ie content writers) who frankly should be a bit more valued within the MN business model at this financial juncture for the site.

StolenTeapots · 17/07/2026 00:56

Error404FucksNotFound · 16/07/2026 18:34

Does clicking the see more button count for your click stats for showing advertisers your numbers?

Oooh this could be it.

McSpoot · 17/07/2026 00:53

MissionCreep · 17/07/2026 00:22

Edit function has been added in recent years but ‘Edit history’ is new

No, it’s not.

StolenTeapots · 17/07/2026 00:51

You've got some contractors or something in haven't you? Management consultancy types. Telling you to change all this stuff.

It's ok we will forgive you. Just practice saying "no" to them and ride it out until their contract is up.

StolenTeapots · 17/07/2026 00:47

AmeliaPMumsnet · 16/07/2026 14:04

Hi all,

Thank you again for all your feedback on the truncation feature released last week.

We've just released it again with a change based directly on the feedback we received last week. The original cut-off point was too short, so we’ve increased it. This means posts will need to be considerably longer before they’re collapsed.

Long quoted sections will continue to be collapsed, as we hope this will make lengthy posts in quotes easier to scan and read. They can still be expanded and collapsed using ‘See more’ and ‘See less’.

We hope this change is less intrusive while keeping the benefit for particularly long posts and quotes. Please let us know how you find it.

Just TURN IT OFF. Why are you wasting time probably having 6777 meetings about this and getting your it dude to faff about? No one wants it.

Spend the money on Biscuit instead

StolenTeapots · 17/07/2026 00:44

it is awful

Get rid of it ffs