Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Isn't about time MNHQ started deleting posts that attack people's spelling and grammar?

508 replies

cuntycowfacemonkey · 28/05/2015 22:06

(In advance I will say any of my posts are likely to have spelling and grammar mistakes)

It's such a shitty thing to do and often it is directed at poster who then feel they have to explain themselves and disclose they have dyslexia. I don't understand why MN tolerate people with potential disabilities being mocked in this way?

Why can it not be regarded as a personal attack and such comments deleted. Very often the arses that post comments about another posters spelling bring nothing else to the thread and usually it derails the thread and the OP's original issue gets lost in the ensuing bunfight.

OP posts:
BIWI · 28/05/2015 23:10

Jeanne - why shouldn't it be?

What's wrong with aspiring to that? In just the same way that people who come on here to ask about maths issues do.

There seems to be a view that spelling and grammar don't matter, whereas - to quote your own example - other areas, like maths, do. Why is this? Why do we not value the written language, and not see it important to learn and improve, whereas in maths it's seen as important?

JeanneDeMontbaston · 28/05/2015 23:09

Aren't they kind of interesting though, ubik?

Sure, they're wrong, and I've just made another wrong 'un queen picked up ... but they're new coinages and they might take off, and people will develop false etymologies for them, and they'll become part of the language. Which is how language gets richer.

CelibacyCakeAndFuckThePO · 28/05/2015 23:09

I think she was being subtle, Queen Wink

GiddyOnZackHunt · 28/05/2015 23:08

I think most people do judge people whose response to an emotionally difficult post is to pull someone up on their use of English. It's often something that says more about the smug pedant than the op.
And as a particularly pedantic point, MNHQ could end up in some spectacular grammar debates.

CelibacyCakeAndFuckThePO · 28/05/2015 23:08

ltk has hit the nail on the head for me. Ignore grammar and spelling (I'm not on about sensitive posts, or posters in distress) and standards will slip.

It is good to have standards. It isn't good to belittle anybody, whether that be for their grasp of the English language or for holding different opinions to what you do ignores subtlety

AWholeLottaNosy · 28/05/2015 23:07

This is a link about the number of highly successful dyslexic people there are. Fascinating reading!

www.dyslexia.com/famous.htm

Ubik1 · 28/05/2015 23:07

Do we have to put up with 'tow the line?'
Or 'suddenly on queue?'

EmpressOfJurisfiction · 28/05/2015 23:07

I've stopped caring about the spelling / grammar mistakes because you never do know someone's reasons, and I'll work my way through something without paragraphs.

But hubz, bubz and mummies are BAD FORM.

JeanneDeMontbaston · 28/05/2015 23:06

Besides, why should it be about the highest common factor all the time?

There are loads of threads where people come and ask MN to help them understand secondary school maths. IME people on those threads are polite and interested, and often try to find ways for OPs who don't understand much maths to get to grips with what their children are doing.

That doesn't mean MN couldn't also support people who are maths whizz kids and I'm sure some people are. But very few seem to mind talking about the basics.

cuntycowfacemonkey · 28/05/2015 23:05

I don't have history with posters tbh I never remember names. I will probably barrel in and respond in a supportive and caring manner to a thread you start tomorrow with no recollection of you on this thread. Feel free to tell me to piss off if I do Grin

OP posts:
AWholeLottaNosy · 28/05/2015 23:05

I used to be a spelling and grammar snob but I read a very long thread about people who really struggled with it and I stopped being so judgemental when I realised how hard it was for some people who, for whatever reason struggled with their spelling and grammar. It still bugs me but I'd never ever attack someone who needed support because they'd written ' could of'. ( even though I cringe inside).

I also have a friend who is dyslexic but is also highly intelligent and makes over £150k a year as a landscape architect, so it's really no indicator of how intelligent or successful ( or worthwhile as a person ) someone is.

QueenBean · 28/05/2015 23:05

And my irony metre exploded

Ah ha ha ha. And my irony meter just exploded!

ltk · 28/05/2015 23:05

Threads get derailed for all kinds of pointless shit. At least you might learn something from the pedants. Spelling and grammar keep this forum from sinking into textspeak. Maybe we should have a dictionary icon as a more gentle prod to proofread.

JeanneDeMontbaston · 28/05/2015 23:04

Is it really the 'lowest common denominator' to be unable to spell and to make grammatical typos?

Yes, I agree, it's good to keep learning. But it's not good if you set yourself up as the person in charge of deciding what the 'lowest common denominator' is and constantly putting people in that category while you're secure in the knowledge you're not in there.

BIWI · 28/05/2015 23:02

Why should we sneer at having standards though? What's wrong with that? Why is it about lowest common denominator rather than highest common factor?

cuntycowfacemonkey · 28/05/2015 23:02

Standards are highly over rated

OP posts:
CelibacyCakeAndFuckThePO · 28/05/2015 23:01

Haha, ok then.

I'm hardly going to make such an obvious grammatical error in my reply am I.

I'm still waiting to see where, in my first post on the subject, I was sneery (spelled correctly this time!), arrogant and mean.

I'm normally quite a reasonable poster. I've never pulled anybody up on grammar or spelling (unless they were goady little trolls). Yet you were quite awful to me. Do we have history that I'm unaware of? Or are you generally unpleasant?

JeanneDeMontbaston · 28/05/2015 23:01

I am unsubtle. Sad

Ubik1 · 28/05/2015 23:00

But we need standards dammit.

cuntycowfacemonkey · 28/05/2015 23:00

That might have been more of a freudian slip Charis Grin

OP posts:
BIWI · 28/05/2015 23:00

Yes of course, cunty. Which is what I said in my first post on this thread.

But no reason why people can't carry on learning when they leave school, is there? Communities like MN rely on people writing. So understanding how to write can only be a good thing, surely?

But to be clear, no I don't endorse PAs. I never said I did.

Charis1 · 28/05/2015 23:00

I am dyslexic. if someone corrects my spelling or grammar I don't think it makes me look small, i think it makes them look small.

Charis1 · 28/05/2015 22:59

someone did occidentally say earlier that they intended to ignite their MIL rather than invite their MIL!

usualsuspect333 · 28/05/2015 22:58

It is done to make the poster feel small.

It's horrible and makes me cringe.

cuntycowfacemonkey · 28/05/2015 22:58

Ah a subtle nod that's what that was. Gotcha Wink

OP posts: