Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Another thread on 'active' being destroyed

114 replies

saraclara · 26/01/2025 22:06

A parent who posted about her children in care, on the fostering branch, is being ripped apart, unfairly.

This is only happening because her thread appears on active/trending/whatever, so people who have no idea about anything are abusing and judging her.

I've reported some posts, but what really needs to happen in these circumstances, is HQ quickly removing the thread title from active. Some particular branches' OPs need this kind of protection.

Can you please consider this?

OP posts:
wandawaves · 26/01/2025 23:38

I was just reading that thread and thought it was horrendous.
But... if it's removed from active, will it be seen enough to get responses? I guess it depends on how people use the site, but personally I only use the 'active' button, i don't go into individual forums.

Tiredofallthis101 · 26/01/2025 23:35

👏

Peeeet · 26/01/2025 23:35

There’s a special type of absolute loser who gets off on kicking people when they’re down, and mumsnet is full of them. Embarrasing people.

RawBloomers · 26/01/2025 23:33

I think the issue with some posters going out of there way to attack the OP is an issue with more active topics too, but very much agree that threads in sensitive topics should not automatically go into active posts. It really does invite in the nasties.

Lostcat · 26/01/2025 23:32

They need to learn to use the moderation tools that are built into the software to prevent banned posters from simply making new accounts

tbf they do do this

BlazenWeights · 26/01/2025 23:30

I think people forget that it’s real humans who are also on the internet and so speak without care not necessarily with active ill will but throwaway. Comments like it’s a tabloid or just gossipy stuff. I’ve read that thread and I was about to start jumping in defence of the Mum but decided against escalating stuff. It’s also possible that the algorithm put it out there for traffic? I dunno just guessing but that’s the kind of topic that gets people involved.

ThatEllie · 26/01/2025 23:28

What needs to happen is that moderators need to permanently ban people that post vile shit like that. They need to learn to use the moderation tools that are built into the software to prevent banned posters from simply making new accounts. They need to be taught how to see where accounts first accessed Mumsnet from so they can see if the first access was a link from a gossip forum where people harass and attack others. Traffic originating from those sources is unlikely to ever be anything but a problem on a site like this. It is fine for women that are self-professed shut-ins that have never been in relationships to want to interact with other women here. It is not fine for them to tear into others regarding their relationships or children when they have no experience whatsoever of either of them.

But alas, I suspect that the owners of MN care only about ad revenue and will never bother to clean up the cesspit.

BySunnyAquaPanda · 26/01/2025 23:28

saraclara · 26/01/2025 22:06

A parent who posted about her children in care, on the fostering branch, is being ripped apart, unfairly.

This is only happening because her thread appears on active/trending/whatever, so people who have no idea about anything are abusing and judging her.

I've reported some posts, but what really needs to happen in these circumstances, is HQ quickly removing the thread title from active. Some particular branches' OPs need this kind of protection.

Can you please consider this?

She is doing exactly what is right for her children - making sure they are attending extra curricular activities and that her money isn't being wasted. No idea why she was getting torn apart

Typical mn

Tentententhen · 26/01/2025 23:22

AnnaL94 · 26/01/2025 23:17

But surely that shouldn’t give people the right to be nasty bullies?

No not at all, but a woman who is on police bail and has had her kids removed is probably the modern equivalent of passing a stock in medieval times and having a pail of rotten veg. People remember user names and peoples stories and I would say the first rule of mumsnet is don’t post on AIBU, I do agree trending is very harmful and should be more carefully curated…however I suspect the mumsnet algorithms are not neutral and like most of social media, certain content gets highlighted.

ColourBlueColourPurple · 26/01/2025 23:22

I completely agree. How hard must it be to be in such a vulnerable state and come on here hoping for a bit of kindness and advice and instead to get a real kicking.

saraclara · 26/01/2025 23:20

AnnaL94 · 26/01/2025 23:17

But surely that shouldn’t give people the right to be nasty bullies?

Exactly. And that previous thread had no bearing on that exctremely simple question that the OP was asking tonight. So there's no excuse for anyone bringing it up.

