Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Why aren’t you banning the far-right agitators?

587 replies

GoldMedallist · 29/07/2024 22:03

Deleting their posts but allowing them to keep inciting racial hatred under the same accounts is making the site unusable. Why should we keep reporting them if you’re not going to do anything meaningful about it?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
RainbowZebraWarrior · 02/08/2024 21:22

ThisOldThang · 01/08/2024 23:44

I'm genuinely interested in whether @RainbowZebraWarrior considers those things to be 'far right'.

This thread is titled 'Why aren’t you banning the far-right agitators?', so it seems entirely reasonable to establish what is considered to be 'far right'.

How is this a 'strategy of strawman false equivalence questions?' (which just seems to be a meaningless random word salad that's designed to shut down opposing views)

You want to know if I think the Brexit Party, UKIP and Reform to be Far Right?

My post referred to the fact that those rioting at the moment, apparently feel unheard. I said that we had heard more than enough from those that felt this way since 2016 with that same narrative. They make their views very clear, and have done for some time.

It is true to say that all of those political 'parties' / ideologies are right wing. It is also true to say (and has been said before) that not all people who voted for them are racist, but all racists voted for them. The leaders and supporters of them don't disguise that fact very well, nor try to disassociate themselves. They are agitators. They are without doubt inciting hatred. This is playing out in front of our eyes right now. I'm not sure how you can dispute that.

This has, without doubt, led to, and contributed to, a rise in far right beliefs. It had given people a vehicle in which to do so, and that's no accident.

DuncinToffee · 02/08/2024 18:21

The term 'illegal immigration' should not be used either, it's irregular immigration

SwedishEdith · 02/08/2024 18:14

I just think it was carelessly written.

CassieMaddox · 02/08/2024 18:10

SwedishEdith · 02/08/2024 17:58

I read that BBC article earlier today and, while it's good, I wasn't sure on this point "But its core ideas - in particular an opposition to illegal immigration". I think it's opposition to immigration full stop. But immigration of non-white people, in particular.

It's a typical BBC "for balance" point

SwedishEdith · 02/08/2024 17:58

I read that BBC article earlier today and, while it's good, I wasn't sure on this point "But its core ideas - in particular an opposition to illegal immigration". I think it's opposition to immigration full stop. But immigration of non-white people, in particular.

SwedishEdith · 02/08/2024 17:51

Uricon2 · 02/08/2024 13:10

I was thinking back to the foundation of the Anti Nazi League and the fact Brian Clough, Sir Henry Cooper and Jackie Charlton helped to found it (including financial aid)

All from working class backgrounds and renowned and respected in their sporting fields back then, not politicians but ready to stand up and be counted. I really feel that their contribution and support, the fact they spoke out, made a difference and it would now if people of a similar stature these days did the same, a clear unequivocal line in the sand against hate.

I didn't know that about those three. How interesting and admirable.

VerySadCase · 02/08/2024 17:50

SwedishEdith · 02/08/2024 17:49

Yeah, they stopped posting or were banned before Covid - imagine their posts on that 😀. They had a pretty identifiable posting style so would be hard to miss, I think.

Haha, Claig on lockdown...Grin

SwedishEdith · 02/08/2024 17:49

BustingBaoBun · 02/08/2024 17:38

Oh Claig! Now that's a blast from the past.

What peculiar threads he/she started and they loved Trump, Brexit, UKIP and was a climate change denier. Loved Putin too. And would argue on and on and on... Happy days.

Yeah, they stopped posting or were banned before Covid - imagine their posts on that 😀. They had a pretty identifiable posting style so would be hard to miss, I think.

VerySadCase · 02/08/2024 17:44

Yes, I remember Claig - how could one forget?! Wonder if they are still here under another name.

Posted on another thread but Sky News are reporting on a mosque that is promising free cold drinks and burgers to any protesters that show up there this weekend... and an open invitation into the mosque to chat about any "concerns". A brave but very interesting gesture...will be interesting to see how that pans out.

BustingBaoBun · 02/08/2024 17:38

Oh Claig! Now that's a blast from the past.

What peculiar threads he/she started and they loved Trump, Brexit, UKIP and was a climate change denier. Loved Putin too. And would argue on and on and on... Happy days.

SwedishEdith · 02/08/2024 17:33

VerySadCase · 02/08/2024 15:13

There needs to be much more control over social media. Why are the likes of Tommy Robinson allowed to even have accounts on Twitter? We all know what he stands for so why does he still have a platform? Surely if there is even a hint of people stirring up trouble, they just need to be barred for life.

There need to be whopping great fines on social media platforms where there is evidence of people having used them to incite riots.

Because Elon Musk has dodgy views as well.

