Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Laugh reaction

187 replies

Itsjustsodepressing · 28/04/2025 16:12

I know when MN introduced the reaction button which included the Laugh emoji a lot of posters weren't happy about it. And there have been various comments by posters about its misuse.

It is just being used so commonly now to mock and deride serious comments that are in no way funny. That can no way be interpreted as light hearted.

It would appear to be being used to try and drive posters off threads. And the impression I get is that it's actually often certain posters ganging up together to try and silence people who don't agree with them.

I think MN having guidelines for posters to stick to civilised responses to other posters is being undermined because they have given those who are minded to be unpleasant to other posters the perfect tool to be nasty to them without having to verbalise anything and risk getting their post removed.

I'm failing to see any benefit in providing the laugh emoji reaction when it's principal use now is to upset and drive away genuine posters.

I don't think it was a good idea in the first place and I would like to see MN remove this reaction option.

OP posts:
CarpetKnees · 29/04/2025 23:02

Itsjustsodepressing · 29/04/2025 19:47

Well I know that some posters are "friends" with each other and communicate - by the private message facility on MN. And possibly by other means.
This was news to me until a wee while ago someone came onto a thread and started getting stuck into a poster because of some reply/ comments she perceived as an attack on some one else on the thread. And she actually said that the poster she had leapt to the defence of had been supportive of her some time back when she was going through a bad time and since then they had been friends and kept in touch with each other.

And this to me explained why, if you happen to disagree on a thread with one poster you sometimes get others coming on to gang on up on you with an aggressiveness that is totally out of proportion. I've noticed this particularly on the Chat forum

This is making you sound paranoid now.

Are you seriously suggesting there are gangs of friends on MN, who message each other to tell them to laugh at a post, even though no-one can see the response except the person that posted it ? Hmm

AlteredStater · 29/04/2025 21:06

There has been a thread disliking the laugh emoji a little while back and so you're definitely not the only one OP.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/site_stuff/5234727-get-rid-of-the-laugh-reaction

Zonder · 29/04/2025 20:29

I think a shocked face or a no / shaking head face would be useful. Then people can show disagreement without mocking.

Itsjustsodepressing · 29/04/2025 20:27

LindorDoubleChoc · 29/04/2025 20:17

"someone came onto a thread and started getting stuck into a poster because of some reply/ comments she perceived as an attack on some one else on the thread. And she actually said that the poster she had leapt to the defence of had been supportive of her some time back when she was going through a bad time and since then they had been friends and kept in touch with each other."

Is this the crux of your argument OP? You were on a thread once and poster X revealed they were friends with poster Y off board.

?

How does this translate to the laugh reaction button being used inappropriately across the boards?

.
I posted this in explanation of something I'd said which @CarpetKnees
was querying.

The point of my thread is the misuse of the laugh emoji to mock and deride other posters. As I'm sure you are aware.

OP posts:
LindorDoubleChoc · 29/04/2025 20:17

"someone came onto a thread and started getting stuck into a poster because of some reply/ comments she perceived as an attack on some one else on the thread. And she actually said that the poster she had leapt to the defence of had been supportive of her some time back when she was going through a bad time and since then they had been friends and kept in touch with each other."

Is this the crux of your argument OP? You were on a thread once and poster X revealed they were friends with poster Y off board.

?

How does this translate to the laugh reaction button being used inappropriately across the boards?

Itsjustsodepressing · 29/04/2025 19:47

CarpetKnees · 29/04/2025 17:52

It would appear to be being used to try and drive posters off threads. And the impression I get is that it's actually often certain posters ganging up together to try and silence people who don't agree with them.

How have you jumped to this conclusion, when no-one can see the responses except the person who made the post that is being responded to ? Confused

Well I know that some posters are "friends" with each other and communicate - by the private message facility on MN. And possibly by other means.
This was news to me until a wee while ago someone came onto a thread and started getting stuck into a poster because of some reply/ comments she perceived as an attack on some one else on the thread. And she actually said that the poster she had leapt to the defence of had been supportive of her some time back when she was going through a bad time and since then they had been friends and kept in touch with each other.

