Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Why aren’t you banning the far-right agitators?

587 replies

GoldMedallist · 29/07/2024 22:03

Deleting their posts but allowing them to keep inciting racial hatred under the same accounts is making the site unusable. Why should we keep reporting them if you’re not going to do anything meaningful about it?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
CassieMaddox · 03/08/2024 17:42

ThisOldThang · 03/08/2024 15:44

"I consider that many of the twats who agitated for the hardest of hard brexits were far right."

I voted to leave the EU. I wanted a clean break from the EU. I didn't want to be tied to their rules or to be signed up to clauses about 'unfair competition' with the EU.

That isn't 'far right', it is simply implementing the result of the referendum - i.e. 'Do you wish to Leave or Remain in the EU?'

This is the problem with using the term 'far right'. Some people just throw it around and basically mean 'anything I don't like is far right' rather than the actual meaning of 'fascist'.

(By the way, fascism isn't actually right-wing. Somebody on the extreme right-wing would be a libertarian or anarchist, which is the polar opposite of fascist. Some people constantly conflate right-wing with fascism to the extent that the conservatives are 'far right')

With regards to the current unrest, I expect a lot of these rioters are fascists. Many will also be racist and antisemitic. Many, however, will actually claim to be anti-racists - the EDL claimed to be non-racist but was vehemently anti-islamic (Islam isn't a race). The fact that Islam hasn't been officially recognised as part of the Southport attack, appears to have been completely lost on them. This rioting appears to be a little more than a fun day out fighting the police and smashing up town centres.

Mumsnet needs to concentrate on banning the racists (rare), antisemites (seemingly everywhere) and fascists (rare) and their job would be a whole lot easier without people spuriously complaining about Brexit, conservative and Reform voters.

And the Islamophobes? Would do you think MN should do about them?

CassieMaddox · 03/08/2024 17:38

Rainbowsponge · 03/08/2024 15:15

Because they were the majority, you need to wake up at some point. I’m extremely pro EU, voted Lib Dem in the vain hope we will rejoin, but sticking your fingers in your ears and making out anyone who disagrees with you is a fringe lunatic with unreasonable concerns is what has lead to this entire mess.

No they weren't. The majority voted brexit. The far right idiots were listened to enough for us to get the most damaging version of brexit and they still aren't happy and are insisting we "listen to their concerns". Using violence.

Less than a month ago Labour won a massive majority. Why aren't you telling the far right they lost, get over it? Why aren't you insisting they "listen to the concerns" of those of us who don't want to live the way they want us to?

It's a rhetorical question, obviously.

Rainbowsponge · 03/08/2024 16:21

Efacsen · 03/08/2024 13:55

Maybe MNHQ have called in reinforcements to clear the back-log - just received 2 emails one of which is in response to a post reported more than 24 hours ago

Hope so

Reinforcements? They’re not an elite police unit Confused

Rainbowsponge · 03/08/2024 16:18

Efacsen · 03/08/2024 13:01

I'm ignoring you from now on

Go ahead, very apt given my points.

ThisOldThang · 03/08/2024 15:44

CassieMaddox · 03/08/2024 15:13

I don't consider "brexit" far right.
I consider that many of the twats who agitated for the hardest of hard brexits were far right.

We were forced to "listen to their reasonable concerns"

"I consider that many of the twats who agitated for the hardest of hard brexits were far right."

I voted to leave the EU. I wanted a clean break from the EU. I didn't want to be tied to their rules or to be signed up to clauses about 'unfair competition' with the EU.

That isn't 'far right', it is simply implementing the result of the referendum - i.e. 'Do you wish to Leave or Remain in the EU?'

This is the problem with using the term 'far right'. Some people just throw it around and basically mean 'anything I don't like is far right' rather than the actual meaning of 'fascist'.

(By the way, fascism isn't actually right-wing. Somebody on the extreme right-wing would be a libertarian or anarchist, which is the polar opposite of fascist. Some people constantly conflate right-wing with fascism to the extent that the conservatives are 'far right')

With regards to the current unrest, I expect a lot of these rioters are fascists. Many will also be racist and antisemitic. Many, however, will actually claim to be anti-racists - the EDL claimed to be non-racist but was vehemently anti-islamic (Islam isn't a race). The fact that Islam hasn't been officially recognised as part of the Southport attack, appears to have been completely lost on them. This rioting appears to be a little more than a fun day out fighting the police and smashing up town centres.

Mumsnet needs to concentrate on banning the racists (rare), antisemites (seemingly everywhere) and fascists (rare) and their job would be a whole lot easier without people spuriously complaining about Brexit, conservative and Reform voters.

BustingBaoBun · 03/08/2024 15:16

PandoraSox · 03/08/2024 15:12

Twistybranch I don't know what you are trying to do here tbh, but I have seen with my own eyes some unequivocally far right posts here this week from posters who have often popped up from nowhere. Some even encouraging people to riot. This is why @GoldMedallist started this thread. If you don't think the far right target places like MN, you are naive.