Ugly though all of this is, at least it feels like the media are actually reporting on how it's organised now. That's a good thing. But, unfortunately, it's not new on mn. I was here during 9/11 and some insane stuff was posted then.

Personally, I think ignore and report is the best strategy - I don't have the time or mental energy to engage. And one tactic of bad faith posters online is to keep arguing so they keep amplifying their message.

The sleeper agent posters are definitely a thing. But for some it's just radicalisation. They genuinely start off as reasonable people. Anyone remember the days of Claig?

VerySadCase · 02/08/2024 15:46

VimtoVimto · 02/08/2024 15:45

I’m tempted to ask if that is the case why were the Southport rioters shouting out EDL?

A bit of old fashioned nostalgia maybe?

PandoraSox · 02/08/2024 15:46

VimtoVimto · 02/08/2024 15:45

I’m tempted to ask if that is the case why were the Southport rioters shouting out EDL?

Good point and one to remember!

VimtoVimto · 02/08/2024 15:45

PandoraSox · 02/08/2024 10:50

Oh, and the EDL has been disbanded is another one.

I’m tempted to ask if that is the case why were the Southport rioters shouting out EDL?

BustingBaoBun · 02/08/2024 15:36

VerySadCase · 02/08/2024 15:13

There needs to be much more control over social media. Why are the likes of Tommy Robinson allowed to even have accounts on Twitter? We all know what he stands for so why does he still have a platform? Surely if there is even a hint of people stirring up trouble, they just need to be barred for life.

There need to be whopping great fines on social media platforms where there is evidence of people having used them to incite riots.

Totally agree but Twitter has gone to shit since that idiot Musk took over.

Twistybranch · 02/08/2024 15:24

OrlandointheWilderness · 02/08/2024 15:23

Must read properly. Far right alligators are a scary prospect.

Far right alligators would indeed 🐊

OrlandointheWilderness · 02/08/2024 15:23

Must read properly. Far right alligators are a scary prospect.

VerySadCase · 02/08/2024 15:13

There needs to be much more control over social media. Why are the likes of Tommy Robinson allowed to even have accounts on Twitter? We all know what he stands for so why does he still have a platform? Surely if there is even a hint of people stirring up trouble, they just need to be barred for life.

There need to be whopping great fines on social media platforms where there is evidence of people having used them to incite riots.

marmaladeandpeanutbutter · 02/08/2024 15:04

I'm noticing now that BBC headlines showing that the riots and the preceding social media comments are being organised by EDL.

VerySadCase · 02/08/2024 13:21

ErrolTheDragon · 02/08/2024 13:13

@VerySadCase - sometimes I have a spell when I just don't read threads if I can tell by their title that I don't have the energy for them. I know that at any time there will be lots of other posters who can. Sometimes I read and report rather than investing time and emotional energy posting.
I'm able to engage at the moment - we don't all have to all the time.

Thank you. Good advice.

Sometimes I find it difficult to walk away because the shit that people are posting so obviously needs to be challenged. Leaving it almost feels complicit.. the virtual equivalent of a shoulder shrug. It feels so wrong. But you're right, others will be there to challenge. And self preservation is also important.

ErrolTheDragon · 02/08/2024 13:13

@VerySadCase - sometimes I have a spell when I just don't read threads if I can tell by their title that I don't have the energy for them. I know that at any time there will be lots of other posters who can. Sometimes I read and report rather than investing time and emotional energy posting.
I'm able to engage at the moment - we don't all have to all the time.

Uricon2 · 02/08/2024 13:10

I was thinking back to the foundation of the Anti Nazi League and the fact Brian Clough, Sir Henry Cooper and Jackie Charlton helped to found it (including financial aid)

All from working class backgrounds and renowned and respected in their sporting fields back then, not politicians but ready to stand up and be counted. I really feel that their contribution and support, the fact they spoke out, made a difference and it would now if people of a similar stature these days did the same, a clear unequivocal line in the sand against hate.

VerySadCase · 02/08/2024 13:10

PandoraSox · 02/08/2024 13:00

I might be wrong! Just a hunch as they have gone quiet. Maybe they are busy on other threads, though.

Yep. Or might have name changed.

To be fair, I post under multiple names on here as I don't like to put too much personal information under the same name, so can't really criticise!!

Apolloneuro · 02/08/2024 13:07

I remember once, on the Nicola Bulley threads, someone posted a photo of a boat building place, I think, near the river. The name was clearly evident. They then proceeded to pass on some spurious claim that someone dodgy worked there…had it been searched etc.

I screen shot it and messaged MN that if it wasn’t removed I would email it to the company, giving them the evidence to take legal action with.

Swipe left for the next trending thread