Ego did you only read the first paragraph of my post?
You don't think the debates are one sided, have partial information and use the examples of some trans activists to demonise an entire group?
As I said in my second paragraph - 'These are not 'trans threads', they are threads about women's rights and how these are being eroded by a small (but disproportionately powerful) group of people who at best don't give a shit about women, their wellbeing and safety, and at worst actively hate women. This affects us all, including those of us who have trans people in our lives who we love and respect, and including ordinary trans people who are being used as pawns in some really ugly politics.'
I am completely not bothered about how trans people choose to live their lives, right up to the point where women's rights begin to be eroded. Then I start to care.
Trans activists and their actions should not be used to attack and demonise all trans people.
I couldn't agree more. Unfortunately, trans activists and their actions are attacking the rights of all women and demonising any women who are not totally happy about this. Do we have to put NATALT (Not All Trans Are Like That) at the end of every post?
Can you explain what you mean by this? -
I will NEVER accept that women should surrender hard-won rights to those born male
And that is the dilemma MNHQ face.
Very different viewpoints.
- because it reads as if you think that women should surrender their rights.
I do think that those calling posters transphobic should be willing to back that up with examples, otherwise it's just a baseless slur.