Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Thread Deleted ( Parts 1,2,3, and 4)

284 replies

AnneKipankitoo · 05/03/2025 11:18

I saw that thread 4 was deleted with the message
about breaking Mumsnet guidelines.
The 3 previous threads were deleted too.

Which guidelines were broken?

OP posts:
treesandsun · 05/03/2025 14:20

WilmaTitsDrop · 05/03/2025 11:40

Normally that sort of generic message means a PBP.

Or MNHQ have done a bit of digging into their previous posts and found glaring inconsistencies.

Annoying when they don't say though.

What does PBP mean?

Bruisername · 05/03/2025 14:19

The football stuff was potentially comedy gold though. Surely there’s a sitcom waiting for this character who takes their footie so seriously and makes up stuff about drug tests and transfer windows

there was only so long op could hold the naive act really

BunnyLake · 05/03/2025 14:17

TheMorels · 05/03/2025 13:51

😂😂

Honestly, some MNers are so very gullible. It was so obviously utter claptrap from the outset. Much like one that went on interminably a while ago in a similar vein, over several threads.

I haven’t fine tuned my bs radar enough on MN, still learning, but something just didn't sit right with the mil saying ‘Darling, in my day’. Her day being circa the 1980s but sounded more like she was from the 1880s. I was beginning to picture Maggie Smith. Also by the end of it his initial bad behaviour seemed tame to the absolute douchebag he was developing into, then adding an even worse character in the mix in the shape of the football manager, I mean even the most trusting person must have been getting doubts. I believed them to start with because it wouldn’t occur to me that someone would waste their time with fictional nonsense🤷‍♀️

I mean you couldn’t make it up, except apparently they did.

Americano75 · 05/03/2025 14:15

I'd started to eventually suspect it was bullshit on thread 4. Sad bastards making shit up for clicks.

Frootnvej · 05/03/2025 14:05

WilmaTitsDrop · 05/03/2025 13:00

At the risk of emphasising my duff-ness, can anyone tell me why someone would put so much time, effort and mental energy into running a post about an entirely fake scenario? I mean, I just can't even begin to fathom out what someone would achieve by doing this?

It could be anything from mental illness to loneliness 🤷‍♂️

It's been happening ever since chat forums were invented.

If you've ever watched that awful programme called Catfish, the OP will have similar traits to the type who put similar amounts of energy and time into Catfishing. They're societally rejected or lacking in some way, but find power, kicks and immense control holding court virtually. It's a mental illness. Basically the type who make the worst psycho exes.

handsdownthebest · 05/03/2025 14:03

FuckoffeeBeforeCoffee · 05/03/2025 11:22

Oh my god. Was it all bullshit??

I though it was...

INeedAnotherName · 05/03/2025 14:01

AnneKipankitoo · 05/03/2025 13:56

Oh I just assumed the first two went to 1000 posts .

Same here.

That poster stating the threads only got to 20 pages isn't actually being that helpful since my settings are 100 posts to a page which means I can only get to 10 pages maximum. Saying the post count would be better for everyone.

AnneKipankitoo · 05/03/2025 13:56

SuperTrooper14 · 05/03/2025 13:40

That's the point though – the OP never let the threads fill up. Threads 1 and 2 only got to page 20 before the OP started a new one, presumably because they knew a shiny new thread carrying the "drama" on would prompt more engagement.

Oh I just assumed the first two went to 1000 posts .

OP posts:
Notsosure1 · 05/03/2025 13:55

Doggymummar · 05/03/2025 13:52

From ten years ago! Wow you have a great memory 😊

lol I actually googled what PBP was on mumsnet and this came straight up - weirdly similar story! 👀

Reetpetitenot · 05/03/2025 13:53

It was so obviously bullshit.

Doggymummar · 05/03/2025 13:52

From ten years ago! Wow you have a great memory 😊

TheMorels · 05/03/2025 13:51

BunnyLake · 05/03/2025 13:35

I did start wondering once the mil came on the scene. She sounded like a character out of Downton Abbey.

