Is Mumsnet HQ evil or not very bright.

Also, curiously, Tiggy seems to not give two fucks about transmen. You know the kind of trans person who started life with a vagina. Might mention mention them on a parenting site as they are likely to have given birth and suffer real discrimination, hey? No? Just TW?

Tiggy also regularly trolls the Feminism section despite no being a feminist...his thing is telling women what to do.

• oh and I have also had a pm from Tiggy in the past.

whem You could be right. I'm having awful dramas with my lady brain tonight.

I'm remember being surprised the op was a man, I imagined a harassed sloaney type pearl wearing blonde in a farm house with 4 kids and a plum in her mouth . Shows what I know!

Life seems so complicated now.

I thought Ubik was making a point about tiggy's constant commenting on trans issues while not actually being trans.

Why hadn't Tiggy been banned yet? He is a goady abusive horrible man who likes to bully women on this site via pm's. Really, why is he not banned?

in response to this I think that despite MNHQ being both thick, evil, and transphobic, they actually are worried about offending trans people and their activists and allies. Which would kind of prove this whole thread to be bullshit... I'd guarantee that if I posted a thrad accusing MN of being stupid for allowing goady fuckers in FWR that the thread would practically be pulled before I could post.

March, now that's an excellent question. His treatment of "weirdcatlady* was appalling.

Ooo, I've only just found this thread.

It was me who posted the meme which seemed to irk Tiggy so much.

This one

Flora he can describe himself as the Queen of fucking Sheba if he fancies, doesn't make cis any less of a load of old bollocks

Ubik Tiggy is, from his posting history, a gay man, not trans anything, so calling him she would be misgendering him, and he gets very upset if anyone misgenders people, apart from when it's him misgendering women of course, because that's absolutely A-Ok.

Why hadn't Tiggy been banned yet? He is a goady abusive horrible man who likes to bully women on this site via pm's. Really, why is he not banned?

Tiggy would describe himself as a "cis man".

I think it would be s shame if we couldn't discuss the issue of gender identity.

But in order to do that we do need to refrain from personally attacking people. And if Tiggy wants to be referred to as 'she' then we should respect her wishes.

No doubt I'm 'cisplaining' or whatever

I'm bowing out of this thread now before I say something like 'Oh do fuck off Tiggy, you are a twat and no one here gives a flying fuck what you think'. Not that I would actually ever really say that, as that would be a personal attack.

Nor would I ever bother asking Tiggy why he, as a man, who isn't Trans, who isn't a woman, who doesn't have children, he spends soooooo much time on a parenting website called MUMSnet, trying to tell us how to think. Because, if I asked that he a) wouldn't bother replying on here as he has been ignoring people's questions throughout and b) he would probably just send me another snotty PM (which would fail as I have blocked him - as MNHQ told me to do).

You are doing a massive disservice to a site that supports parents of Trans* DC.

I've seen those threads, have they passed you by? Page upon page of help and advice.

You might need to ask yourself why that bit of a Parenting Site doesn't figure in your attacks. They're not part of the recent trend for men to play at being women in the public eye, courting media attention and claiming to be The face of Trans, the only face of Trans.
You'd rather surf on the waves of the controversial and ignore the lead-up to the threads where women are driven to state why they are uneasy about the erosion of what it means to be female by men aping the most trivial of all the feminine trappings of make up and clothing.

Care to expand Sparkling? It's fine if you don't, but I'm intrigued now!

This thread has been very enlightening in a lot of unexpected ways.

Well quite, Cooger, however, I'm not convinced Tiggy is all that interested in what anyone has to say, not even MNHQ, he just wants to stamp his feet until his hissy fit has worn off.

Poor Tiggy the women didn't listen when you made your manly roar, no wonder you just can't cope. You've been answered, you don't like that answer? Dereg or suck it up. Just stop harassing MNHQ, it's dull now.

There is harassment on this site Tiggy you are doing it right now.

1. That'll be in Talk Guidelines, I dare say
2. What earthly business is that of yours? Like they are going to Out any Trans employees for your personal gratification
3. They did take advice iirc. Doesn't seem to cover one poster throwing their rattle out the pram because the mere mention of alternative views isn't met with an immediate Ban.

Send them another email Tiggy.

Btw what did the rest of their email say?

I don't think that sentence can have been the whole thing.

Tiggy, it does seem a bit like no one's really interested apart from you. Which doesn't mean you should give up asking if it matters to you. But maybe modifying your approach so it isn't so aggressive might get you further.

I wouldn't blame MNHQ for ignoring you like one ignores a toddler having a tantrum, given your present tone of communication.

I don't identify as agender because I don't there is such a thing as internal gender, it's a social construct that I don't agree with. I don't identify as a woman, I just am a women. You can identify me as a woman due to my secondary sexual characteristics. "I identify as..." is new terminology we could do without.

I don't think heterosexuals have any business calling themselves queer.