Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

Has MN lost its sense of humour?

106 replies

ConnieDescending · 03/05/2007 10:31

with offense being taken at all manner of inconsequential things?

OP posts:
DrNortherner · 03/05/2007 11:09

I'm not saying anything against chelsea pensioners. They deserve respect. That;s my point.

Boco · 03/05/2007 11:09

VVVQ like an ambush situation? You ambush pregnant woman when they leave the safety of their own threads? Reckon one of those v's stand for velociraptor!

PavlovtheCat · 03/05/2007 11:08

Have I missed something? I find the threads I am on have a great sense of hunour, those I dont find funny, if I want a laugh, I leave alone...

Can someeone fill me in on the gossip?

Connie you sound more serious than many on MN!

ConnieDescending · 03/05/2007 11:08

I wasn't just talking about the antenatal threads - all manner of offence is being taken at all sorts of silly things all over the boards.

OP posts:
VeniVidiVickiQV · 03/05/2007 11:08

OI! Leave the chelsea pensioners alone!!!!

DrNortherner · 03/05/2007 11:07

RESPECT has to be earned you know. IMO soem of the 'oldies' are wander around demanding it, just because. Like they are chelea fucking pensioners or something.

notsolilKel · 03/05/2007 11:06

Sorry forgot my manners. In answer to the OP, yes.

VeniVidiVickiQV · 03/05/2007 11:06

Dya think they could spell them though rowan?

rowan1971 · 03/05/2007 11:04

I'm not offended. Well, I am affended, but by the assumption on the part of the thread-titlers that the use of the word 'fanjo' is in some way hilarious and/or scurrilous. When in fact, in itself, it's just a mimsy euphemism for people who are frightened of their own genitals.

If you really want to shock people, why not use some proper anatomical terms?

notsolilKel · 03/05/2007 11:04

OK, sorry, but we are NOT on a mission to offend anyone! Get a sense of humour, please!!!

VeniVidiVickiQV · 03/05/2007 11:04

Well yes, but, we arent 13 are we, so I am generally trying to ignore it.

They know how the majority of us feel - if they choose to be childish/hormonal (?) about it, then I really cant muster up the energy to be pissed off about it. Because I am an adult.

I therefore bury my head in a good b/f or weaning thread.....which, sooner or later one of the fuckers will stumble onto

piglit · 03/05/2007 11:01

Agree with Soupy. Reminds of those whispering gaggle of 13 year olds you used to get in the playground.

quadrophenia · 03/05/2007 11:01

I don't get it

SoupDragon · 03/05/2007 10:58

The antenatal thread titles aren't done to be funny though, they seem to generally be a deliberate attempt to offend people.

quadrophenia · 03/05/2007 10:58

oh someone tell me about the antenatal threads, how an earth can these be offensive, presumably i have missed something

VeniVidiVickiQV · 03/05/2007 10:58

[bleary eyed]

What....? Have I woken up two months ago?

noddyholder · 03/05/2007 10:57

yes in answer to op not read the rest

Twiglett · 03/05/2007 10:57

have seen neither precious nor exlusive

but am loving Nadine's singalong

Twiglett · 03/05/2007 10:56

act-u-ally any joke is dull with repetition .. that's another reason it should be in the thread because then you read it once only

honestly the only joke that stands the test of endless repetition has been proved to be "What do you do with a wombat?"

NadineBaggott · 03/05/2007 10:56

yes my pressssssshhus!

FiveFingeredFiend · 03/05/2007 10:54

i think 'Precious' and 'exclusive' are the Mumsnet watch words of the moment.

rowan1971 · 03/05/2007 10:40

If we're talking about the antenatal threads - I've no objection to vulgar jokes that are properly funny. But these are just a bit witless, and hence irritating when you have to see them again and again.

PeterAndreFanCLub · 03/05/2007 10:40

totally agree
although humour more cutting htan it ever was before

NadineBaggott · 03/05/2007 10:38

r-e-s-p-e-c-t
find out what it means to me

sock it to me, sock it to me!

Dinosaur · 03/05/2007 10:37

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.