Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Urgent we need your thoughts on chickenpox

156 replies

OliviaMumsnet · 08/11/2007 12:52

We've been asked to appear on News 24 about the Chickenpox vaccine today and we just want to hear your thoughts on this.

What was your experience with chickenpox? Have you had extreme experiences with it?
We'd love to know your thoughts as always (and preferably before 2pm!)
Thanks as ever
MNHQ

OP posts:
geekgirl · 08/11/2007 13:33

a friend's little boy (with DS) ended up on a ventilator in hospital because her got pox inside his lungs and pneumonia as a result.

Anna8888 · 08/11/2007 13:32

Chickenpox vaccination doesn't need boosters. It's a one shot.

geekgirl · 08/11/2007 13:31

my middle dd came down with chicken pox 4 years ago, the day ds was born - it was absolutely horrendous. She has Down's syndrome so her immune system was quite poor when she was little, and she really suffered.
All I can remember from that time is how bad her chicken pox was - she was totally covered in deep pox and seemed to cry constantly for two weeks (not like her at all), I don't really remember much of ds's first two weeks at all.

She still has deep scars all over her body

I would absolutely have ds vaccinated, no question about it.

Slubberdegullion · 08/11/2007 13:31

We did chicken pox this summer. It was unpleasant but thankfully no scarring now. Interesting to read in the Times today about the hypothesis that by vaccinating children against it you may increase the likelyhood of adults getting shingles.

IMO shingles is far worse than CP especially in the elderly. I believe they are waiting on long term studies in the US on that.

I have no problem vaccinating my kids against a disease that in a small number of cases causes significant problems and death, however would not be happy doing this if there was a subsequent increase in shingles.

IdrisTheDragon · 08/11/2007 13:31

DS had it when he was 23 months - wasn't too bad.

DD had it two weeks later when she was 6 weeks old - despite my being told that her age and the fact I was exclusively breastfeeding (I have had chicken pox) meant she wouldn't. I am uncertain how severely she needed to have had it to ensure she won't have it again, but she was very spotty, so I am hoping this is it for her.

I was concerned when she got it, as I had read information about very young children getting it, and having complications, but for her, it was really not a problem. She just fed and slept pretty much as she did without chicken pox.

When would a vaccination happen? I presume later than 6 weeks, when DD had it.

expatinscotland · 08/11/2007 13:31

when i was working at Edinburgh University, well, i was there for 4 years, and two of those saw big outbreaks of mumps.

when i asked teh young adults in our department who got it if they'd had the MMR, they said yes, as children.

no booster.

they do them now, but there's obviously an entire generation of adults who are no longer immune and have not been boostered.

it wouldn't surprise me if they did this with chickenpox, too.

yurt1 · 08/11/2007 13:30

Gawd they're not thinking of putting it in with the MMR are they? They should re-read Wakefield's work on CROHNS (not autism) and wild type measles.

AnAngelWithin · 08/11/2007 13:30

all of mine had it within a 4 week period. ds2 was the worst. he was 2 when he got it and it was awful. his face and eyes all swelled up, he couldn't walk, couldn't move. got them all in his eyes, mouth, throat and ears. i remember just standing him in the bath and pouring calamine lotion all over him straight out the bottle he was that bad! dd2 was 7 weeks old at the time and thankfully only got it mildly, but i was very scared as she was so young.

i got it when i was 14 and i am scarred everywhere from it.

i agree with the 'oh no not another vaccine' thing, but i think these days its becoming more and more necessary to vaccinate against things!!

Hekate · 08/11/2007 13:29

My boys both had it. DS1 was fine, bit ill but nothing bad, but DS2 had a REALLY bad time. His spots had spots !

Several of his spots got infected and he has about half a dozen really bad scars, including one that, believe it or not, covers about one third of his back... a huge circle, with rings in - kind of like a cut-through of a tree, iyswim.

He went through hell.

Flame · 08/11/2007 13:29

I would prefer it in teens who haven't had it too.