😂😂

Honestly, some MNers are so very gullible. It was so obviously utter claptrap from the outset. Much like one that went on interminably a while ago in a similar vein, over several threads.

Treesandsheepeverywhere · 05/03/2025 13:49

Goody2ShoesAndTheFilthyBeast · 05/03/2025 13:39

Is that the one who was setting up a new thread before the old one was full?

That's usually a decent clue.

Precisely! I wondered how she was getting time to actually address the situation as she was fully committed to the threads.
Sad really.

Bingbopboomboomboombopbam · 05/03/2025 13:49

Wanting attention from random online people is sad tho, whoever OP is I hope they found something better to do

Bruisername · 05/03/2025 13:45

Do people get that invested? I reported the thread because it looked dodgy but MNHQ said they couldn’t see a problem. I then engaged on the basis it was probably nonsense but it’s a bit of entertainment

unless it’s a thread that needs facts (eg politics) then I assume it may be all fake drama

WilmaTitsDrop · 05/03/2025 13:41

anothermnuser123 · 05/03/2025 13:18

It was so clear, the way it constantly escalated and the OP kept saying but should I stay while the supposed behaviour escalated.

I reported it to MN and said it wasn't even hidden with how obviously fake it was but they clearly left it up for the clicks, which I even suggested in my report. It's clear they won't remove even an obviously fake thread if its driving traffic.

People asked why people care if its fake but some posters invested hours into giving advice, a couple in particular were very vocal on the threads and I felt bad they wasted so much time on what was clearly utter rubbish.

People asked why people care if its fake but some posters invested hours into giving advice, a couple in particular were very vocal on the threads and I felt bad they wasted so much time on what was clearly utter rubbish.

Never feel bad.

Those posters will have had time to waste, just like all of us when we log into a chat forum.

And of course they know there's always a chance the person they're posting to might not be genuine 🤷‍♂️

SuperTrooper14 · 05/03/2025 13:40

AnneKipankitoo · 05/03/2025 13:21

I did not see that one. I looked at the messages for 3 and 4.
Still, I think letting it go to 4 full threads… but as someone said that is a lot of attention and footfall.

That's the point though – the OP never let the threads fill up. Threads 1 and 2 only got to page 20 before the OP started a new one, presumably because they knew a shiny new thread carrying the "drama" on would prompt more engagement.

AllTheTreesOfTheField · 05/03/2025 13:39

BUUUUUT maybe the threads, with the many helpful posters, helped real women with lying, cheating dickhead husbands/partners think more clearly about their lives.

Goody2ShoesAndTheFilthyBeast · 05/03/2025 13:39

Is that the one who was setting up a new thread before the old one was full?

That's usually a decent clue.

Petuniaspetal · 05/03/2025 13:39

I think I 'unwatched' it half way through the first installment. Thank god I didn't get too invested and waste my time.
I find when you have 50 or 60 people advising you what to do/what not to do, it all gets a bit mad.

BunnyLake · 05/03/2025 13:35

I did start wondering once the mil came on the scene. She sounded like a character out of Downton Abbey.

UnctuousUnicorns · 05/03/2025 13:30

lalafox · 05/03/2025 11:35

Surely not!! I read the whole 4 threads!!! Who even has time to make this shit up and carry it on for so long

Yep, multiple part soap opera style threads usually draw a 🙄 from me too.

dickiedavisthunderthighs · 05/03/2025 13:27

I think it probably had a modicum of truth at the beginning, maybe the first few posts. OP then gets more attention than she's ever gets in real life, and it goes from there.
As with all of these things it was baffling how it got as far as it did.

RainbowZebraWarrior · 05/03/2025 13:25

YourIcyReader · 05/03/2025 12:15

I’m surprised it lasted as long as it did, it was so obviously nonsense.

Totally. I was stunned when I saw 'she' had a 4th thread. The last post I read on it was from someone telling her she was enjoying the attention. I'll say! What was it? 4 threads in the space of a week?

whatapalarva · 05/03/2025 13:24

That has made my mind up not to invest any more time with MN now.