Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Ageism should be against Talk Guidelines

187 replies

Somethingbland · 30/05/2026 18:16

In the past there has been a lot of disquiet about the blatant ageism on MN.

Today I have been extremely annoyed by a blatantly and unashamedly ageist thread in AIBU about dressing " like an old lady"
I reported the thread and of course was told by MN the thread is allowed to stand because it doesn't contravene Talk guidelines.
But why doesn't it? Why does MN see ageism as perfectly acceptable? It's a total disgrace in my eyes.

I was amongst the first women who were affected by the change in retirement law and was so unable to retire at 60 as had been the norm previously. The discrimination I experienced as an older woman amongst predominantly younger staff was extremely upsetting . To be a figure of fun and contempt because of your age is no joke. And yet MN is apoarently happy to enable such views on this site

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Lippyblippy · 31/05/2026 06:29

spendyspend · 30/05/2026 18:59

Is it ageist to say you don’t want to dress like a 60 year old when you’re in your 20s?

It’s ageist to assume there is a singular way of dressing for 60 year olds. Don’t treat people as though they belong to an homogenous set, which can lead to stereotyping. Don’t assume that being in that age group means dressing is a way that’s inferior. Which bit of this do you struggle to understand? The casual ageism on mumsnet is offensive.

RedTagAlan · 31/05/2026 06:27

Difficult one. Because to quote a line from in the OP's opening post:

"The discrimination I experienced as an older woman amongst predominantly younger staff was extremely upsetting . "

Two mentions of age in that sentence. Is that not differentiating between people based on age? Yes it is.

Having read through the thread quickly, what I do not see is mention of bodies changing as we journey through life. Bulges developing where there was none before. Changes in mobility and flexibility, and how those factors might influence what people choose to wear. How there will be a statistical gradient in the styes people choose to wear.

Then throw in hormones, sex drive and mate seeking, things that are evolution driven that means any group A might style themselves different from group B,C,D etc.

And I don't think comparing ageism to other 'isms really works. Because there are many factors in the style people choose. Cultural, religious and so on. I think eventually most people will get to the point where strappy heeled sandals will be ditched in favour of more comfortable slip ons that feet can be pushed into while holding a door frame for balance.

Add it all together, and I don't think it is ageist to see different demographics in terms of what style they wear. Because in general it is true.

And now I will be accused of being ableist.

CieloElmers · 31/05/2026 05:29

tobee · 31/05/2026 01:14

Utter bollocks

Don’t get upset darl, I’ve seen it all on here

BooneyBeautiful · 31/05/2026 04:06

PoppinjayPolly · 30/05/2026 18:56

I actually don’t understand the whole waspi thing, want equality but only one way! Poor you all having to work to mid 60s… it’ll be 75 for me and my generation, if get bloody anything,other than the glow in our hearts knowing have worked for 50 years for no promised state pension, while non contributing people get it and all the gateway benefits! Yay!!

I started full-time work in 1975. Most women weren't encouraged to pay into the company pension scheme. We expected to be able to claim our state pension at the age of 60. Then it eventually got raised by a further six years with very little notice to enable us to prepare. Most of us never received a letter about this. Men of our age only saw their pension age raised by a year. How can this be fair?

abracadabra1980 · 31/05/2026 03:47

Christ. Why do people take offence at so much these days. The woman in that thread is entitled to describe her dilemma in whichever way she wishes. It is NOT offensive. Get a life, OP.

OtterlyAstounding · 31/05/2026 03:32

I think denigrating or dismissing people's opinions simply because they're older is distasteful and ageist. But as someone in my late thirties, I have said both: "This doesn't look too 'teenage' on me, does it?" and "This isn't too old lady-ish, is it?"

I'm not denigrating either - it's just a shorthand way of saying I don't want an item of clothing to make me look like I'm trying to compete with my teenage children and clutch at a desperate second youth, nor do I want clothing to age me and make me look much older than I am, more comparable to my mother's generation.

footbeds · 31/05/2026 02:17

What I absolutely hate is the assumption that older people are right wing Tory or even worse, Reform voters.

More older people did vote for Brexit but again if you acknowledge that fact it some how equals ageism

footbeds · 31/05/2026 02:14

How could MNs ban ageism? There are so many threads berating young people!

I was told it was ageist to refer to a 70 yr old as old 🙄

Oblahdeeoblahdoe · 31/05/2026 02:09

What I absolutely hate is the assumption that older people are right wing Tory or even worse, Reform voters. I've just reached 70 and a lot of my friends are 'left wing loonies' as the press liked to call us, who protested at Greenham Common.

Aussiesgettingsmashed · 31/05/2026 01:46

LadyDancealot · 30/05/2026 18:58

A check I use is to replace the word ‘old’ with, for instance, black, Muslim, Pakistani etc then see how nice and reasonable it sounds. Not quite so light-hearted then, is it? I agree, OP; often (particularly women’s) ages are given in rants e.g the old couple next door always park over my driveway - their age is irrelevant and thus is being used in a derogatory manner no other sector would accept.

Do I dress like a Muslim woman? Scroll down to picture of person in full burka.

tobee · 31/05/2026 01:20

Cornishtwine · 30/05/2026 21:59

I don't think that thread was ageist.

Fwiw I've been on Gransnet recently and they were discussing how "younger women" in leopard print were "tarty"

Swings and roundabouts

That’s equally offensive

tobee · 31/05/2026 01:16

spendyspend · 30/05/2026 19:27

It’s not ageism. It’s just a fact. I’m in my 20s and don’t want to dress like I’m 70.

You’re in your 20s? Wow you could never tell.

tobee · 31/05/2026 01:14

CieloElmers · 30/05/2026 19:24

I think the older generation on MN love moaning and sneering, about younger generations and expect everything to be like it was in “their day”

things like:
I managed to buy a house in my day, stop buying coffee and you can too
Young people who can’t find employment are lazy
We never did that with kids in my day, todays parents bla bla bla
Kids make to much noise in their own gardens
DILs are awful because they have rules about their own kids
Baby names are awful nowadays
Comments about how young girls dress

Utter bollocks

SomeGarlic · 31/05/2026 00:32

Seems like you are never too old to be insecure and seeking validation.

FFS, is that all you can see here? Nobody's said we think we look like teenagers, nobody's said we're all gorgeous, we aren't that bloody stupid or desperate.

Being aware of discrimination and negative stereotyping against your demographic is not the same as demanding compliments & pats on the head 😡 Do you accuse brown-skinned people, LGB and those with disabilities of seeking validation or is it only clever to dismiss & patronise old people?

I can't describe what a pain in the arse it is to always be in the vanguard of fighting prejudice. We started work without equal pay, continued on to win the rights & freedoms women now enjoy (and take for granted), and we're still having to battle for recognition as fully human beings - in this case, against the same women whose rights we bloody got for them!

Not validation. Basic respect.

Trackstar · 30/05/2026 23:44

SomeGarlic · 30/05/2026 23:32

@Trackstar Yeah.
So they could say it's ugly, or too loose or it's old-fashioned (all of which they probably mean). Or keep it simple with it doesn't suit your figure.

See? All clothing-specific, with no need to reference 20% of women as emblems of ugliness.

Edited

Or they could say that it looks grannyish and everyone will know what they mean. Just like some people might describe someone as dressed like a teenager or reference the mum uniform or dressed like a grandad or say someone is dressed like they are going on a cruise and everyone will know what they mean.

The question is why grannies care that younger people might think that their clothes are ugly? I thought mumsnet was full of women insisting that after the menopause they dgaf what people think of them? Seems like you are never too old to be insecure and seeking validation.