OP posts:
LostittoBostik · 26/01/2025 23:18

Agreed - i saw it and the response was cruel and disproportionate

AnnaL94 · 26/01/2025 23:17

Tentententhen · 26/01/2025 23:09

@saraclara the poster has also posted on AIBU. People read between the lines .

But surely that shouldn’t give people the right to be nasty bullies?

Puddingcloths · 26/01/2025 23:13

Agree. I flagged the same issue a few weeks ago on a thread from a DV victim who was ostensibly asking AIBU about whether a friendship was appropriate that her partner was complaining about. The worst part was people who hadn’t even read about the DV taking the query at face value and telling her to end the friendship, the worst message she needed - virtually all of whom changed tack once the context was flagged by other posters.

saraclara · 26/01/2025 23:11

Tentententhen · 26/01/2025 23:09

@saraclara the poster has also posted on AIBU. People read between the lines .

If tonight's thread hasn't been trending, those posters wouldn't have known of its existence, hidden away in fostering, where it belongs.
You are still missing the point of my OP.

OP posts:
saraclara · 26/01/2025 23:09

dachshunddaft · 26/01/2025 23:08

It's a huge 24hour site, there should be appropriate levels of moderation and oversight at all times.

Yes. The night watch should be given the means to remove a thread from trending. Or better still, certain branches should automatically be blocked from trending.

OP posts:
Tentententhen · 26/01/2025 23:09

@saraclara the poster has also posted on AIBU. People read between the lines .

dachshunddaft · 26/01/2025 23:08

LadyWiddiothethird · 26/01/2025 23:02

Ask night watch to hide the thread,until MNHQ can review it in the morning.

It's a huge 24hour site, there should be appropriate levels of moderation and oversight at all times.

saraclara · 26/01/2025 23:08

Tentententhen · 26/01/2025 23:02

@saraclara I do wholeheartedly agree with you ,trending has a really bad habit of highlighting threads that should remain with their smaller target audience…but sometimes( as in the one example you are picking up in your op) ,the op has more than one thread going on…if people have read the other thread( s) or older threads and have more of the story,or know the poster of old, it can bias them in one direction and make people more “ upset” or angry/ less tolerant than they should be.

Nope. That makes no difference at all to the point in my OP.

Threads on these sensitive subjects from vulnerable people in exceptionally difficult circumstances, when posted on their subject specific branches, should remain there. They should not be popularised by appearing on trending. Or if they do, and things start to go badly, there should be a mechanism within the report system, to get them removed from trending.

OP posts:
GreekSun · 26/01/2025 23:06

The irony is that this thread is now in trending so probably sending more people to the other one.

I agree with you though.

comedycentral · 26/01/2025 23:05

Thanks for highlighting. Mumsnet is going downhill rapidly; I've lost count of the things I've reported recently. It's no longer a place of support. The press sniff around for stories; Mumsnet adds posts to emails and other social media; it's all about driving revenue through ads. I've never seen it this bad, and I've been here for a while.

Tentententhen · 26/01/2025 23:02

@saraclara I do wholeheartedly agree with you ,trending has a really bad habit of highlighting threads that should remain with their smaller target audience…but sometimes( as in the one example you are picking up in your op) ,the op has more than one thread going on…if people have read the other thread( s) or older threads and have more of the story,or know the poster of old, it can bias them in one direction and make people more “ upset” or angry/ less tolerant than they should be.

LadyWiddiothethird · 26/01/2025 23:02

Ask night watch to hide the thread,until MNHQ can review it in the morning.

ANiceBigCupOfTea · 26/01/2025 23:02

Totally agree. There should be a place for sensitive threads which aren't available for the circus of nasty posters wanting to stick the boot in.

Crackanut · 26/01/2025 23:01

Wallawallakoala · 26/01/2025 22:23

Completely agree. Is it now unsafe to post a genuine question without getting judged to the extreme and attacked when looking for sincere help about something specific. It’s taken a horrible turn.

Yes I would never ask anything on this site anymore. There's lots of stuff I'd love advice about but I made the mistake of posting once(different user name) and well, never again. It was on the step-parenting board so you can guess how that went.

Swipe left for the next trending thread