Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Ablesim on mumsnet

169 replies

Readyfreddo · 31/05/2024 07:23

Hi. I’m really interested in whether mumsnet has an interest in and strategy for combatting the collective ableism on this site, particularly (but by no means exclusively) directed and children with and parents of kids with disabilities and additional needs.

As a parenting site I’m sure you’re aware of the massive challenges associated with raising a child with disabilities, and I’m curious whether you’d let threads about any other minority, protected group run as unchecked as you do where the discussion is around children with disabilities.

There’s a thread currently running about an autistic 3 year old queue jumping. I’d encourage the site team to read it for many examples of how problematic these discussions very often are. (In summary - the view seems to be that the three year old is probably faking it and if he isn’t why on earth is he out of the house without proper paperwork)

OP posts:
EineReiseDurchDieZeit · 31/05/2024 19:56

Mumsnet knows its a problem, it's known for years, they do precisely zero about it.

The previous thread about it "Disability Hate On MN" isn't even that old.

I would welcome a "sticky" warning about hate speech across the forum.

I'll never forget the poster who said autistic teenagers didn't belong at public facilities Sad

Niceplaces · 31/05/2024 19:53

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 31/05/2024 19:06

It’s a moderated site though.

Theure quick enough to police racism.

If you ever read the Black Mumsnetters threads you will see that they often think MN is not quick enough to police racism. Others think MN overly moderates the site. There will always be different views on where the line lines.

It will always be a judgement. My own view is that the moderation is about right.

People who find the value that MN has on allowing discussion, as reflected in its moderation policy, are free to move to sites whose moderation policy better suits them.

TheShellBeach · 31/05/2024 19:52

Eeeden · 31/05/2024 19:29

It's a forum. People discuss things on it. I don't think opinions should be banned, certainly not opinions on whether you should let somebody go in front of you in a queue. Can't have much of a discussion if only one view is allowed.

Do you believe it's acceptable to make racist comments?

SoreAndTired1 · 31/05/2024 19:51

TheShellBeach · 31/05/2024 14:38

The point is that the whole thread descended immediately into ableist comments about ND children having to be taught to wait.

Not to mention ableist comments suggesting that the child's mother was actually lying about her child's disability.

It's pretty obvious the mother was lying. Most of us with experience with ASD can spot it a mile away, it stands out like dogs balls.

Are you suggesting no mother has ever lied about this? Really?

Readyfreddo · 31/05/2024 19:51

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Mind blowing.

I suppose it helps make my point though.

OP posts:
TheShellBeach · 31/05/2024 19:49

It's not ableist to say the mother of a disabled child is pushy. It's not ableist to say you don't have to let a disabled person queue jump. It would be ridiculous of MNHQ to delete those comments.

It would actually show that MNHQ were taking their responsibilities towards disabled people seriously if they showed that they were capable of robust moderation.

We seem to be no further on since 2010.

SoreAndTired1 · 31/05/2024 19:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SoreAndTired1 · 31/05/2024 19:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 31/05/2024 19:45

TheShellBeach · 31/05/2024 19:44

"The Equality Act of 2010 protects people against discrimination, harassment or victimisation in employment, and as users of private and public services based on nine protected characteristics: age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation"

So these opinions are not acceptable.
And MNHQ needs to have a long, hard look at the Act.

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

TheShellBeach · 31/05/2024 19:44

Eeeden · 31/05/2024 19:29

It's a forum. People discuss things on it. I don't think opinions should be banned, certainly not opinions on whether you should let somebody go in front of you in a queue. Can't have much of a discussion if only one view is allowed.

"The Equality Act of 2010 protects people against discrimination, harassment or victimisation in employment, and as users of private and public services based on nine protected characteristics: age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation"

So these opinions are not acceptable.
And MNHQ needs to have a long, hard look at the Act.

uhOhOP · 31/05/2024 19:40

TheShellBeach · 31/05/2024 19:24

No, it isn't pushy when a mother asks for accommodations to be made for her disabled child.