SomeGarlic · 30/05/2026 23:32

@Trackstar Yeah.
So they could say it's ugly, or too loose or it's old-fashioned (all of which they probably mean). Or keep it simple with it doesn't suit your figure.

See? All clothing-specific, with no need to reference 20% of women as emblems of ugliness.

WaitingForMojo · 30/05/2026 23:27

So should ableism and transphobia, but you know, these things bring traffic and revenue, so mn allow them.

Trackstar · 30/05/2026 23:25

SomeGarlic · 30/05/2026 23:18

It's not about differences. It's about stereotyping and denigration. Old women are assumed to all dress in a similar style, and that style is deemed ugly. Both of these judgements are insulting.

But maybe some PPs are the same ones who, on another thread, couldn't see what was wrong with a statement that black women don't swim because of their elaborate hairstyles.

Well it probably is ugly to a 20 year old. Just like the threads here about leggings or leggings with short tops or short shorts etc that 20yr olds might wear where they are deemed ugly. People have different tastes and those things tend to change as you age whether that's fashion or wine or food and people often describe things they don't like as ugly or chopped or whatever denigrating word you want to put in there.

SomeGarlic · 30/05/2026 23:18

Ipollita · 30/05/2026 22:55

Exactly. The insistence that there’s no difference between the styles worn by 20 somethings and 60 or 70 somethings is just not rooted in reality, and actually betrays a deep insecurity about being older. It’s pure denial.

It's not about differences. It's about stereotyping and denigration. Old women are assumed to all dress in a similar style, and that style is deemed ugly. Both of these judgements are insulting.

But maybe some PPs are the same ones who, on another thread, couldn't see what was wrong with a statement that black women don't swim because of their elaborate hairstyles.

Ipollita · 30/05/2026 22:55

Trackstar · 30/05/2026 22:00

They are not all the same but there are trends. If we dressed some mannequins in clothes owned by 20 year olds and clothes owned by 60 year olds chances are you would be able to tell which outfit was owned by who. I don't know why everyone has to pretend that they don't see these trends?

Exactly. The insistence that there’s no difference between the styles worn by 20 somethings and 60 or 70 somethings is just not rooted in reality, and actually betrays a deep insecurity about being older. It’s pure denial.

Anonymouseposter · 30/05/2026 22:30

ApplebyArrows · 30/05/2026 22:25

Some older people very much need to grow up.

Can you explain what you mean?

Anonymouseposter · 30/05/2026 22:29

PoppinjayPolly · 30/05/2026 18:56

I actually don’t understand the whole waspi thing, want equality but only one way! Poor you all having to work to mid 60s… it’ll be 75 for me and my generation, if get bloody anything,other than the glow in our hearts knowing have worked for 50 years for no promised state pension, while non contributing people get it and all the gateway benefits! Yay!!

On the WASPI thread there were numerous posts from women born in the first half of the 1950s saying that they didn’t agree with the WASPI campaign and that they had been informed of the changes in plenty of time.
Some posters still banged on about entitled boomers, completely ignoring that there were a variety of opinions.
It’s the generalisations that are ageist.
I don’t think the style thread is the worst example but I do notice that when relationships are discussed older women get a rough ride on here and negative assumptions are made.
There’s a lot of ageism on MN and it doesn’t get taken seriously. It’s the stereotyping that’s the issue. I haven’t noticed that many posts from older people complaining about the younger generation to be honest. I don’t go on Gransnet though.

MovedlikeHarlowinMonteCarlo · 30/05/2026 22:26

ApplebyArrows · 30/05/2026 22:25

Some older people very much need to grow up.

How so?

ApplebyArrows · 30/05/2026 22:25

Some older people very much need to grow up.

Peakypolly · 30/05/2026 22:17

Hush Puppies? I am nearly 70 and haven’t seen a pair of those for at least 30 years. Do they even still exist?
They do, and I have a beautiful pair of Hush Puppies long brown boots from a year or two back (age 37 if relevant).

Swipe left for the next trending thread