Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Please please can you make the OP unquotable?

162 replies

StandingOvulation · 15/05/2024 12:01

My neighbour's optician's cousin works in IT and said it's uber simple to amend.

Save all of our heads, please.

💞

OP posts:
KomproMatilda · 20/05/2024 09:21

Do people do it because they have experience of other forums where the line of discussion is less apparent? I don’t know - I don’t frequent any others. But perhaps clearer guidance on MN posting etiquette might help, too?

JJathome · 20/05/2024 09:07

I read a thread on here where a few posters said they did it as they knew it annoyed people, I suspect that’s true.

id also make it unquotable. I find it ridiculous that people quote the initial post.

SoupDragon · 20/05/2024 09:06

Sometimes I quote the OP simply so that it's easy to copy pieces of it into my post. Sometimes I forget to clear the quote when I'm done

SoupDragon · 20/05/2024 09:04

Blanketison · 20/05/2024 00:03

100% agree.
Also was scrolling waiting for some twat to have quoted the OP, and v pleased to see it’s not happened… yet!!

On this thread? If so, you can't have looked very closely.

KomproMatilda · 20/05/2024 07:31

AND stick a link near the "add new post" box to make the OP easily visible to them while writing their reply, without having to quote it?

This is interesting. Only the OP may have become irrelevant if the thread starter has updated with info that changes the situation. Referring to the OP would be pointless and disruptive in that circumstance.

Overtheatlantic · 20/05/2024 07:13

Why does this actually bother people? I actually need reminding of the OP!

OpusGiemuJavlo · 20/05/2024 07:11

Abouttimeforanamechange · 20/05/2024 01:25

I agree with a pp who said it would be good if we could just quote excerpts rather than an entire post.

Like this?

Not like that no. A proper "quote" appears in a shaded box with attributed author and time stamp. Copying and pasting a paragraph is what we used to do before the quote function was added but it's a lot less useful.

There's clearly a cohort of users who hate seeing the op repeated eleventy-six times (including me) and a different cohort who are doing it deliberately because they are accessing mumsnet in a way that doesn't give them ready access to the OP. So perhaps the request to MNHQ needs to be to make the OP unquotable AND stick a link near the "add new post" box to make the OP easily visible to them while writing their reply, without having to quote it?

RogueFemale · 20/05/2024 01:37

LongSinceGotUpAndGone · 19/05/2024 20:43

Disagree. Sometimes a thread moves in a completely different direction, so it's reasonable to indicate you are responding to the original point, not things the OP might have said since on tangential topics.

Yes. And I'm 'guilty' of quoting the original post sometimes (not always). When I do it it's usually because it's a long post and I need to refer to details in that post as I write the reply. I really don't find it annoying when the original post is repeated above a reply.

Abouttimeforanamechange · 20/05/2024 01:25

I agree with a pp who said it would be good if we could just quote excerpts rather than an entire post.

Like this?

NewName24 · 20/05/2024 00:34

Oh yes please.

It is such a pointless thing to do, and when it is a long post, it clogs up the pages.

SnowFrogJelly · 20/05/2024 00:11

Your neighbour's optician's cousin Confused

SnowFrogJelly · 20/05/2024 00:08

StandingOvulation · 15/05/2024 12:01

My neighbour's optician's cousin works in IT and said it's uber simple to amend.

Save all of our heads, please.

💞

Why 🤷‍♀️

Blanketison · 20/05/2024 00:03

100% agree.
Also was scrolling waiting for some twat to have quoted the OP, and v pleased to see it’s not happened… yet!!

DoAWheelie · 19/05/2024 23:56

Itsabeautufulday · 19/05/2024 21:34

Nope, I can't. Just see the name of OP unless I click on 'see all' next to OP name.

I guess depending on how you access the website different formats are seen.

It's a setting you can turn on but it's a quite popular one.

Go to settings, then "Talk settings" and there is an option there to set how many posts you want to see per page, (25, 50, 100, or all).

VeraForever · 19/05/2024 22:54

I just scroll past. Takes less than a second.

DrJonesIpresume · 19/05/2024 22:41

OpusGiemuJavlo · 15/05/2024 12:17

But you can see the OP at the top of every page

I have it set to view 100 posts at a time. On a very long thread it is sometimes difficult to work out who is talking about which post and whether they are responding to the OP or to someone else, and by the time you have scrolled up and down, you are all over the place and can't remember what you wanted to say in the first place.

I agree with a pp who said it would be good if we could just quote excerpts rather than an entire post. I'm on another forum (hobby-related) and it allows you to do that on there.

crenellations · 19/05/2024 22:35

Justcats · 19/05/2024 21:59

It's just the same as quoting any other post. I don't get all the angst over it tbh.

By "angst" you mean posts?
So do you think people haven't read the OP so you need to repeat? Or do you think they have read it but need to read it again?

Fisherhatesgravel71 · 19/05/2024 22:26

StandingOvulation · 15/05/2024 12:01

My neighbour's optician's cousin works in IT and said it's uber simple to amend.

Save all of our heads, please.

💞

I totally agree

(Sorry couldn't resist!)

LookItsMeAgain · 19/05/2024 22:21

Q124 · 15/05/2024 16:56

Yes agreed! Also stop people resurrecting threads from years ago and replying like it's still relevant now.

As soon as MN introduced the "You liked this thread, so you might like these other threads" bit (it can be hidden in settings but I now see that it's popping up in the middle of threads on a screen so they've introduced something new recently) there was an outcry because old threads that some posters made but based on the topic may not have wanted to see again kept being selected by some stupid algorithm.

They won't introduce this because, from MN perspective, any hit on a page, even an old one, is a revenue stream and money talks.

LordSnot · 19/05/2024 22:15

😂Some people are so odd.

Justcats · 19/05/2024 22:10

LordSnot · 19/05/2024 22:05

Considering you've posted more than anyone in this thread, the angst would seem to be coming from your direction.

I didn't realise there was also a limit to how many times I could post on a thread.

Perhaps you could start a thread in site stuff suggesting a limit?

TheTigerWhoCameToEatMyHusband · 19/05/2024 22:06

StandingOvulation · 15/05/2024 12:01

My neighbour's optician's cousin works in IT and said it's uber simple to amend.

Save all of our heads, please.

💞

Why ?

LordSnot · 19/05/2024 22:05

Justcats · 19/05/2024 21:59

It's just the same as quoting any other post. I don't get all the angst over it tbh.

Considering you've posted more than anyone in this thread, the angst would seem to be coming from your direction.

Justcats · 19/05/2024 21:59

crenellations · 19/05/2024 21:56

Genuine questions: why do you do that instead of just saying "OP, ....."?

Do you think people haven't read the OP so you need to repeat? Or do you think they have read it but need to read it again?

How do you think anyone responded to the OP before the quote function was brought in?

Just trying to understand the train of thought that leads to posting the one post repeatedly that most posters are likely to have read.

It's just the same as quoting any other post. I don't get all the angst over it tbh.

crenellations · 19/05/2024 21:56

Justcats · 19/05/2024 21:50

I do know how MN works. And if I want to quote and reply directly to the OP then I will carry on doing so.

Genuine questions: why do you do that instead of just saying "OP, ....."?

Do you think people haven't read the OP so you need to repeat? Or do you think they have read it but need to read it again?

How do you think anyone responded to the OP before the quote function was brought in?

Just trying to understand the train of thought that leads to posting the one post repeatedly that most posters are likely to have read.