It's a very reasonable request.

She didn't ask for an accommodation. The boy had "pushed in", so to speak, and the mother asked if the OP minded, seemingly because the boy is autistic. She didn't go to OP and ask if she'd mind them cutting in; her request was retrospective, dare I say making the most of the situation that arose and trying to sway OP with a reason she should let them in front of her.

If she was after an accommodation, would she not have gone to the staff and asked for whatever she felt was necessary?

LordSnot · 31/05/2024 19:36

Tunefultwix · 31/05/2024 18:53

I think plenty of comments here are evidence of the OP's point, because they're claiming the queue-jumping post was about an entitled mother demanding to jump the queue. It wasn't. It clearly stated a toddler ran in front of another in the queue and the mother said, "he's autistic, you don't mind, do you?" i.e. politely explained and asked.

Perhaps not overt ableism, but deliberate exaggeration or misrepresentation of a disabled child's mother to depict her as pushy and demanding.

What was exaggerated or misrepresented? The OP, who was the only one there, described the mother and she was not polite.

It's not ableist to say the mother of a disabled child is pushy. It's not ableist to say you don't have to let a disabled person queue jump. It would be ridiculous of MNHQ to delete those comments.

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 31/05/2024 19:32

Eeeden · 31/05/2024 19:29

It's a forum. People discuss things on it. I don't think opinions should be banned, certainly not opinions on whether you should let somebody go in front of you in a queue. Can't have much of a discussion if only one view is allowed.

Except the disability laws and equality laws exist.

Eeeden · 31/05/2024 19:29

It's a forum. People discuss things on it. I don't think opinions should be banned, certainly not opinions on whether you should let somebody go in front of you in a queue. Can't have much of a discussion if only one view is allowed.

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 31/05/2024 19:28

TheShellBeach · 31/05/2024 19:22

So they should be!

Yes they should absolutely.

But they don’t moderate much else.

Years ago there was a time when particular things were pissing posters off. And instead of responding they just put on the bunch of flowers emoji.

It worked really well. Maybe we should try that again?

Speaking as the parent of an ASD child, these post attacking ASD make me stick to the stomach.

Perhaps MN should just run adverts for eugenics. Its seems to be their current target market.

TheShellBeach · 31/05/2024 19:24

uhOhOP · 31/05/2024 19:04

Is it not pushy? Or otherwise expecting or asking for something that really isn't due? Because presumably there was the option to take the child back to their spot in the queue...

No, it isn't pushy when a mother asks for accommodations to be made for her disabled child.

It's a very reasonable request.

TheShellBeach · 31/05/2024 19:22

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 31/05/2024 19:06

It’s a moderated site though.

Theure quick enough to police racism.

So they should be!

uhOhOP · 31/05/2024 19:13

Cofaki · 31/05/2024 19:05

There's also a thread running about a woman's husband suspected autistic, and her brother and sister were laughing at him because he was excited about an activity, and the comments on it are awful, saying it's fine to laugh at "odd" people. It's blatant ableism and it should be dealt with. As an autistic woman I find it very hard to read a lot of comments on this site. There's some awful views being expressed.

"Odd people"? Or odd behaviour? I don't think there was a single instance of anybody saying it's okay to laugh at odd people. There were a few mentions, though, that it's fine to laugh at odd behaviour if it's actually funny.

ZPS · 31/05/2024 19:10

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 31/05/2024 19:02

It’s increasingly like the Mail or Express on this website.

Exceot this website attacks older people too.

Is there an internet equivalent of Ofcom?

Its like disabled, older and menopausal women don’t count t at all anymore. Even though the equality acts exists.

It makes me feel sick. I tried to report it to the Equalities Commission once. But they didn’t deal with internet forums

Free speech above all eh?

It wouldn’t be so bad if it was free speech for all. We could then answer these goady posters in a way they deserve and may understand. Instead, mumsnet deletes any real challenge of their views because it’s apparently not nice. 🤔

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 31/05/2024 19:06

Niceplaces · 31/05/2024 15:20

This is not a site set up to support a particular sub demographic. Its a site where people can, largely, express their views and debate with others.

That can be very discomfiting when people express views that appal you. I am regularly appalled by views expressed on here, and I am sure others are appalled by my views. But overall, I welcome that. I find it really valuable to be exposed to those views and to be able to challenge others' views and have my views challenged.

There was a post the other day about a child who seemed to have the same condition as mine. Plenty of appalling comments about how the child needed to be punished out of this behaviour and was choosing it. But plenty more from parents who had similar children and were offering advice. In the end the OP got their child diagnosed and they did have the condition. I hope that some of the ' punish the child' parents learnt from that. That would be less likely to learn from it if MN were a deletion- happy site.

We can see even from this thread that some people call others transphobic and those throwing this label around will be called misogynistic by others.
People on this thread are distressed by the marriage support thread, yet posters on that site regard it as a lifeline.

Some people's views offend us, that doesn't mean the best course is silencing those views.

Some people's life experiences offend us, but that does not mean their life experiences should be extinguished from public records.

I am glad Mumsnet exists as a rare and valuable site where people from all backgrounds and experiences can talk, even if that is very challenging at times.

Its fine if some find that too hard. There are other online spaces that are explicitly support resources for particular demographics that might better suit them. Many of use will use those spaces in addition to Mumsnet.

But MN is a space for everyone, not just those with particular political beliefs or particular life experiences. And I am glad of it.

It’s a moderated site though.

Theure quick enough to police racism.

Cofaki · 31/05/2024 19:05

There's also a thread running about a woman's husband suspected autistic, and her brother and sister were laughing at him because he was excited about an activity, and the comments on it are awful, saying it's fine to laugh at "odd" people. It's blatant ableism and it should be dealt with. As an autistic woman I find it very hard to read a lot of comments on this site. There's some awful views being expressed.

uhOhOP · 31/05/2024 19:04

Tunefultwix · 31/05/2024 18:53

I think plenty of comments here are evidence of the OP's point, because they're claiming the queue-jumping post was about an entitled mother demanding to jump the queue. It wasn't. It clearly stated a toddler ran in front of another in the queue and the mother said, "he's autistic, you don't mind, do you?" i.e. politely explained and asked.

Perhaps not overt ableism, but deliberate exaggeration or misrepresentation of a disabled child's mother to depict her as pushy and demanding.

Is it not pushy? Or otherwise expecting or asking for something that really isn't due? Because presumably there was the option to take the child back to their spot in the queue...

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 31/05/2024 19:02

It’s increasingly like the Mail or Express on this website.

Exceot this website attacks older people too.

Is there an internet equivalent of Ofcom?

Its like disabled, older and menopausal women don’t count t at all anymore. Even though the equality acts exists.

It makes me feel sick. I tried to report it to the Equalities Commission once. But they didn’t deal with internet forums

Free speech above all eh?

Tunefultwix · 31/05/2024 18:53

I think plenty of comments here are evidence of the OP's point, because they're claiming the queue-jumping post was about an entitled mother demanding to jump the queue. It wasn't. It clearly stated a toddler ran in front of another in the queue and the mother said, "he's autistic, you don't mind, do you?" i.e. politely explained and asked.

Perhaps not overt ableism, but deliberate exaggeration or misrepresentation of a disabled child's mother to depict her as pushy and demanding.

Readyfreddo · 31/05/2024 15:35

@Niceplaces that’s a really thoughtful and thought provoking post. Stuff around children with disabilities does seem to be particularly vitriolic on here though. It seems bizarre to me that a site that says its aim is to “Make parents' lives easier by pooling knowledge, advice and support” is happy to let uninformed and damaging stuff about parenting children with disabilities run wild on certain threads.

OP posts: