Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Original poster

The misogynistic and ageist slur ‘karen’

91 replies

Cursory · 20/04/2025 20:51

I see this cropping up on here on a reasonably regular basis. It’s an acknowledged ageist and misogynistic term for women over a certain age with an opinion.

Will MNHQ moderate it accordingly if it’s reported, the same way you do for other derogatory terms?

OP posts:
StarDolphins · 20/04/2025 21:39

I actually didn’t know what this means although I should because pretty much ALL the kids at school say it. Apparently’Karen is privileged, entitled and complains a lot!

it doesn’t bother me as I think it’s just a bandwagon type thing. I get far more worked up at other stuff.

brettsalanger · 20/04/2025 21:34

Smallmercies · 20/04/2025 21:23

It's no more misogynistic than gammon is racist. Karen is an attitude, not an attribute. I will continue to use it with pride.

I agree. It’s only on MN where you get pounced on for saying it.

even my Aunt, called Karen, uses it.

theunbreakablecleopatrajones · 20/04/2025 21:32

GeorgianaM · 20/04/2025 21:25

Same here. It's not aimed at all women it's aimed at those with a certain look and a bad attitude.

Show quote history

👆

theunbreakablecleopatrajones · 20/04/2025 21:31

Smallmercies · 20/04/2025 21:23

It's no more misogynistic than gammon is racist. Karen is an attitude, not an attribute. I will continue to use it with pride.

Um, well it is because there is no male equivalent and the term isn’t used for men

Whenindoubthugitout · 20/04/2025 21:31

Sorry I have misread

Whenindoubthugitout · 20/04/2025 21:30

Smallmercies · 20/04/2025 21:29

Eh?

Show quote history

Boomer
what attributes does a “boomer” hold that are not age related?

Smallmercies · 20/04/2025 21:29

Whenindoubthugitout · 20/04/2025 21:28

What attributes does is it hold?

Show quote history

Eh?

Whenindoubthugitout · 20/04/2025 21:28

Smallmercies · 20/04/2025 21:26

Boomer isn't ageist - again, it describes an attitude, not an attribute.

Show quote history

What attributes does is it hold?

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 20/04/2025 21:27

GeorgianaM · 20/04/2025 21:25

Same here. It's not aimed at all women it's aimed at those with a certain look and a bad attitude.

Show quote history

Certain look?
is it ok to target women because of their looks?

Smallmercies · 20/04/2025 21:26

Whenindoubthugitout · 20/04/2025 21:25

Ffs
honestly
obvs not named Karen.

it’s as misogynistic as Boomer is ageist.

Show quote history

Boomer isn't ageist - again, it describes an attitude, not an attribute.

GeorgianaM · 20/04/2025 21:25

Smallmercies · 20/04/2025 21:23

It's no more misogynistic than gammon is racist. Karen is an attitude, not an attribute. I will continue to use it with pride.

Same here. It's not aimed at all women it's aimed at those with a certain look and a bad attitude.

Whenindoubthugitout · 20/04/2025 21:25

Smallmercies · 20/04/2025 21:23

It's no more misogynistic than gammon is racist. Karen is an attitude, not an attribute. I will continue to use it with pride.

Ffs
honestly
obvs not named Karen.

it’s as misogynistic as Boomer is ageist.

Smallmercies · 20/04/2025 21:23

It's no more misogynistic than gammon is racist. Karen is an attitude, not an attribute. I will continue to use it with pride.

Balhammom · 20/04/2025 21:21

You may not like it, but that does not mean it’s misogynistic. Not every insult directed at a woman is inherently misogynistic.

WinterMorn · 20/04/2025 21:18

I regularly tackle this on my local FB group. I then get jumped on for doing so by other women!

Nameftgigb · 20/04/2025 20:53

They generally do. Usually the entire of mn will jump on anyone who dares to say it