MNHQ seem to have done a good of banning the far right agitators, thankfully.

Totally agree. In all the years I've been here I've never seen such a concerted effort of posting such far right and racist views. They are not genuine MNers... some bots, some agitators, some no doubt part of far right organisations. It's obvious.

Rainbowsponge · 03/08/2024 15:16

(Brexit voters I mean not the far right)

Rainbowsponge · 03/08/2024 15:15

CassieMaddox · 03/08/2024 15:13

I don't consider "brexit" far right.
I consider that many of the twats who agitated for the hardest of hard brexits were far right.

We were forced to "listen to their reasonable concerns"

Because they were the majority, you need to wake up at some point. I’m extremely pro EU, voted Lib Dem in the vain hope we will rejoin, but sticking your fingers in your ears and making out anyone who disagrees with you is a fringe lunatic with unreasonable concerns is what has lead to this entire mess.

CassieMaddox · 03/08/2024 15:13

ThisOldThang · 03/08/2024 10:32

I honestly can't take any posters seriously that consider Brexit (a free and fair democratic vote that 52% of people voted for) to be 'far right'.

Idiotic claims that they're being 'held hostage' by the 'far right' because people expected their democratic decision to be implemented.

🙄

If Brexit is considered to be far right, how can you expect Mumsnet to take you seriously or to act upon your (presumably complete nonsense) thread and post reporting?

I don't consider "brexit" far right.
I consider that many of the twats who agitated for the hardest of hard brexits were far right.

We were forced to "listen to their reasonable concerns"

PandoraSox · 03/08/2024 15:12

Twistybranch I don't know what you are trying to do here tbh, but I have seen with my own eyes some unequivocally far right posts here this week from posters who have often popped up from nowhere. Some even encouraging people to riot. This is why @GoldMedallist started this thread. If you don't think the far right target places like MN, you are naive.

MNHQ seem to have done a good of banning the far right agitators, thankfully.

Twistybranch · 03/08/2024 15:03

PandoraSox · 03/08/2024 14:48

Thank you for setting all those things out clearly.

These protestors are peaceful. While I might not agree with them and might find some of their views intolerable and racist, they have a right to protest.

Are they far right? Well, they don't seem to be mindless far right thugs who actively wish violence on anyone not like them and who are burning buildings, attacking police and hijacking a tragedy in order to commit violence.

Eta: I think what I am trying to say is not all racists and xenophobes are far right. But all of the far right are racists and xenophobes. If that makes sense. Maybe it doesn't.

Edited

They hold the same opinions that many of the posters on MN have expressed in the last few days and they have been written off as far right.

One group is causing violence, the other is peacefully protesting but they hold the same views towards what impact they believe immigration is having on the settled population- increase in crime, women feeing vulnerable, resources taken from taxpayers, the area becoming dirty and unhygienic.

Many MNrs have shared this view of their area and but they have been hounded and accused of being extremists.

In the diverse and democrat voting area of Brooklyn, similar views are expressed that have been on this very site. Yet I doubt they will be accused of being extremists

PandoraSox · 03/08/2024 14:48

Twistybranch · 03/08/2024 14:29

Well in the article they accuse the a vulnerable group of immigrants of causing crime, making the area unsafe, making the streets strewn with litter etc . They are targeting them because of their race and immigration status.

So you don’t think that’s a right wing trope, to accuse new comers to the area for causing crime and making the area unsafe, particularly for women?

You dont think that its a far right opinion to express that they dont want any more immigrants in the area and that they should reduce the number living in the area from 4000 to 400?

Seems pretty right wing to me

Thank you for setting all those things out clearly.

These protestors are peaceful. While I might not agree with them and might find some of their views intolerable and racist, they have a right to protest.

Are they far right? Well, they don't seem to be mindless far right thugs who actively wish violence on anyone not like them and who are burning buildings, attacking police and hijacking a tragedy in order to commit violence.

Eta: I think what I am trying to say is not all racists and xenophobes are far right. But all of the far right are racists and xenophobes. If that makes sense. Maybe it doesn't.

1dayatatime · 03/08/2024 14:44

@Efacsen

"There's a whole section of MN where you can discuss all this ad nauseam

Name-calling, accusing PP of being Hamas/Corbyn sympathisers, de-railing etc is almost de rigeur

This thread is about something different"

Actually it is relevant to this thread by calling out the hypocrisy of the left of being very selective about who they describe as mindless thugs and who they describe as justified protesters.

It is also a tiresome left wing approach to dismiss pointing out such hypocrisy and double standards as whataboutery or de railing.

The inability to look at topics from the other sides point of view rather than dismiss / insult them as thick, racist male or white simply polarises and entrenches opinions even further.

Twistybranch · 03/08/2024 14:29

PandoraSox · 03/08/2024 14:19

Which far right sentiments do you think they are expressing?

