Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

Original poster

Can we have a without Breast/bottle feeding tick box pleaseeeeeeeeeeee?

16 replies

Beauregard · 30/01/2007 22:23

Angry
OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
kathryn77 · 30/01/2007 23:31

I agree with percy pig completely. New mums have new questions and should be able to ask them without being mocked.

percypig · 30/01/2007 23:09

I agree with cod and Tatties. As a relatively new poster I lurked for quite a few months and gleaned lots of really useful info and advice from doing searches. However I can totally understand why someone would want to 'talk' to another poster about an issue and discuss their own views rather than simply reading those of others.

Having said that I don't tend to get too annoyed by many things, but am probably judgemental and choose to ignore the threads I'm likely to either be annoyed by or find odd/disturbing - eg the butt plug thing which I've seen references to...but I'm not going to read it.

MrsSpoon · 30/01/2007 23:06

How about an Active Conversations without Active Conversation button. Wouldn't that be fun?

hunkermunker · 30/01/2007 23:06

Can we have a "can we not have an x, y or z thread button on MN" thread tick box, please?

Spidermama · 30/01/2007 23:04

The thing is though, of course we will be repeating threads which have already been discussed. The person who started the thread probably wasn't around when it was discussed.
I don't like this idea that we should be forced to plough through archives just in case a subject has ever been mentioned before. People come and go. MN is a living, breathing site and I love it for that.

If I see a thread which I've already done to death I simply don't go on it but I think it's a bit unfair to critisise people for starting threads which have already been covered.

Some people don't spend 8 hours a day on MN.

Tatties · 30/01/2007 23:03

But sometimes people want to have a discussion about something with the people who are here now rather than checking the archives to read a thread they were not part of. People are generally happy to have the same old discussions over and over again anyway.

I don't think there's anything outrageous on atm is there?

themildmanneredjanitor · 30/01/2007 22:43

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Original poster
Beauregard · 30/01/2007 22:36

arent they all outrageous ?
I think i have a build up of Parps
Parp
Parp
Parp
Parp
Parpin
Parp

OP posts:
themildmanneredjanitor · 30/01/2007 22:33

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Original poster
Beauregard · 30/01/2007 22:32

Yep definately a without sex one for cod

OP posts:
flutterbee · 30/01/2007 22:30

I second Cods butt plug!!!

Original poster
Beauregard · 30/01/2007 22:29

Those threads just drive me mad
Always too angry to post on them

OP posts:
brimfull · 30/01/2007 22:28

and please could epople do an archive check before thay start a thread,there are probably realms of them already.
God I'm miserable

DizzyBint · 30/01/2007 22:27

why are you cross? i never understand this. i have no interest in camping so i don't read camping threads. i don't request a camping..no camping option.

FluffyMummy123 · 30/01/2007 22:25

Message withdrawn

Spidermama · 30/01/2007 22:24

Whassup Pelvs? I hadn't noticed an argy bargy on that subject this evening.