Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

PLease no more blinking categoreies

79 replies

codswallop · 04/11/2004 21:07

anyone yearn for the old days of about htree categories
please no more sections for "one legged mums who are vegetarian like a joke on a saturday and have blonde hair"

OP posts:
MrsDoolittle · 04/11/2004 21:35

I'm afraid that so many categories means that things do become a bit confusing and MN loses the 'cosey' feeling. Only my opinion of course.
Has Mumsnet become alot more active recently or have I just become slower?
Coddy, you make me laugh. How do you get away with it??

codswallop · 04/11/2004 21:35

lol I just put minxin tot he images search and came up with a lot less than minxes
some german prefessor claled minx

OP posts:
Justine (mumsnet) · 04/11/2004 21:34

Lou's met me, 'tis true.

zebra · 04/11/2004 21:33

Being the perfect clone of my own DD, I would like to go thru Other Subjects and parcel out the old threads to the new topics.

-Z (member of compulsive ordering order)

SenoraPostrophe · 04/11/2004 21:32

Maybe some sub-categories are needed, rather than whole new categories.

codswallop · 04/11/2004 21:32

I like to embed.
;)

OP posts:
codswallop · 04/11/2004 21:31

pmsl lou

OP posts:
SenoraPostrophe · 04/11/2004 21:31

Yes, can we have a "women who live in Spain and are grammar curmudgeons" topic, please.

Coddy, did you see I edited your embedded relative clause there? I do hope you don't mind.

lou33 · 04/11/2004 21:30

NO Coddy, this is Justine

codswallop · 04/11/2004 21:28

like those threads where everyone piles in? ;)

OP posts:
codswallop · 04/11/2004 21:28

I am finding "only joking " too explicitly UN- funny already
liek a pissed person in a pub who wants to tell you a joke.....

OP posts:
Justine (mumsnet) · 04/11/2004 21:28

The only thing is that 'tis part of our plan for world domination to get much bigger. If you've ever been on a thread with enormous numbers of people contributing it does get a bit sureal - by the time your answer pops up, you're answering a different question if you know what I mean, which can be fun of course but also confusing. More categories sort of spreads people out a bit, which is probably a good idea - but there does obviously have to be some limit - a full talk home page is probably a sensible place to call a halt...

codswallop · 04/11/2004 21:26

like that?

OP posts:
codswallop · 04/11/2004 21:26

"women who live in spain who are grammar curmudgeons?"

OP posts:
SenoraPostrophe · 04/11/2004 21:25

but other subjects is too big - it's impossible to find anything.

I like categories.

codswallop · 04/11/2004 21:25

justine

OP posts:
codswallop · 04/11/2004 21:24

mn HQ

OP posts:
Rowlers · 04/11/2004 21:24

Leave it as it is, no more needed surely?

lou33 · 04/11/2004 21:23

Agree with you coddy.

lou33 · 04/11/2004 21:23

I thikn if you have many more sections it will be getting a tad ott tbh.

codswallop · 04/11/2004 21:22

Its got that way already Jutine Ithink
a ittel bit of " other subjects" does no harm!

OP posts:
SenoraPostrophe · 04/11/2004 21:21

I think we should have a "Codswallop's rant of the day" category.

onlyjoking9329 · 04/11/2004 21:21

well i was impressed to see a thread with my name

Justine (mumsnet) · 04/11/2004 21:21

Well we hadn't thought of the bog off approach but we'll certainly add it to our armoury, thanks . Funnily enough this has become a topic of discussion at hq - how many categories and what's the limit. What does everyone think - is it too unwieldy or if not how many categories would be too many?

blossomhill · 04/11/2004 21:20

Coddy - you are crazy