And this to me explained why, if you happen to disagree on a thread with one poster you sometimes get others coming on to gang on up on you with an aggressiveness that is totally out of proportion. I've noticed this particularly on the Chat forum

OP posts:
CarpetKnees · 29/04/2025 17:52

It would appear to be being used to try and drive posters off threads. And the impression I get is that it's actually often certain posters ganging up together to try and silence people who don't agree with them.

How have you jumped to this conclusion, when no-one can see the responses except the person who made the post that is being responded to ? Confused

LindorDoubleChoc · 29/04/2025 17:30

OP - how do you know that people are ganging up and posting laugh emoji reactions all over Mumsnet inappropriately? I genuinely don't understand as I thought they weren't visible to anyone but the individual poster?

If you have noticed certain posters doing this systematically and repeatedly to you in a bullying way, then you can report them to HQ. I don't understand this thread at all.

I hardly ever get any reactions, I feel I must be exceptionally dull Grin.

IfYouPutASausageInItItsNotAViennetta · 29/04/2025 17:15

SirChenjins · 29/04/2025 16:45

It's very easy to say don't let it affect your day - but when you're really upset about something and you're looking for help and support at a very vulnerable point in your life then the last thing you need is someone reacting to your post with a laughter emoji that no-one else but you can see. It was suggested on a previous thread that the obvious thing to do would be to remove the function from certain threads, but MN didn't want to do that.

Yes, this completely. You never know how vulnerable somebody may be.

It's a bit like when an OP writes something like "I've just found out that my husband has been having an affair for 5 years. We have three children under 8 and I'm pregnant. I confronted him and he told me to pack my bags and leave. The house is in his name only and I've nowhere for us to go. I'm absolutely in peaces" - then some 100% weapons-grade nob comes straight on to point out the word error, as though that's the most/only important thing.

Except it's even worse, because at least if they post a nasty, boorish response on the thread, at least others can see it too and tear into them reciprocably to defend OP and help her to see that she very much isn't the unreasonable one.

SirChenjins · 29/04/2025 16:45

It's very easy to say don't let it affect your day - but when you're really upset about something and you're looking for help and support at a very vulnerable point in your life then the last thing you need is someone reacting to your post with a laughter emoji that no-one else but you can see. It was suggested on a previous thread that the obvious thing to do would be to remove the function from certain threads, but MN didn't want to do that.

IfYouPutASausageInItItsNotAViennetta · 29/04/2025 16:42

Rememberthis81 · 29/04/2025 15:15

No

I think your post was utterly OTT as seems to equate a private laughing emoji response to a post they deem ridiculous …. As akin to an intrinsic and profound and very grave moral failing

I think we'll just have to disagree.

People are free to conduct themselves in their interactions with others however they wish - and they may just be having a bad day, or that might just be how they always are and it makes them very happy; but I personally think that the online equivalent of wordlessly sneering in somebody's face, like a school bully, is neither a kind nor mature thing to do.

Rememberthis81 · 29/04/2025 15:30

Goody2ShoesAndTheFilthyBeast · 29/04/2025 15:27

I know. But you can't let it get to you.

I am no angel. I know I have been a cow from time to time on here and have, rightly, been told to wind my fucking neck in.

All I can say is it's not worth your time getting upset with strangers over this shit. They pressed a laugh emoji. Leave them to it. Don't let it affect your day.

I like this post

Goody2ShoesAndTheFilthyBeast · 29/04/2025 15:27

Itsjustsodepressing · 29/04/2025 10:11

You see this is one of the most upsetting things about it to me: that some posters spread a bit of random nastiness to total strangers for no reason and then just get on with their lives.

Just why? If it means nothing to them what is the point?

It's just adds to the drip, drip, drip of unpleasantness that a lot of us see and experience everyday in our lives.

I know. But you can't let it get to you.

I am no angel. I know I have been a cow from time to time on here and have, rightly, been told to wind my fucking neck in.

All I can say is it's not worth your time getting upset with strangers over this shit. They pressed a laugh emoji. Leave them to it. Don't let it affect your day.

Rememberthis81 · 29/04/2025 15:15

IfYouPutASausageInItItsNotAViennetta · 29/04/2025 15:09

You think that everybody is either a generally kind, fair, considerate person or a murderer - with nobody whatsoever in between?

No

I think your post was utterly OTT as seems to equate a private laughing emoji response to a post they deem ridiculous …. As akin to an intrinsic and profound and very grave moral failing

IfYouPutASausageInItItsNotAViennetta · 29/04/2025 15:09

Rememberthis81 · 29/04/2025 14:35

We are talking about someone using the laugh emoji to make the point they think a poster’s post is daft?

and not… murder?

You think that everybody is either a generally kind, fair, considerate person or a murderer - with nobody whatsoever in between?

FTWIWTGO · 29/04/2025 14:59

I agre it can be quite jarring to receive the laughing emoji on something painful.
People can be quite nasty on here. I try not to take it personally though and just pity them. They are the schoolyard bullies who haven’t grown up.

Rememberthis81 · 29/04/2025 14:51

HollidayRanger · 29/04/2025 14:50

But no one else can see the reactions can they? I just get an email that I ignore.

And you can even turn that off

Rememberthis81 · 29/04/2025 14:50

SirChenjins · 29/04/2025 14:50

No, it’s being used by some posters to mock someone who’s already having a really rough time of it. No need for it. At least they could be called out for their dickish response in the days before the laughter emoji.

I thought the op was about laughing emojis to posters comments?
i have just read and indeed the op refers to her own post to an op getting one

SirChenjins · 29/04/2025 14:50

Rememberthis81 · 29/04/2025 14:35

We are talking about someone using the laugh emoji to make the point they think a poster’s post is daft?

and not… murder?

No, it’s being used by some posters to mock someone who’s already having a really rough time of it. No need for it. At least they could be called out for their dickish response in the days before the laughter emoji.

HollidayRanger · 29/04/2025 14:50

But no one else can see the reactions can they? I just get an email that I ignore.

Rememberthis81 · 29/04/2025 14:35

IfYouPutASausageInItItsNotAViennetta · 29/04/2025 13:38

The nasty people's worst punishment comes with living with the person they've chosen to be.

How could you ever be truly happy when your emotions are consumed with hatred and bitterness?

At least the rest of us can experience an unpleasant moment and then move on; for those who are this way, they can't or won't ever escape it.

We are talking about someone using the laugh emoji to make the point they think a poster’s post is daft?

and not… murder?

IfYouPutASausageInItItsNotAViennetta · 29/04/2025 13:38

The nasty people's worst punishment comes with living with the person they've chosen to be.

How could you ever be truly happy when your emotions are consumed with hatred and bitterness?

At least the rest of us can experience an unpleasant moment and then move on; for those who are this way, they can't or won't ever escape it.

Itsjustsodepressing · 29/04/2025 10:11

Goody2ShoesAndTheFilthyBeast · 28/04/2025 20:26

Tbh, they probably clicked then moved on and never thought about it again. If you let it get to you then you are giving some random more head space than they've any right to have.

I know it's easier said than done but if you can, roll your eyes and forget about them.

You see this is one of the most upsetting things about it to me: that some posters spread a bit of random nastiness to total strangers for no reason and then just get on with their lives.

Just why? If it means nothing to them what is the point?

It's just adds to the drip, drip, drip of unpleasantness that a lot of us see and experience everyday in our lives.

OP posts:
AlteredStater · 28/04/2025 21:15

Allthegoodnamesarechosen · 28/04/2025 17:38

Turn the other cheek ( and consider that God will have the last laugh).

That's not the point, though.

Goody2ShoesAndTheFilthyBeast · 28/04/2025 20:26

Itsjustsodepressing · 28/04/2025 17:54

Yes I have done this.

In fact I have indirectly done that on this thread.

But they don't usually reply.

Tbh, they probably clicked then moved on and never thought about it again. If you let it get to you then you are giving some random more head space than they've any right to have.

I know it's easier said than done but if you can, roll your eyes and forget about them.