oh dear, JARM, i publicly saluted you after that post.
i thought what you wrote was rude, of course, but gloriously so, and i'm sure nothing that he hasn't heard before.
at least you weren't ooohing about how dishy he is (or isn't, imho) and allowing him to duck out of difficult supplementary questions to his faux-statesmanlike answers... 'girl-related' indeed. 'feminist, but not too feminist'... i mean what a load of bollocks.
he's a twerp, a quick-witted, wily and amusing twerp and not in any sense a man of substance. a number of his comments were sexist and vile, which you might think fair enough, but all that crud about 'i can afford private schooling, it's the best, i've got a big car, bodyguards and a hit show in america'... he's the poor man's simon cowell, fgs.
on the other hand, i've read people say 'what would you expect from a former tabloid editor?', almost as if the type of man who climbs the greasy pole to be come a tab ed is somehow as stupid and fluffy-headed as the majority of his readers. he's a snake. he'd have to be in that job.
so JARM, i continue to salute you, when i read your little outburst i thought 'well at least someone's trying to cut through all this bullshit'.
and respect also to donnie, by the way.