Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

FWR being trolled by a user called AidaP

513 replies

Hedgehogforshort · 08/04/2026 20:35

Hi MNHQ can you please address the issue of a certain poster called AidaP who is not participating in debate he is just trolling.

to be clear this person is a trans woman who has been convicted of violence and is posting promotion of acts of violence against women elsewhere.

in particular there is one elsewhere about using a roughly hewn rolling pin to rape women.

you realy need to look in to him it is just so not on that he is being allowed to bother us here.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
Shedmistress · 12/04/2026 09:24

SamphiretheTervosaur · 12/04/2026 09:21

I haven't been here much recently, that sort of surprises me...

People cant fund raise on here. Just FYI. It would very quickly get zapped.

SamphiretheTervosaur · 12/04/2026 09:21

hazelberry · 09/04/2026 18:05

Some on FWR were fund raising for him a few months ago.

I haven't been here much recently, that sort of surprises me...

Helleofabore · 12/04/2026 09:18

Sorry, I meant to add racial discrimination to that post above.

Helleofabore · 12/04/2026 09:10

GlovedhandsCecilia · 12/04/2026 07:19

I am wary around all white people until I know them. It doesnt mean I think Black people need safeguarding against white people. We arent inherently vulnerable to white people like youth makes you inherently vulnerable. Or many brain injuries make you inherently vulnerable.

The thing about inherently vulnerability is that the other person doesn't even have to mean to exploit you for you to be exploited. That is what makes you so vulnerable when you are young or have some forms of cognitive impairment.

Like Black people, women become vulnerable because people who arent white (or women) choose to be discriminatory. It isn't inherent for white people to be racist and it isn't inherent for men to exploit women. Neither group is inherently vulnerable.

And yet, people are safeguarded against discrimination with law and policy.

Again just because you reject the provisions being labelled as safeguarding doesn’t mean that the provisions are not based on safeguarding principles.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 12/04/2026 07:26

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 11/04/2026 21:55

Spotting and commenting on someone's "I'm alright Jack" stance is a "personal attack" now?

As for "troll hunting", if someone upthread hadn't posted the results of Advanced Searching a certain poster, that poster's blatant self-contradictions would remain unknown to the other posters on this thread. As it happens, that poster has since gone very very quiet. I cannot possibly think why 🤥

Because I went to spend time with my family and sleep.... its 726 on a Sunday.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 12/04/2026 07:25

Hedgehogforshort · 11/04/2026 16:24

Yawn

Exactly. They aren't here to genuinely share views with other women or even debate. That's boring. Theyre here to bully anyone who disagrees with them. That is fun..

GlovedhandsCecilia · 12/04/2026 07:24

Hedgehogforshort · 11/04/2026 14:25

I am not going to criticise people for robust challenges, to posters who seem to be here for no other reason than to have an argument.

Or call their comments as snide etc, either.

"You are a man" isnt a robust challenge.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 12/04/2026 07:23

BunfightBetty · 11/04/2026 11:57

Well that sounds like you’re just here to broadcast. Why would anybody bother to listen?

What’s the relevance of your communications with black people, rather than all people?

What’s appropriate or inappropriate about how people respond to you, in your view?

Its to show that a group of peolle can have diverse but equally passionate views on a subject without any of them resulting to personal insults and doubts about the Blackness of any of the people with opposing opinions.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 12/04/2026 07:21

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 11/04/2026 10:02

I reply to posts as I scroll down the thread. That's why you get none from me for ages, whilst I do other things, and then several at once when I read Mumsnet.

Who made you the police of how to use Mumsnet?

Edited

I make me the police of how I use mumsnet. You can reply to me, but if I come back to more than 10 notifications, I delete them.all. I just returned to 6, so I will respond to them.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 12/04/2026 07:20

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 11/04/2026 09:56

If you had been raped, you'd know why women are vulnerable to men.

You are familiar with "if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck". If you post like someone who has breezed through life without ever facing male violence, then I will infer, not assume, that you have never faced male violence.

You clearly don't have a rebuttal for any of my points about why women are vulnerable compared to men, because you've resorted to manufactured outrage and personal attacks.

Does it occur to you that one's reaction to make violence may not mirror yours?

GlovedhandsCecilia · 12/04/2026 07:19

BIWI · 11/04/2026 09:43

So on the one hand @GlovedhandsCecilia you say:

Nope because women don't inherently need safeguarding and I dont support that likd of archaic misogyny.

And yet, AS shows you saying this on another thread:

As a woman, I pretty much assume most strange men are dangerous because men cause so.much harm. It isn't even most men but it is enough men to make me wary of all men. I am also aware that society excuses this behaviour in men so they get away with it.

So you're just here to argue the toss, aren't you?

If you are going to argue, at least have the courtesy to read what other posters have written in reply to your arguments!

I am wary around all white people until I know them. It doesnt mean I think Black people need safeguarding against white people. We arent inherently vulnerable to white people like youth makes you inherently vulnerable. Or many brain injuries make you inherently vulnerable.

The thing about inherently vulnerability is that the other person doesn't even have to mean to exploit you for you to be exploited. That is what makes you so vulnerable when you are young or have some forms of cognitive impairment.

Like Black people, women become vulnerable because people who arent white (or women) choose to be discriminatory. It isn't inherent for white people to be racist and it isn't inherent for men to exploit women. Neither group is inherently vulnerable.

GlovedhandsCecilia · 12/04/2026 07:11

SirChenjins · 11/04/2026 09:40

You seem to be very selective in which posts you ignore from the same posters. Funny that.

So tell me - these white people that make you unsafe. Does that include white men?

Edited

Yes, of course

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 11/04/2026 21:55

Bagsintheboot · 11/04/2026 14:18

Agreed - surely it is possible to discuss without resorting to troll hunting, personal attacks, accusations of lying, or snide / sarcastic comments and insinuations about other posters?

Spotting and commenting on someone's "I'm alright Jack" stance is a "personal attack" now?

As for "troll hunting", if someone upthread hadn't posted the results of Advanced Searching a certain poster, that poster's blatant self-contradictions would remain unknown to the other posters on this thread. As it happens, that poster has since gone very very quiet. I cannot possibly think why 🤥

Hedgehogforshort · 11/04/2026 16:24

Yawn

OP posts:
Bagsintheboot · 11/04/2026 16:16

Hedgehogforshort · 11/04/2026 14:25

I am not going to criticise people for robust challenges, to posters who seem to be here for no other reason than to have an argument.

Or call their comments as snide etc, either.

Robust =/= snide. You can challenge robustly without sniping or having a dig.

Hedgehogforshort · 11/04/2026 14:25

Bagsintheboot · 11/04/2026 14:18

Agreed - surely it is possible to discuss without resorting to troll hunting, personal attacks, accusations of lying, or snide / sarcastic comments and insinuations about other posters?

I am not going to criticise people for robust challenges, to posters who seem to be here for no other reason than to have an argument.

Or call their comments as snide etc, either.

OP posts:
Bagsintheboot · 11/04/2026 14:18

Hedgehogforshort · 11/04/2026 09:41

I do think sometimes we should refrain from posting certain thoughts about a persons personal experience or lack of regarding sexual violence, and i am going to ignore the inference that all white people are racist.

I would rather this thread is not deleted.

Agreed - surely it is possible to discuss without resorting to troll hunting, personal attacks, accusations of lying, or snide / sarcastic comments and insinuations about other posters?

BunfightBetty · 11/04/2026 11:57

GlovedhandsCecilia · 11/04/2026 10:58

Ive literally never said that!

I post to share my views. I'm not all that interested in peoples views on my views. Especially 16 separate views of my views. And especially where it descended into "you're a man" "you hate women" etc etc. I have.. actually nobody in my life plays those games.

I communicate with a diverse group of Black people with a wide variety of opposing opinions and views. That's just not how we operate, even on topics we all feel extremely passionate about. If you all learn to communicate appropriately, then maybe I'll take more time to read more of the posts

Well that sounds like you’re just here to broadcast. Why would anybody bother to listen?

What’s the relevance of your communications with black people, rather than all people?

What’s appropriate or inappropriate about how people respond to you, in your view?

Shedmistress · 11/04/2026 11:41

Does anyone remember that man who said he was a disabled woman who was outraged about one single post on here..and who went on to post about it and threaten to sue and then that's when the whole 'report those women if you feel unsafe to us on twitter even if you aren't a MN user'...which is how the guidelines came to be readjusted for this board only?

I have no idea why I have been reminded of that this morning.

SirChenjins · 11/04/2026 11:37

BIWI · 11/04/2026 11:34

And I think the attempt to bring race into the argument is invidious.

Yes I noticed that - and not for the first time.

BIWI · 11/04/2026 11:34

And I think the attempt to bring race into the argument is invidious.

ErrolTheDragon · 11/04/2026 11:34

Just not going to interact where it doesnt seem worthwhile.

👍🏻
let’s all do that

BIWI · 11/04/2026 11:30

If you all learn to communicate appropriately, then maybe I'll take more time to read more of the posts

This is risible. As well as ignorant.

NoWordForFluffy · 11/04/2026 11:27

SirChenjins · 11/04/2026 11:25

It really is.

It's just a well worn tactic to 'prove' to MNHQ how upset you are and why posts should be deleted when you report them, IME.

SirChenjins · 11/04/2026 11:25

NoWordForFluffy · 11/04/2026 11:01

The faux outrage is laughable really.

It really is.