Some sort of set up like with tb and the heaf (?sp) test

GreenGlassGoblin · 08/11/2007 13:29

expat, mumps outbreaks at least in part due to changes in the vaccination schedule rather than a not bothering to give boosters. Looked like an administrative muddle to me when I tried to figure it out. My (limited) reading suggests the CP vacc does not need boosters.

andiemisletoe · 08/11/2007 13:29

I think they should have the vaccine they use it in other countries australia etc and it can be very serious it is another of those unless you know someone who has had it very badly situations you think it is mild
Also we would get herd immunity and that would protect all the vulnerable children who are ill with cancer etc from getting it

yurt1 · 08/11/2007 13:28

exacly expat. Especially as mumps is a very mild childhood disease. In 1/3 cases you don't even know you're infected. So lets just make it more likely for adults to get it shall we? Insane.

Could see the same happening with chickenpox, which is usually mild.

lennygirl · 08/11/2007 13:28

Message withdrawn

TheQueenOfQuotes · 08/11/2007 13:27

I'm just hoping that DS3 gets it when young, and that he isn't left with as much hyperpigmentation as the other 2.

But I don't think it should be in with the MMR.

expatinscotland · 08/11/2007 13:27

see, that's what concerns me. is that there doesn't seem to be enough attention paid to boostering.

for example, they introduced the MMR here for children, but did not bother with top up boosters for young adults until relatively recently.

so even now, you have serious outbreaks of diseases like mumps among young adults - with resultant complications.

foxinsocks · 08/11/2007 13:27

fluffy, I think lots of people don't see it as a 'dangerous' illness and some people will be anti having another jab and other reasons people have mentioned on here. I think they'd have a hard time 'selling' it to parents.

(as I said below, I would have taken it up had it been offered when mine were little).

katwith3kittens · 08/11/2007 13:27

My two have both had it an early age with no ill affects or scarring etc.

Would like #3 to catch it 'naturally' before he goes to school.

Not anti vaccines in any shape or form as all my children have been immunised, but would not put my LO through an additional vaccine for chicken pox.

I have had chicken pox twice (quite unsual ... like myself )once as a child then as an 18 year old. Again, no problems.

Should we not spend the NHSs' money on other things such as a vaccine for ALL against bird flu if it ever flies in ?

Flame · 08/11/2007 13:26

lol many crossed posts.

I have met quite a few people who think that their boys shouldn't have rubella because it doesn't cause complications for them

hunkermunker · 08/11/2007 13:26

Hmm, maybe I'd vaccinate adults who hadn't had it as children, on reflection. If that worked. I don't know enough about it. Don't pay any attention to my views - they're half-formed and changeable and I'm better off sticking to writing about breastfeeding...

GreenGlassGoblin · 08/11/2007 13:26

I stand by my comments on the other thread
"I'm not in favour of the vaccine as routine either, certainly not from what I know at the moment (and I'm very pro-vaccination as a rule). A bit of googling and a brief foray into the science journals seems to indicate that it's an economic argument, enriching the drug companies with a side order of keeping parents in the workplace not at home with sick kids. Agree that it's not generally a serious illness in young children, and there doensn't seem to be a chance of wiping out the wild virus, so a vaccination would surely just push the burden of infection onto the more vulnerable adult population. There is (or should be) a big differnece between licencing the vaccine for use (which is what has just happened in the UK) and deciding to make it part of the immunisation schedule."

TigerFeet · 08/11/2007 13:25

In favour of a vaccine

One of dd's friends was seriously ill with it when it went round when they were around 8mo. I understand it can be dangerous in the under ones - it isn't the benign disease that many people think it is.

Fortunately dd had a very mild case. Her friend was hospitalised and very nearly died.

pucca · 08/11/2007 13:25

My dd got chicken pox at 8 weeks old, she had it quite severe and couldn't feed properly. Even though my dd got it so young and got it so bad, she wasn't very very ill with it, i personally feel chicken pox is not bad enough to introduce yet another vaccine.

Flame · 08/11/2007 13:25

Her boys I think she means...

hunkermunker · 08/11/2007 13:25

ROFL, yes, only boys should have the chicken pox vaccine.