Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Original poster

MN TOWERS - WHAT was wrong with the old layout???

447 replies

DingDongDraculaOnHigh · 15/12/2006 10:11

What prompted this change?

OP posts:
BrandyTutter · 15/12/2006 11:59

cliff, some thing go without saying

CliffRichardSucksEggsinHell · 15/12/2006 11:59

Can I be irritating too please?

DeckthehallsLaDiDaDi · 15/12/2006 11:58

I hate the new layout

BrandyTutter · 15/12/2006 11:58

cd, i was talking about JanH

but you can be irritating too, if it helps

CouldEquallyHaveBeenAnAardvark · 15/12/2006 11:57

I was thinking that about profiles and then I wondered about people who'd namechanged to post about their smelly flaps or something personal and if you could click on their name to bring up their profile, then you'd know it was UCM anyway

RTKangaSANTAMummy · 15/12/2006 11:57

Thanks for the colout change of titles

but could it be more different

like red cos my old age is making the colour change to purple not stand out much

THANKS

Original poster
DingDongDraculaOnHigh · 15/12/2006 11:57

irritating? moi?

OP posts:
MNHQ
Tech · 15/12/2006 11:56

Actually JanH you're right (of course). We'll address that in the new one, or sooner.....

JanH · 15/12/2006 11:56

I don't care, I'm shutting down now.

WhyDooLittleStarsShine · 15/12/2006 11:56

JanH - that's sabotage, I'm sure

BrandyTutter · 15/12/2006 11:56

she's right you know

irritating, but right

WhyDooLittleStarsShine · 15/12/2006 11:55

How about having a profile for each poster so we can know a bit about them?
How long they have been on MN,
How often they post,
what are their areas of interest.
This would come up if we clicked on their name. It'll be easier to spot trolls too. Obviously it would only do to have this on our original MN name and not for our 'sensitive' issues names.

Original poster
DingDongDraculaOnHigh · 15/12/2006 11:55

ooh starting to look a bi tmore normal

You do know tech that rather than just re-creating all the stuff we had before you COULD just revert

OP posts:
JanH · 15/12/2006 11:54

Tech, far be it from me to contradict you but in the Good Old Days a NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
only extended its own width, not everything else

FredBassett · 15/12/2006 11:54

I don't like it - but I need to spend less time here so it's great!

BrandyTutter · 15/12/2006 11:54
CliffRichardSucksEggsinHell · 15/12/2006 11:53

Not long enough

CliffRichardSucksEggsinHell · 15/12/2006 11:52

weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

CliffRichardSucksEggsinHell · 15/12/2006 11:51

I'm gonna do it!

RTKangaSANTAMummy · 15/12/2006 11:51

you are doing a deffo brill job

Thanks for the seconds back again

southeastastra · 15/12/2006 11:51

is the left hand column going to be full of ads?

BexieID · 15/12/2006 11:51

Ok, so the top one just changed, lol. Nevermind.

CouldEquallyHaveBeenAnAardvark · 15/12/2006 11:50

The Desperate Housewives ad makes me larf though - it's spelt wrong

katierocket · 15/12/2006 11:50

"Now, y'all is getting hysterical."

Here, here, bloody madness

PinkTinsel · 15/12/2006 11:50

thanks tech, you're being very patient cleaning up this 'designers' mess for her.

i hope MNHQ realise how lucky they are to have you!