Well in the article they accuse the a vulnerable group of immigrants of causing crime, making the area unsafe, making the streets strewn with litter etc . They are targeting them because of their race and immigration status.

So you don’t think that’s a right wing trope, to accuse new comers to the area for causing crime and making the area unsafe, particularly for women?

You dont think that its a far right opinion to express that they dont want any more immigrants in the area and that they should reduce the number living in the area from 4000 to 400?

Seems pretty right wing to me

BustingBaoBun · 03/08/2024 14:23

I read an interesting theory somewhere. These disturbances/riots were planned in advance thinking an autumn election was on the cards.

As a result of that, Farage would say he could fix it, thereby getting more votes than he and Reform did.

But.... he and the far right numbskulls have now shot themselves in the foot, because people are incensed about this behaviour. Brendan Cox (Jo Cox's husband) had it right... he is Tommy Robinson in a suit.

PandoraSox · 03/08/2024 14:19

Twistybranch · 03/08/2024 14:13

But they hold far right views right?
Their protests are peaceful, but it’s far right sentiments they are expressing aren’t they?

Which far right sentiments do you think they are expressing?

Twistybranch · 03/08/2024 14:13

PandoraSox · 03/08/2024 14:12

They may have legitimate concerns. It is also possible there may be racism driving some of those concerns.

The article doesn't mention that the protests are being orchestrated nationally by far right groups and known far right agitators as is happening here in the UK right now, does it? So whether or not the protesters have far right views is impossible to tell without speaking to them individually.

Eta: the article does say that "Republicans have used some of those cases to stoke fears about a so-called migrant crime wave besieging the country".

Edited

But they hold far right views right?
Their protests are peaceful, but it’s far right sentiments they are expressing aren’t they?

PandoraSox · 03/08/2024 14:12

Twistybranch · 03/08/2024 13:56

NYT article from today. These people must be far right racists right?

www.nytimes.com/2024/08/03/nyregion/migrant-shelter-brooklyn-killings.html

If you don’t have a subscription:

https://archive.ph/3Y8WS

They may have legitimate concerns. It is also possible there may be racism driving some of those concerns.

The article doesn't mention that the protests are being orchestrated nationally by far right groups and known far right agitators as is happening here in the UK right now, does it? So whether or not the protesters have far right views is impossible to tell without speaking to them individually.

Eta: the article does say that "Republicans have used some of those cases to stoke fears about a so-called migrant crime wave besieging the country".

Twistybranch · 03/08/2024 13:56

NYT article from today. These people must be far right racists right?

www.nytimes.com/2024/08/03/nyregion/migrant-shelter-brooklyn-killings.html

If you don’t have a subscription:

https://archive.ph/3Y8WS

Efacsen · 03/08/2024 13:55

Maybe MNHQ have called in reinforcements to clear the back-log - just received 2 emails one of which is in response to a post reported more than 24 hours ago

Hope so

Efacsen · 03/08/2024 13:01

Rainbowsponge · 03/08/2024 12:58

Just like it’s ‘de rigeur’ to call anyone who doesn’t parrot what you say 100% a fascist, Nazi or Tommy Robinson-lover.

I'm ignoring you from now on

Rainbowsponge · 03/08/2024 12:58

Efacsen · 03/08/2024 12:31

There's a whole section of MN where you can discuss all this ad nauseam

Name-calling, accusing PP of being Hamas/Corbyn sympathisers, de-railing etc is almost de rigeur

This thread is about something different

Just like it’s ‘de rigeur’ to call anyone who doesn’t parrot what you say 100% a fascist, Nazi or Tommy Robinson-lover.

RainbowZebraWarrior · 03/08/2024 12:39

Efacsen · 03/08/2024 12:31

There's a whole section of MN where you can discuss all this ad nauseam

Name-calling, accusing PP of being Hamas/Corbyn sympathisers, de-railing etc is almost de rigeur

This thread is about something different

Absolutely.

This poster is determined to derail.

I've reported their posts as inflammatory and I believe they also break MN guidelines for personal attacks.

Efacsen · 03/08/2024 12:31

Rainbowsponge · 03/08/2024 11:25

I know very well we are not at war with Hamas.

I’m very obviously (to anyone with critical thinking skills) making the point that the same people who want ‘zero tolerance, no debate’ with EDL thugs are the same people who would encourage negotiation and compromise with Hamas - whose tactics are arguably much worse and involve rape and murder.

People also say ‘Hamas don’t know what they want’ and they reject ceasefires, compromise etc. Yet the likes of Corbyn even calls them ‘friends’ and encouraged dialogue between them and the Israeli government.

I would like to see the same posters who say there should be zero debate with the EDL say the same about Hamas, to show their consistency. They won’t - because like the far right they’re very choosy and selective about who they call terrorists and it mainly depends on their own personal feelings about race and politics.

There's a whole section of MN where you can discuss all this ad nauseam

Name-calling, accusing PP of being Hamas/Corbyn sympathisers, de-railing etc is almost de rigeur

This thread is about something different